A Futile and Stupid Gesture: The History of the Trump Presidency & Q-Anon


From the WaPo article:

Trump’s conversation with Raffensperger put him in legally questionable territory, legal experts said. By exhorting the secretary of state to “find” votes and to deploy investigators who “want to find answers,” Trump appears to be encouraging him to doctor the election outcome in Georgia.

But experts said Trump’s clearer transgression is a moral one. Edward B. Foley, a law professor at Ohio State University, said that the legal questions are murky and would be subject to prosecutorial discretion. But he also emphasized that the call was “inappropriate and contemptible” and should prompt moral outrage.

“He was already tripping the emergency meter,” Foley said. “So we were at 12 on a scale of 1 to 10, and now we’re at 15.”

Throughout the call, Trump detailed an exhaustive list of disinformation and conspiracy theories to support his position. He claimed without evidence that he had won Georgia by at least a half-million votes. He floated a barrage of assertions that have been investigated and disproved: that thousands of dead people voted; that an Atlanta election worker scanned 18,000 forged ballots three times each and “100 percent” were for Biden; that thousands more voters living out of state came back to Georgia illegally just to vote in the election.

“So tell me, Brad, what are we going to do? We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this,” Trump said. “And it’s going to be very costly in many ways. And I think you have to say that you’re going to reexamine it, and you can reexamine it, but reexamine it with people that want to find answers, not people who don’t want to find answers.”

Trump did most of the talking on the call. He was angry and impatient, calling Raffensperger a “child” and “either dishonest or incompetent” for not believing there was widespread ballot fraud in Atlanta — and twice calling himself a “schmuck” for endorsing Kemp, whom Trump holds in particular contempt for not embracing his claims of fraud.
 
If people choose to look. That’s the problem.

It’s like hanging chads and the misuse of postal votes in the U.K.
Maybe they will look. It seems Ted Cruz and other Republicans may challenge disputed votes.


The above is from the left wing Grauniad. So it should not be considered as Trump-supporting fake news.
 
Maybe they will look. It seems Ted Cruz and other Republicans may challenge disputed votes.


The above is from the left wing Grauniad. So it should not be considered as Trump-supporting fake news.
You probably aren't aware, but the results have all been audited and have hand recounts, multiple times in several cases. This was back in November in fact.

The "looking" has long since been done.
 
“The time for questioning the results has passed; the time for the formal counting of the electoral college votes, as prescribed in the Constitution and statute, has arrived,” they wrote.

 
“The time for questioning the results has passed; the time for the formal counting of the electoral college votes, as prescribed in the Constitution and statute, has arrived,” they wrote.

Excellent. Sanity rules.
 
I wonder if Trump will end up with a pair of shoos named after him. I have a pair of Loake Churchill and Cheaney Asquith. Trickers Trump?

E029A430-AFC9-4E09-8EB9-5F92ACA5C868.jpeg


 

"Prosecutors, however, 'would need to demonstrate he knows he lost the election,' Sanderson said, adding, 'I think that's a tough case to bring against an individual who seems pathologically unable to recognize his own loss.'"

Any bets on whether he passes a lie detector when asked if he lost the election.
 
It will be Trump of course. We need 4 more years.

Just one last note about the hack job the Washington Post did on releasing Trump making those statements about getting 11,000 votes.

Remember the old rule guys; never trust media which chops up conversations taking bits of pieces here and there. CONTEXT is very important, and accepting a butchered recording as evidence of Trump voter fraud is very naive.

Just keeping it real guys.

Oh, and now there is this.

Exclusive: over 423,000 votes removed from Trump in Pennsylvania, data scientists say​




The Democrats thought they would get away with voter fraud, but it is going to come back to bite them. Biden is toast! Seems like 140 republicans are going to protest the electoral college vote, and about 1,000,000 are set to protest outside congress. Trump is a fighter and he is going to sort this out.

So you want to wager a pair of JLP bespoke then?
 
So you want to wager a pair of JLP bespoke then?
Shooman don’t get into gambling on election results. I just watched the film ‘Mank’. The main protagonist places a huge bet with a movie mogul on the 1934 Californian gubernatorial election involving Upton Sinclair.

The election was notable for false propaganda films attacking Sinclair. However, in this instance Sinclair was a socialist.
 
Just to prove I wasn't seeing things when I went out for a smoke.



 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom