The Continental Forum Member Bored At Work Extravaganza

LKP

Troll Treasurer
Messages
4,981
Interesting to see that some of the patterns seem to come from MTO RTW and others are "bespoke" (or could be) if I am not mistaking.... I am tempted to start a thread how the UNtailor system works and how to spot the tailors who really do bespoke and those who do outsourcing to outfits à la Ravazzolo and then work with "Retouchentüchen"!
 
Interesting to see that some of the patterns seem to come from MTO RTW and others are "bespoke" (or could be) if I am not mistaking.... I am tempted to start a thread how the UNtailor system works and how to spot the tailors who really do bespoke and those who do outsourcing to outfits à la Ravazzolo and then work with "Retouchentüchen"!
Please do so.
 
Interesting to see that some of the patterns seem to come from MTO RTW and others are "bespoke" (or could be) if I am not mistaking.... I am tempted to start a thread how the UNtailor system works and how to spot the tailors who really do bespoke and those who do outsourcing to outfits à la Ravazzolo and then work with "Retouchentüchen"!
yes yes yes yes we want it!
 
ok ok - but give me a little time - this is a lot of work and I must not get distracted from my main mission: preserve bespoke elegance for future generations of NON-UNMEN! I will first start with a matrix comparing RTW to UN-RTW MTM to UN-MTM and best of all bespoke to UN-bespoke!
 
remember not to eat mouldy cheese while you preparing it . We don't want further delays.
 
ok ok - but give me a little time - this is a lot of work and I must not get distracted from my main mission: preserve bespoke elegance for future generations of NON-UNMEN! I will first start with a matrix comparing RTW to UN-RTW MTM to UN-MTM and best of all bespoke to UN-bespoke!

please do not act like FriendCustomer who first promises great things
then has us waiting on DW
and meanwhile snipes away all good vintage tissues off ebay
 
please do not act like FriendCustomer who first promises great things
then has us waiting on DW
and meanwhile snipes away all good vintage tissues off ebay
I am TOTALLY AGAINST THE USE OF VINTAGE FABRIC - better to wear vintage clothing! VINTAGE FABRIC is contributing to the DESTRUCTION OF BESPOKE (see my other post) - also it provokes rashes to your genitals if you are wearing expensive and thin undergarments....
 
I am TOTALLY AGAINST THE USE OF VINTAGE FABRIC - better to wear vintage clothing! VINTAGE FABRIC is contributing to the DESTRUCTION OF BESPOKE (see my other post) - also it provokes rashes to your genitals if you are wearing expensive and thin undergarments....

you dont understand
one BUYS the ancient tissue
and then hoards it
who ever talked about taylorze mani touching it?
 
you dont understand
one BUYS the ancient tissue
and then hoards it
who ever talked about taylorze mani touching it?
Hoarding fabric is for SICK WACKOS! These people are diverted-perverted and potentially dangerous for society....
 
Interesting to see that some of the patterns seem to come from MTO RTW and others are "bespoke" (or could be) if I am not mistaking.... I am tempted to start a thread how the UNtailor system works and how to spot the tailors who really do bespoke and those who do outsourcing to outfits à la Ravazzolo and then work with "Retouchentüchen"!

please do
 
X3 badspoke:

CLu827oWEAAb9JD.jpg
Sorry but I don't see the badspoke. The tailor very often needs to do this to avoid the "Collo Americano".... Ha, Scherensammler agrees - like!
 
I don't know how familiar you are with the Rundschau system, but it's pretty much the same for both. The difference is mostly in the amount of additional inlays in certain places like shoulders, side seams and hems.
Here I do not agree. Sorry, did not have my coffee this morning so my Di Napoli style is not on yet ... otherwise I would be typing in majuscules and with a lot of exclamation marks. Bespoke does not necessarily have more inlays at all, the Rundschau system was an attempt to close the gap between real Bespoke and MTO AND IT TOTALLY KILLED THE BESPOKE BUSINESS IN GERMANY!!!!! Therefore it should be ATOMIZED!!!! Ha, Sarto has taken control of my body again....
 
But I have to admit that I am impressed with your knowledge of suit construction! Also a point (no critique at all, trying to give complementary information), you showed us this picture:
54cd33841b663_-_esq-4-nick-wooster-interview-121812-xlg.jpg

Of an UNmen and for me this is a clear case of UNTAILORING: the crease in the shoulderline is the consequence of MORONI-CUNT-AILOR who, in order to avoid the Collo Americano on this horrible GHEY who has been doing bad workouts in a GHEY GYM with BAD PERSONAL TRAINERS and is thus deformed with too much sloping shoulders and too much muscle in the neck area proportionally, has turned the ARMS Too much FORWARD UNTAILOR Clusterfuck!
 
At the risk of sounding dreadfully boring, can we please try to discuss tailoring and construction in this thread without using abusive or pejorative terms and without getting personally insulting towards people? I don't really think that there's any need to use "cunt", "ghey", "clusterfuck" or other terms when discussing tailoring.

Let's focus on the clothes, rather than the people wearing them.
 
