The Streisand Effect

So some conservative blogs point out that Lena Dunham admits to being a kid toucher in her book. Like they watch her shitty show or were going to buy the book or were that widely read. Like the arrogant immature bitch she is, she rants about it on her own twitter account and cancels her own book tour.
:omgrunanimation:
And now we all now that Lena Dunham molested a seven year old girl.
:truestory:
 
http://samuel-warde.com/2014/11/facebook-responses-ted-cruz-post-will-make-day/

Ed P As a Republican who works in the tech industry I can say that this statement shows you either have no idea what you are talking about or you are bought and paid for by the American Cable monopoly. This is amazingly an stupid statement and is disheartening.

Keith F Ted, I am as conservative as they come…. I want government out of just about everything… and I hate to say it, really hate to say it, but Obama is right on this one. I do not want my access and internet speed controlled by my ISP. It will be. The internet has been an open forum with little to no restrictions, that will change and not for the better. Bottom line, do not go against freedom of the net just because Obama is for it. Even an old blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile.

Joey C As a Republican whom also works in IT like Ed… You have no clue what you are talking about or you are company bought and paid for.

A Jinnie M Goddammit, stop making my party look like morons and look up net neutrality. It doesn’t mean what you and your speechwriters think it means.

Marvin E Ted Cruz, as a tech and fiscal conservative in Texas who generally votes Republican, I am incredibly disappointed by your completely inaccurate statement. Please read up on what Net Neutrality actually is and fire any staff you have who are advising you on technical matters.

Sam A Senator Cruz, you are wrong on this one. As a conservative voter and IT professional, I can assure you that Net Neutrality is a GOOD THING. Internet providers (who are also content owners) can’t be trusted (as has already been proven) to allow consumers equal access to content from their competitors. This is why the government needs to ensure Net Neutrality as it protects the consumer from the bias of their Internet provider. This is especially true since we don’t have real competition in this space.
 
Thruth said:
http://samuel-warde.com/2014/11/facebook-responses-ted-cruz-post-will-make-day/

Ed P As a Republican who works in the tech industry I can say that this statement shows you either have no idea what you are talking about or you are bought and paid for by the American Cable monopoly. This is amazingly an stupid statement and is disheartening.

Keith F Ted, I am as conservative as they come…. I want government out of just about everything… and I hate to say it, really hate to say it, but Obama is right on this one. I do not want my access and internet speed controlled by my ISP. It will be. The internet has been an open forum with little to no restrictions, that will change and not for the better. Bottom line, do not go against freedom of the net just because Obama is for it. Even an old blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile.

Joey C As a Republican whom also works in IT like Ed… You have no clue what you are talking about or you are company bought and paid for.

A Jinnie M Goddammit, stop making my party look like morons and look up net neutrality. It doesn’t mean what you and your speechwriters think it means.

Marvin E Ted Cruz, as a tech and fiscal conservative in Texas who generally votes Republican, I am incredibly disappointed by your completely inaccurate statement. Please read up on what Net Neutrality actually is and fire any staff you have who are advising you on technical matters.

Sam A Senator Cruz, you are wrong on this one. As a conservative voter and IT professional, I can assure you that Net Neutrality is a GOOD THING. Internet providers (who are also content owners) can’t be trusted (as has already been proven) to allow consumers equal access to content from their competitors. This is why the government needs to ensure Net Neutrality as it protects the consumer from the bias of their Internet provider. This is especially true since we don’t have real competition in this space.
Click to expand...

Calling Jimmy Rustler.
 
is Ted Cruz too stupid to get any serious play/support for president?
 
Charlie Hebdo, apparently an unfunny leftist attempt at MAD magazine that nobody ever heard of, got themselves killed by antagonizing Muslims. Now we're all stuck seeing these amateur sketches.
 
220px-Charliehebdo.jpg
 
Never heard of it either. But fuck yeah, ye old prophet mohammed is about to get drawn of whole fuck of a lot now boy.
 
Russell Street said:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Streisand_effect

A current example over in England has some uppity Parliament member that didn't like being labeled as a "Jewess" on Twitter getting a guy jailed. And now there is something called Operation Filthy Jew Bitch to annoy her and call her such.

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/37558197/
Click to expand...

I always thought "Jewess" was more archaic than defamatory, sort of like referring to a man of African ancestry as a "colored man" these days. I actually always thought the term "Jewess" packed a certain exotic and erotic allure, reminiscent of the beautiful Jewess Rowena in Ivanhoe. When I hear "Jewess," I think of big brown eyes, lustrous raven hair, sensuous lips and...yum!
 
