sirloin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,002
Bonus points if he had leg warmers, or grunted
Bonus point for using a foam pillow wrapped around the bar was given.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bonus points if he had leg warmers, or grunted
Are you reading the nootropic Reddit?Anyone using nootropics (fancy name for vitamins)? I've been supplementing with higher doses of vitamin D, a variety of amino acids and probiotics over the past months and my energy levels and mood are definitely increasing. Thinking of adding fish oil, L-Theanine, Creatine and Bacopa Monnieri. Should suffice for now.
Are you reading the nootropic Reddit?
What amounts of each vitamin are you dosing with?
Why don't you guys just eat right?
Probiotics are good for iGents who can't leave their bubbles because their clothes might get soiled
More seriously, most people do not expose themselves to non-city environments and hence do not acquire the proper gut flora. Couple that with houses and buildings that are hermetically sealed and have scrubbed airflow
Eat some Keffir if you want to fit your gut flora back in shape
You gotta eat some dirt
Besides fatty fish, liver, cheese, and egg yolks are sources for vitamin D, as well as foods fortified with it like cereals, dairy
So from just being in the woods my gut bacteria will change magically? Lol
Anyways, all this stuff is cheap. Not more £20/30 month combined. Same price as a drink or two at a bar.
actually, yes. studies have proven that children raised indoors in completely sterile environments are much more prone to developing allergies.So from just being in the woods my gut bacteria will change magically? Lol
actually, yes. studies have proven that children raised indoors in completely sterile environments are much more prone to developing allergies.
That's not what I meant. I was raised in the countryside, have been living in the city for only a few years now. Anyways, I meant will being in the woods actually help my stomach that's been destroyed by antibiotics? Highly doubt it
i think he was speaking in a broader sense. not in the "well if we go hiking this weekend I'll cure my IBS for sure!" sense.That's not what I meant. I was raised in the countryside, have been living in the city for only a few years now. Anyways, I meant will being in the woods actually help my stomach that's been destroyed by antibiotics? Highly doubt it
No. Was speaking in a broader sense. Taking the probiotics to jump start things is a good course of action. Just don't rely on them. Eating fermented foods is a useful course of action and better in the long run.
Anyways, the best would of course be a lifestyle change, but that's not really possible if I want to continue this career. Seems like money and health are somewhat mutually exclusive.
Just like most "finance monkeys" you will one day wake up, think "wtf have I been wasting my life on" and proceed to become a happier and healthier person.
i use wrist wraps but generally the neoprene/spandex/cotton type. never seen anyone working out in the leather ones, but if you're going for the full John Henry bit, its surely the right move to complete the ensemble.Has anybody here used the old-fashioned leather "strongman" wrist straps? I have been bothered by a touch of tendonopathy in my left wrist. Unfortunately, it has forced me to forsake sledgehammer training for the nonce, and I do miss this form of exercise. Otherwise it hasn't affected my training regimen adversely, e.g., the Indian clubs and kettlebells. Anyway, I ordered a pair of the these straps from Rogue Fitness yesterday, and I am hopeful that their use will enable me to resume the John Henry act soon.
Actually fat fish such as salmon has lots of Vitamin D, plus being outside helps for the larger part of the year. Though you are right, something like 90% of the population ist D deficient. I personally don't take anything that a doctor can't prescribe, because so far everything that was wrong could be fixed by changing eating habits. Mostly though because I'm a cheap fuck and don't want to pay for it.
what about alaskan salmon, captain planet?Atlantic salmon is all farm-raised (bad for you), and wild Pacific is contaminated from Fukushima.
RIP salmon diet.
what about alaskan salmon, captain planet?
and even the waters from the interior rivers, which don't come from the pacific ocean?Yes Alaska's on the Pacific.
and even the waters from the interior rivers, which don't come from the pacific ocean?
clearly i'm a little bit out of the loopYou don't know life cycle of salmon?
Atlantic salmon is all farm-raised (bad for you), and wild Pacific is contaminated from Fukushima.
Because they never had nukes in the Pacific before Fuckoshima?? olo lol !!!1!1!
If you ate salmon in last 70 years you are fucked according to your theory - RIP LelandJ .
Please don't confuse the argument with your facts.https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.wir...ukushima-safe-fear-remains/amp/?client=safari
The enormous size of the Pacific dilutes radioactive isotopes until they’re harmless. In fact, only one percent of the radioactivity in the ocean comes from Fukushima, Steinhauser says. The rest? Cold War-era nuclear weapons tests. “Fukushima has not made a big impact on overall radioactivity, believe it or not,” he says.