At the risk of sounding dreadfully boring, can we please try to discuss tailoring and construction in this thread without using abusive or pejorative terms and without getting personally insulting towards people? I don't really think that there's any need to use "cunt", "ghey", "clusterfuck" or other terms when discussing tailoring.

Let's focus on the clothes, rather than the people wearing them.
I WILL STOP POSTING IMMEDIATELY. Humor must not apply, and I guess you did not read the actual information in between faux-semblants.
 
I WILL STOP POSTING IMMEDIATELY. Humor must not apply, and I guess you did not read the actual information in between faux-semblants.

I did read the information, but I don't think that it's necessary to swear and hurl insults and epithets to pass information on to other people.

That sort of behaviour's fine in some threads, but I don't think that it's necessary or desirable in this thread. Let's try to keep this thread for a sensible, informative discussion rather than having it descend into derogatory name-calling, and you can use your Sarto-isms and insults in other threads.
 
A last intervention before my final goodbye: I understood this forum was created by a number of people fed-up with what is happening on Styleforum. In my opinion they are right. There is so much information circulating on the web now, which will kill elegance in time, as the younger generation will have no more reference, only sheer vulgarity and bad taste and general peasantery (I hope you all remember who wore tweeds in the beginning: rurals, and as a Huntsman salesperson once said to me: "Are we a rural Sir? I think not Sir!"). As a former professional and business owner in womens' fashion, grand-son of bespoke tailors, I can see all the signs of destruction, even annihilation of know-how accelerated by the total ignorance of the Styleforum crowd. I was surprised that a number of people (all five of you) started to see through the bullshit of a number of opportunists, who know nothing about clothes, cuts, bespoke etc. and just want to be in the spotlight and make some money with no plan, no brains. When I started going to Pitti there was no wall. There was just the Palace!

In order to contribute I thought it not done to write serious posts about it but to create a persona, partially me, partially an over the top version of … you know who … to get the message across. This seems to be hardly appreciated so I am leaving, after a couple of days. A pitti.
 
A last intervention before my final goodbye: I understood this forum was created by a number of people fed-up with what is happening on Styleforum. In my opinion they are right. There is so much information circulating on the web now, which will kill elegance in time, as the younger generation will have no more reference, only sheer vulgarity and bad taste and general peasantery (I hope you all remember who wore tweeds in the beginning: rurals, and as a Huntsman salesperson once said to me: "Are we a rural Sir? I think not Sir!"). As a former professional and business owner in womens' fashion, grand-son of bespoke tailors, I can see all the signs of destruction, even annihilation of know-how accelerated by the total ignorance of the Styleforum crowd. I was surprised that a number of people (all five of you) started to see through the bullshit of a number of opportunists, who know nothing about clothes, cuts, bespoke etc. and just want to be in the spotlight and make some money with no plan, no brains. When I started going to Pitti there was no wall. There was just the Palace!

In order to contribute I thought it not done to write serious posts about it but to create a persona, partially me, partially an over the top version of … you know who … to get the message across. This seems to be hardly appreciated so I am leaving, after a couple of days. A pitti.

dont be so touchy touchy. or are you homo?

Journeyman Journeyman is the führer of the aussie emereken pc brigade here dont let him distract you from your important mission
 
dont be so touchy touchy. or are you homo?

I don't know about the homo part, but I agree that there's no need to be so touchy.

You can imitate Sarto in other threads, but how about you keep it serious here. It's entirely possible to contribute your knowledge and have a discussion without the need to imitate a crazy bigot, you know.
 
You people really have no sense of humor! How could I be a credible Sarto persiflage otherwise? Anyway, I feel truly insulted, but now that I found out that is by an Australian it's alright.
But let's refrain from donning the Sarto cloak for a moment and talk serious tailoring and body posture and let's also provide some explanation as to how the Sarto persona works: when I am most serious you will find an explosion of exclamation marks and bigotry. For the merekens et all: this is how persiflage works since ages.
Now, the more intelligent can re-read the postings. Let's get to work for the other people around here. This time the word "gay" will be used scientifically (and this is a lot less fun).
Let's be open about it: large parts of the Pitti-wall-and-co community are also members of the gay community where it is "de bon ton" to work out. A lot of those people have been working out in a way opposite to "Mézière" in other words: they have been shortening the muscles around the spine whilst augmenting the neck and shoulder area. This makes them impossible customers for RTW or MTO. Unfortunatly, that is what they can afford, but they cannot wear it anymore! So we are bombarded with "Collo Americano" pictures of narcissic egotists unable to manage their posture or their suits. (the temptation was huge to put an exclamation mark). And this is where I link the posture fenomenon to the Scherensammler post and I go totally crazy because this is like an "alambique" obvisously, very difficult to disentagle the faulty concepts on a forum like this. This is an attempt to create a perspective between the excellent but imho partially misleading postings by Scherensammler and the problem at large: destruction of elegance.
Let's first return to what Scherensammler is posting: a RTW-MTO classification system called Rundschau (I was tempted to call it Rundfunk in capitals, but I am trying to keep Sarto under control) which, 50 years ago was capable to "wiggle" with standard patterns so you would get an almost bespoke effect: look at the customer, categorize him, pick the right pattern, adjust it according to the "school of Rundschau" and there you go. These systems are still used in RTW and MTO, but they can only go so far in correcting posture (be it good or bad). Otherwise bespoke is needed, where a personalized pattern is drawn based upon a first "toile" and then further refined over time (for a first suit 3 to 10 fittings would be recommendable). This is certainly not work in the same league, and my criticism to Scherensammler is that he blurs the lines a little too much for the neofites. Anyway: picture above is the failed attempt of a bad tailor to undo the sleeves and turn them forward in order to avoid the Collo Americano, instead of opting for a larger jacket and adjusting the body of it. This is also the problem with the imho excellent Boglioli jackets: they are well made, but should be taken "as they are" and if one does not have the fit to wear them: don't buy them as they need ubertailors to adjust...their lack of structure makes it difficult to adjust them. My general conclusion: dear reader: be AWARE that your BODY needs to be in the limits of tolerance of the averages in the "system", drafted 50 years ago in order to have a fitting garment, if that does not produced the desired result: go bespoke.
 
