Sammy Ambrose
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,588
'It's overstated isn't it, this thing about the importance of the roll on a button-down collar? The Ivy shirts I have from the 50s and 60s have really quite small button-down collars; they are beautifully shaped, soft and unlined but they do not really roll, there is instead just a minor kink so they don't lie flat against the rest of the shirt. And I think this was the norm. Even the classic, original Brooks collar, which did roll more than most, really acquired its beauty and fame due more to its softness of construction and quality of materials than the collar roll. It's another example of the distortions of time, the establishment of new orthodoxies of thinking that eliminate the complexities of the past. I partly blame the vulgarisation of the look in the mid to late 60s when British makers like Brutus and Jaytex just exaggerated everything to the point of parody. Old Ivy was really pretty subtle stuff.'
Posted by TRS on Talk Ivy.
This seems a good topic for discussion. For me a roll is important but it needn't be too big.
Your thoughts?
Posted by TRS on Talk Ivy.
This seems a good topic for discussion. For me a roll is important but it needn't be too big.
Your thoughts?