Scherensammler
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,557
Not only Italy and Malta, within the continent we have the Visegard Group holding strong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not only Italy and Malta, within the continent we have the Visegard Group holding strong.
I think that it says more about the singular popularity of "Mohammad" as a name amongst Muslims and about the very wide variety of names used by non-Muslims, than about any sort of Muslim invasion.
As an example, the partner of one of my colleagues is named Mohammad Rizal bin Rashad, but everyone calls him Rizal because pretty much every other Muslim male friend of his is also named Mohammad!
If the UK was about to be absorbed into a Caliphate, you'd expect to see more Middle Eastern or Muslim names in the top-20, no, rather than just Mohammad?
In the UK it has been top of the list since 2010. Also have to keep in mind that Islam is still considered a religious minority, made up of several ethnic minorities.Depends on the numbers, the MSM is pretty quiet on actual numbers against each name. Taking in variations of the spelling of M., Mohammed has been the most popular boys name for much much longer than the last two years.
Same in Germany and it's neighbouring countries. There are already areas with up to 100% non European pupils. Pretty much all no-go zones where European laws and authorities have no rule. They still take all the benefits provided by the host nation's tax payers, though.School make-up of primary schools in London and Birmingham give an accurate demographic projection of the future make-up of society, particularly in urban areas that as we all know will be minority-majority, hyper diverse and full of cultural resource.
Someone is trying to revive this dead horse:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44719639
Wiltshire pair 'poisoned by nerve agent'
So, this deadly nerve agent is not only not lethal but now lasts months? Come on!
Hmmm what mischief is this? Only 8 miles away from the first ''deadly'' nerve agent attack.....
What next, more D Notices:
http://truepublica.org.uk/united-ki...hip-documents-relating-to-the-skripal-affair/
False flag or some dodgy crack cocaïne. You decide!
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.
Trump is going to meet with Putin at an upcoming summit, so I think this is a lame globalist attempt to throw spanners in the works once again. The substance was almost instantly called "Novichok" in the MSM, which has also been identified by a government laboratory.
Oh dear the couple poisoned are registered heroin addicts. Nothing unusual for them to be foaming at the mouth after OD'ing.
Here we go again:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44727191
Amesbury poisoning: Russia 'must explain nerve agent incident'
Opus deiWhat was the final score? Who won?
Did you watch any of it? If so i have no idea how you came to this conclusion.Weird scenes indeed and I notice now when the Democrats are on the run, they resort to four letter expletives to keep their demographic titillated and agitated to a suitable frenzy of moral self-righteousness.
Epic exposure for the Democrats. No evidence, no credibility and comes across as a cynical attempt at trial by accusation. The good Dr comes across as an agent of the Gladio resistance. An FBI investigation into a drunken high school teenage party in 1982 where the accusser cannot remember where it was, admitted they were drunk and it was all hazy? And all witnesses have advised they recall none of this? These people are an embarrassment to America. At long last, have these people no sense of decency?
I would be looking into the links the good Dr has to the Democrats, Hillary Clinton and links to the deep state. Promises of book deals and the like, and any reseach undertaken for government bodies. Go deep, run silent and follow all leads.
Did you watch any of it? If so i have no idea how you came to this conclusion.
Did you watch any of it? If so i have no idea how you came to this conclusion.
He never does. I think it is his faulty wiring.
How did this administration turn a nomination to the Supreme Court into a reality show media circus?
Personally and this is a unique position for me: I found both parties believable. At first, after listening to the good Dr. i was convinced. Then Kavanaugh took the stage and after listening to him intently, I too was convinced.
I'd agree with that assessment, though Kavenaugh came off as bitter, angry, wildly emotional and of poor temperament to be a judge. He was also highly and overtly partisan - something I've NEVER seen from someone in that position. Though he may be innocent of the accusations, he seems highly unsuited to the job. Which may be why the Bar Association is calling for a halt to the confirmation until further investigations are conducted.
dude
I'd agree with that assessment, though Kavenaugh came off as bitter, angry, wildly emotional and of poor temperament to be a judge. He was also highly and overtly partisan - something I've NEVER seen from someone in that position. Though he may be innocent of the accusations, he seems highly unsuited to the job. Which may be why the Bar Association is calling for a halt to the confirmation until further investigations are conducted.