Just adding last point: that last paragraph does not take in account UNgarments made by cheap UNbrands where even people with normal bodies will have dismal fittings and where these will even change considerably between jackets (or trousers) of the same size! This is because the "mattress" is too thick, but I will leave Scherensammler to explain what that means :poke:
 
You people really have no sense of humor! How could I be a credible Sarto persiflage otherwise? Anyway, I feel truly insulted, but now that I found out that is by an Australian it's alright.
But let's refrain from donning the Sarto cloak for a moment and talk serious tailoring and body posture and let's also provide some explanation as to how the Sarto persona works: when I am most serious you will find an explosion of exclamation marks and bigotry. For the merekens et all: this is how persiflage works since ages.
Now, the more intelligent can re-read the postings. Let's get to work for the other people around here. This time the word "gay" will be used scientifically (and this is a lot less fun).
Let's be open about it: large parts of the Pitti-wall-and-co community are also members of the gay community where it is "de bon ton" to work out. A lot of those people have been working out in a way opposite to "Mézière" in other words: they have been shortening the muscles around the spine whilst augmenting the neck and shoulder area. This makes them impossible customers for RTW or MTO. Unfortunatly, that is what they can afford, but they cannot wear it anymore! So we are bombarded with "Collo Americano" pictures of narcissic egotists unable to manage their posture or their suits. (the temptation was huge to put an exclamation mark). And this is where I link the posture fenomenon to the Scherensammler post and I go totally crazy because this is like an "alambique" obvisously, very difficult to disentagle the faulty concepts on a forum like this. This is an attempt to create a perspective between the excellent but imho partially misleading postings by Scherensammler and the problem at large: destruction of elegance.
Let's first return to what Scherensammler is posting: a RTW-MTO classification system called Rundschau (I was tempted to call it Rundfunk in capitals, but I am trying to keep Sarto under control) which, 50 years ago was capable to "wiggle" with standard patterns so you would get an almost bespoke effect: look at the customer, categorize him, pick the right pattern, adjust it according to the "school of Rundschau" and there you go. These systems are still used in RTW and MTO, but they can only go so far in correcting posture (be it good or bad). Otherwise bespoke is needed, where a personalized pattern is drawn based upon a first "toile" and then further refined over time (for a first suit 3 to 10 fittings would be recommendable). This is certainly not work in the same league, and my criticism to Scherensammler is that he blurs the lines a little too much for the neofites. Anyway: picture above is the failed attempt of a bad tailor to undo the sleeves and turn them forward in order to avoid the Collo Americano, instead of opting for a larger jacket and adjusting the body of it. This is also the problem with the imho excellent Boglioli jackets: they are well made, but should be taken "as they are" and if one does not have the fit to wear them: don't buy them as they need ubertailors to adjust...their lack of structure makes it difficult to adjust them. My general conclusion: dear reader: be AWARE that your BODY needs to be in the limits of tolerance of the averages in the "system", drafted 50 years ago in order to have a fitting garment, if that does not produced the desired result: go bespoke.

Finally another poster that understands the importance of posture. So many iGents on SF have extremely forward and rounded shoulders, with hunched over stances. I believe some have even exaggerated it for the pictures, as it's becoming en vogue. Whenever I mentioned this people get extremely offended, like I'm not allowed to comment it, even though they post pictures online for the world to see.

You're an asset to this forum, even if you aren't from Belgian heritage.
 
Finally another poster that understands the importance of posture. So many iGents on SF have extremely forward and rounded shoulders, with hunched over stances. I believe some have even exaggerated it for the pictures, as it's becoming en vogue. Whenever I mentioned this people get extremely offended, like I'm not allowed to comment it, even though they post pictures online for the world to see.

You're an asset to this forum, even if you aren't from Belgian heritage.

belgium has a great history of producing pedophiles. complimenti, dear
 
Are dutch and belgiums cousins? like Spanish- Portuguese or French -Moroccans
arent we all cousins? yellow, white, red, maximally pigmented.

culturally the belgians are a bit of a mix between the dutch and the french. until 1839 holland and belgium were one country for a certain period of time
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom