doghouse
King Of The Elite Idiots
- Messages
- 12,388
Goddamn North Korea is piling on lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
doghouse OfficePants wouldnt that mean that in one way or the other any government is populist? At the end they win because they are popular and they gotta be popular with the common folk.
So in summary, all politicians use populist rhetoric to one degree or another, and for the most part its benign. Anyone like Chavez, Ferdinand Marcos or Berlusconi are just pieces of shit. Pieces of shit are a lot more dangerous than a populist doctrine.
In summary, no. And you forgot Trump on your piece of shit list.
Hardly a counterpoint, but ok. I assume you're out of ideas.
Trump has been in office for like 60 some days. He's only a piece of shit in your fantasy world, because the guy has hardly done anything.
No, populism is a tactic, to appeal or get the message across to the widest possible demographic.
This of course goes against the grain of the divisive SJW/Democrat/Leftist world where we are all now boxed in on groups based on being white privileged or some kind of victimized "minority" group.
Morals are not really a thing.Morality is subjective at best.
Whilst I agree, there is a time and place where morality becomes affordable. It remains an ideal: no harm to others.
But yes, if your kids are starving then you may well kill to feed them. So too, if your god is starving or has massive ego worshipping needs and sees others not praying to him, I can understand too, how individuals can be motivated to kill to appease their angry god. It's not the Jesus god, so who is it?
I was answering to lord buckley. I think its more about conscience at the end.Morals are not really a thing.
. Its all relative as far as im concerned.
NOT AS DARK AS WHAT SARTO SAW WHEN HE SAW A MORROCAN!That view can lead you into a very dangerous place...
There's no counterpoint to make. Big P Populism is a political strategy, full stop. I already detailed for you the characteristics. It's extremely dangerous, and something direct democracy is especially susceptible to, which was specifically designed out of our form of governance. It's up to you to accept it or continue to tie yourself in knots to rationalize your emotional response that led you to here. If you say things like you don't understand how Chavez is considered populist, you just reinforce you don't understand what it means. He is practically in the dictionary next to the word, for good reason. It's what humanity has accepted as fact, whether you have or not.
If you haven't considered Trump a candidate for the electric chair since , oh, about 30 years ago, you haven't been paying attention.
I am firmly in reality. Which unfortunately, not many people are. They are fragile emotional creatures who use tortured logic to try and mold a reality which agrees with their feelings.
Dude, that whole SJW demographic that you always rail against doesn't exist in the real world. It's only on the internet. Things are much more nuanced than what you make it out to be. And you're also wrong about populism. You and officepants refuse to read and study it, only relying on your opinion. You're prime targets for this kind of stuff. Read the bridgewater report, written by a bunch of conservative hedge fund types, as far from SJW as you can imagine. Who do you want to listen to, some shithead breitbart blogger or a guy who is betting hundreds of billions on the outcome?
There are 100s of other sources as well, have your pick.
"Dalio, who in November was bullish on the incoming president’s ability to stimulate the economy, is now saying he’s more concerned that the damaging effects of Trump’s populist policies may overwhelm the benefits of his pro-business agenda."
Doesn't exist? LOL. I mean, speechless. Milo and Berkley.
In my life experience, the more shitheads you listen to, the more confused you become. Like you, who has deluded yourself into believing that social justice warriors don't exist.
How do you know I refuse to read and study populism? I mean, I know the NSA spies on me, but you too? It destroys your ability to be taken seriously when you take such impossible to know stands. Just because someone understands a word and derives different outcomes doesn't necessarily mean they refuse to understand it, it just means they refuse to adopt a consensus viewpoint stemming from a more encompassing political ideology, mainly leftism.
Same thing can be said for morals, stealing is wrong, but for some people it maybe fine if they do no harm to others and because they needed to feed their kids. Its all relative as far as im concerned.
Who
The
Fuck
Are
You
I'll let you know when I know myself.Who
The
Fuck
Are
You
ARE YOU EVER GONNA STOP CALLING ME THAT? "You are a fucking kid"Quiet kid, adults are talking
Dog, cat, or pigeon AND murder? Yup. Enjoy your dinner Bernie Sanders lovers.
Hey Leitmotif , just how does cat leg taste?
No, no. Only if you have foreign currency you can buy food.Oh, wait, you mean if you have money you can buy food? What a crazy concept. I thought everything was free.
Or you are part of the government Nomenklatura.Meaning they worked for the money, I assume?
Lol no, people that work our of the country, like my step dad, people that made money before them or with them, and government nomenklatura oficials.I see... so only people that are government shills get fed? Seems far fetched.
Lol no, people that work our of the country, like my step dad, people that made money before them or with them, and government nomenklatura oficials.
Yes.Ok so back to my original statement?
Meaning they worked for the money, I assume?
Yes.
ughThis is confusing stuff, homey clown. You mean when a brother work for his money he actually have money to pay for shit he want to buy?
These niggas wearing black be sayin' all this shit be free, and we need to feel the Bern.
I be better go finds me a jobby job. These antifa boys be trippin'.