The problem is, a lot of people still don’t believe it. “People are really afraid that the Pacific is so contaminated that you can’t eat any fish anymore,” Steinhauser says. “It’s not true, and I find it very difficult. This is one of the biggest challenges in my work.”
http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=83397&tid=3622&cid=94989
Are fish such as tuna that might have been exposed to radiation from Fukushima safe to eat?
Seawater everywhere contains many naturally occurring radionuclides, the most common being polonium-210. As a result, fish caught in the Pacific and elsewhere already have measurable, but small, quantities of these substances. Most fish do not migrate far from their spawning grounds, which is why some fisheries off Fukushima remain closed. But some species, such as the Pacific bluefin tuna, swim long distances and could pick up cesium in their feeding grounds off Japan before crossing the Pacific.
However, cesium is a salt like potassium, and it will begin to flush out of exposed fish soon after they enter waters with lower contamination from Fukushima. By the time tuna are caught in the eastern Pacific, cesium levels in their flesh are 10-20 times lower than when they were off Fukushima. A study published in 2012 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(PNAS) reported finding very low levels of cesium in Pacific bluefin tuna caught by recreational fisherman off the coast of California in August 2011. The FDA reviewed this study and determined that the levels of cesium were roughly 300 times lower than levels that would prompt FDA to investigate further to determine if there were a health concern
Radioactive isotopes originating from the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan following the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 were found in resident marine animals and in migratory Pacific bluefin tuna (PBFT). Publication of this information resulted in a worldwide response that caused public anxiety and concern, although PBFT captured off California in August 2011 contained activity concentrations below those from naturally occurring radio- nuclides. To link the radioactivity to possible health impairments, we calculated doses, attributable to the Fukushima-derived and the naturally occurring radionuclides, to both the marine biota and human fish consumers. We showed that doses in all cases were dominated by the naturally occurring alpha-emitter 210Po and that Fukushima-derived doses were three to four orders of magnitude below 210Po-derived doses. Doses to marine biota were about two orders of magnitude below the lowest benchmark protection level proposed for ecosystems (10 μGy·h−1). The additional dose from Fukushima radionuclides to humans consuming tainted PBFT in the United States was calculated to be 0.9 and 4.7 μSv for average consumers and subsistence fishermen, respectively. Such doses are comparable to, or less than, the dose all humans routinely obtain from naturally occurring radionuclides in many food items, medical treatments, air travel, or other background sources. Although uncertainties remain regarding the assessment of cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation to humans, the dose received from PBFT consumption by subsistence fishermen can be estimated to result in two additional fatal cancer cases per 10,000,000 sim- ilarly exposed people.
http://m.pnas.org/content/110/26/10670.full.pdf
Radioactive isotopes originating from the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan following the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 were found in resident marine animals and in migratory Pacific bluefin tuna (PBFT). Publication of this information resulted in a worldwide response that caused public anxiety and concern, although PBFT captured off California in August 2011 contained activity concentrations below those from naturally occurring radio- nuclides. To link the radioactivity to possible health impairments, we calculated doses, attributable to the Fukushima-derived and the naturally occurring radionuclides, to both the marine biota and human fish consumers. We showed that doses in all cases were dominated by the naturally occurring alpha-emitter 210Po and that Fukushima-derived doses were three to four orders of magnitude below 210Po-derived doses. Doses to marine biota were about two orders of magnitude below the lowest benchmark protection level proposed for ecosystems (10 μGy·h−1). The additional dose from Fukushima radionuclides to humans consuming tainted PBFT in the United States was calculated to be 0.9 and 4.7 μSv for average consumers and subsistence fishermen, respectively. Such doses are comparable to, or less than, the dose all humans routinely obtain from naturally occurring radionuclides in many food items, medical treatments, air travel, or other background sources. Although uncertainties remain regarding the assessment of cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation to humans, the dose received from PBFT consumption by subsistence fishermen can be estimated to result in two additional fatal cancer cases per 10,000,000 sim- ilarly exposed people.
https://www.google.ca/amp/phys.org/news/2016-07-pacific-ocean-fukushima.amp?client=safari
Radiation levels across the Pacific Ocean are rapidly returning to normal five years after a meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant spewed gases and liquids into the sea, a study showed Monday
Polonium? I KNEW IT HAD TO BE THE RUSSIANS.Seawater everywhere contains many naturally occurring radionuclides, the most common being polonium-210.
Please don't confuse the argument with your facts.
Or start with "this one weird tip..." / "what xx looks like now will leave you speechless"I really have to stop reading these fringe science papers. Note to self: the truest articles are ones whose headlines end in "!"