Last edited:
Jan Libourel said:
I always thought "Jewess" was more archaic than defamatory, sort of like referring to a man of African ancestry as a "colored man" these days. I actually always thought the term "Jewess" packed a certain exotic and erotic allure, reminiscent of the beautiful Jewess Rowena in Ivanhoe. When I hear "Jewess," I think of big brown eyes, lustrous raven hair, sensuous lips and...yum!
Click to expand...
I remember a school conversation over two decades ago over whether "Jew" was an insult and whether "Jewish person" was somehow better. Another goofy term, that I don't even know the legitimacy of, is Negress.
I must say, that if someone referred to me as a Celt, a Hibernian, or even a Bohunk...I wouldn't much care and would be as amused as anything.
 
Speaking as a gentile, my impression is that "Jew" as a noun is an honorable and respectful term. "Jew" as a verb or adjective is vulgar and offensive. I think "Negress" is archaic these days, as is the term "Negro," although it always seemed like a very useful term, more so than "Black" or "African-American." Of course, when I was young, "Negro" was the preferred and respectful term for such people. For some reason, feminists decided that the feminine suffix "-ess" was demeaning. Thus we witness actresses referring to themselves as "actors," at which I always wince.
 
Ah - interesting. And a bit sad. Anyway it seems that Muffy herself wasn't hassled but other bloggers in the same vein were, and it evidently put a sour taste in her mouth. She probably got a glimpse of a nasty underbelly of the interwebz (keyboard losers, in her goodbye post), and decided her time was better spent active and outdoors. I liked her blog, it was authoritative without being overbearing, her posts were consistently well-written and informative, and her photographs were well-chosen.
 
As best as I can piece together, it was figured out that her husband originally had some non-Anglo surname and that he also gave his own book a positive review using a variation on this name. And maybe a few people were piecing together her liberal clues to find out where she lived.
The conventional wisdom is that she has blocked access to her site if you come directly from some "enemy" website. And by doing so, the topic has come to my attention.

I liked her when she talked clothes and stayed on point. She did take lots of great photos, but I really didn't care so much about that or her outings. The comparison of old LL Bean stuff vs. the new and her great brand state chart (cash grab, empty shell) were what I found to be the best content.
 
This thread reminds me of an incident involving my mother at Alexandria Avenue School in Los Angeles, which I also attended some 22 years after she did.

To keep this in perspective, the following occurred sometime in the 1920s or very early '30s, in other words, well before the Holocaust. Anyway, she called a boy at the school a "big, fat Jew." Joel, his name was, complained to his parents, who in turn took the matter up with the principal, who was very fond of my mother. A meeting was arranged, where the following dialogue ensued.

Principal: Joel, you are Jewish, aren't you?
Joel: Well...yes.
Principal: And you are big and fat?
Joel (hesitantly): Yes
Principal: So where's the insult?

Case dismissed. These days, my mother probably would have been crucified in front of the school! However, I am sure it would never happen these days because I am all but certain there are no Jews in the school. Nor are there any Anglo gentiles, for that matter. I am sure Alexandria Avenue School is about 95% Latino.
 
Jan Libourel said:
This thread reminds me of an incident involving my mother at Alexandria Avenue School in Los Angeles, which I also attended some 22 years after she did.

To keep this in perspective, the following occurred sometime in the 1920s or very early '30s, in other words, well before the Holocaust. Anyway, she called a boy at the school a "big, fat Jew." Joel, his name was, complained to his parents, who in turn took the matter up with the principal, who was very fond of my mother. A meeting was arranged, where the following dialogue ensued.

Principal: Joel, you are Jewish, aren't you?
Joel: Well...yes.
Principal: And you are big and fat?
Joel (hesitantly): Yes
Principal: So where's the insult?

Case dismissed. These days, my mother probably would have been crucified in front of the school! However, I am sure it would never happen these days because I am all but certain there are no Jews in the school. Nor are there any Anglo gentiles, for that matter. I am sure Alexandria Avenue School is about 95% Latino.
Click to expand...

My HS went from about 70% whitey to 70% Latino is about 10 years after I graduated. When Latinos invade, they don't fuck around.
 
Just did a little research on Alexandria: "Minority enrollment is 99% (majority Hispanic)."

Game over, Whitey!

Update: I suppose that last comment of mine renders me guilty of the common ethnic stereotype that Mexican=mestizo. This is by no means always the case. I have met some Mexicans who are every bit as white as I am. But, then, I suppose I am something of a "mestizo" myself, having some American Indian (Mohawk) ancestry.

Actually, Mexicans and Central Americans can be pure Indians, mestizos, whites or negroes. (I still think the honorable term "negro" is preferable to such circumlocutions as "African-Mexican," "African-Nicaraguan" or "African-Panamanian.")
 
Last edited:
I think Tom Cruise suing anyone that mentions that he might not be straight qualifies here. There are many other alleged closet queers that know enough to ignore being called out and to not protest too much.
 
Scherensammler said:
That's exactly what they said when George Michael got busted for approaching a police officer in a public toilet.
It was all over the news and then he came out officially!
Click to expand...
Is that why this thread is named after Babs?

Cause you know, only ghey Pitti - peacocks like the music of Barbra Streisand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom