belinmad
Damn Tacky Big Collar Daddy
- Messages
- 2,429
I can explain the Phd claim away (as I did). Based on your non-sensical answer - you’ll still be stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Australia's environment in 'shocking' decline, report finds
Extinctions are growing and 19 ecosystems are on the brink of collapse, a five-year survey warns.www.bbc.com
"Australia has vowed to cut carbon emissions by 43% on 2005 levels by 2030. Under its previous government, the target was 26-28%."
This is like my workplace. Let's keep increasing the target, keep the same timeframe, and hope we get there.
No doubt it is getting hotter but a lot of us in the west have to adapt. It really isn't that big a deal.
I was in Prague and Lisbon last week and it was hell. My sleep has been fucked in the heat but I don't see the reason for mass hysteria. Sure, be a good neighbour and check on those more vulnerable but for most, meh.
I managed to run 8 miles today in 39 degree C weather. I didn't die
Wait a second. So now it’s the weather in Spain’s fault that it’s hot in the UK?^Do you trust the alarmist BBC?
Here's a case in point, classic BBC, instead of narrative on the meteorological factors of the hot weather coming up from Spain and causing the ''brutal temperatures'' we get a definitive statement: ''Climate scientists say the answer is climate change.'' Where the fuck is the science:
UK heatwave: Why is it so hot?
The Met Office estimates that the extreme heat we are seeing has been made ten times more likely because of climate change.www.bbc.com
^Do you trust the alarmist BBC?
Here's a case in point, classic BBC, instead of narrative on the meteorological factors of the hot weather coming up from Spain and causing the ''brutal temperatures'' we get a definitive statement: ''Climate scientists say the answer is climate change.'' Where the fuck is the science:
Interestingly, the fires in Spain appear not to be caused by climate change:Wait a second. So now it’s the weather in Spain’s fault that it’s hot in the UK?
so its your fault! god damn dutch people.Interestingly, the fires in Spain appear not to be caused by climate change:
Dutch reforestation company takes responsibility for Spanish fire - DutchNews.nl
A Dutch reforestation company has taken responsibility for causing a major forest fire in Zaragoza in Spain which started on July 18 and has not yet been brought under control. In a statement on the company’s Spanish web page, Land Life said a spark from a digger ignited the dry vegetation and...www.dutchnews.nl
No no no it’s the heat that’s causing the fires, everyone knows that, even our ABD!
Where’s the “too” coming from? You don’t have an advanced degree.Net net: maybe you should try an advanced degree too!
But I tried. And it was good enough to get me a job you couldn’t get, apparently. So you should try too!Where’s the “too” coming from? You don’t have an advanced degree.
you see beli-buddy, if making false claims and then trying to explain them away is a viable business model for you, that's awesome! However, in a recreational forum, alternating posts between "you're an idiot, but I have a PhD" and "I don't have a phd/advanced degree/whatever, but you're an idiot" is just cringe
Lake Mead 2000-present
i don't know how any of you imbeciles can look at things like this and then say everything is just hunky dory.
Lake Mead 2000-present
i don't know how any of you imbeciles can look at things like this and then say everything is just hunky dory.
Shooey I don't want to sound belittling when I ask this but have you actually read through these articles and studies or did you just google the phrase "rising water levels in lakes", or something to that effect, in an effort to rebut the picture? See we've got a few people here that like to comment on articles while also not reading them so I just wanted to know where you were at.Sometimes the lakes lose water while other times they gain water. Look, here are reports and studies showing the lakes being more full than they have been in years.
The Great Lakes are filled to their brims, with no signs of receding
Satellite observed recent rising water levels of global lakes and reservoirs
To show l am not bias, here is a study which shows lake levels have increased but also talk about climate change.
Monitoring Lake Levels From Space: Preliminary Analysis With SWOT
Frontiers | Monitoring Lake Levels From Space: Preliminary Analysis With SWOT
<p>Lakes are an essential component of biogeochemical processes, and variations in lake level are regarded as indicators of climate change. For more than a d...www.frontiersin.org
Hey Grand Potentate You know what is really interesting? Some peer reviewed studies show the sea levels have lowered in various areas (south pacific) where other areas it has increased.
See? We can't say climate change is causing all these things. All the results are contradictory,ie, ice levels are increasing yet they are also decreasing, sea levels are rising yet they are also decreasing,lake levels are rising yet they are also decreasing.
But ultimately no-one is an expert, so we don't really know. Why? Because climate involves dozens or more areas of expertise, and the most qualified experts are perhaps experts in two areas at most, and this is why so many experts disagree about climate and climate change. You may say the consensus says 99% of experts agree, but that consensus was non scientific and included faulty samples, many scientists who disagreed weren't included in the sample, and the smaple questions were also misleading. That NASA study and others were not peer reviewed either, and they were all fraudulent.
It is not as simple as the media would like us to believe. I have also busted the media many times here on their lies about starving populations migrating to other countries by posting records of record crop levels in their countries.
because we offshored all our manufacturing to china in an effort to make rich people even richer.1). why are countries so insistent on relying on China for their energy policy?
because they're stupid. they're stupid people who are stupid.2). why are scientists with opposing views of climate change repressed and silenced?
could you please explain which specific marxist tactics are being deployed to silence those that believe climate change doesn't exist?Marxist tactics are used to stifle debate.
i think you're confusing china and the World BankThe U.N want a redistribution of wealth and power over to China and away from the democracies and capitalist countries,
again, this has to do with manufacturing.that is why China is exempt from Climate polices.
well if they actually wanted to pay for labor then we wouldn't be having these particular issues now would we?De-industrialise the west by regulation and a great increase in their business costs, that is how it is being done.
ah so you're against corporations as well. i don't know shooey that's a bit marxist-y. these criminals might be infecting your way of thought.When the smaller businesses are out the way the global body can heavily regulate big business and create a big socialist network.
you should do some more homework on the WEF. lots of chinese partners on this list:The world economic forum talks about this stuff.
excellent that you understand this shooey!You take away democracy by giving money to politicians (I have proof of that). They pander to lobby groups.
another great point!You undermine sovereignty and freedom by making countries dependent on technology, manufacturing and energy from China.
you lost me with this oneDo you know why China lost its freedoms? Because they were asleep like many in the western countries. People lose their freedoms when they snooze.
so soon? its only July.Not saying anymore. Have said enough for this year. I have made my views clear on this from time to time. Back to clothes for me.
Shooey I don't want to sound belittling when I ask this but have you actually read through these articles and studies or did you just google the phrase "rising water levels in lakes", or something to that effect, in an effort to rebut the picture? See we've got a few people here that like to comment on articles while also not reading them so I just wanted to know where you were at.
Too much stamocap everywhereah so you're against corporations as well. i don't know shooey that's a bit marxist-y. these criminals might be infecting your way of thought.
The MSM? Dude, get your sources in order!The audacious PR plot that seeded doubt about climate change
Thirty years ago, a bold plan was hatched to persuade people that climate change was not a problem.www.bbc.co.uk
British domestic architecture has also been shaped by idiosyncratic rules that contribute to its poor environmental credentials. For instance, in many parts of the UK, homes that face each other at the rear are required to be built 21 metres apart. This large distance means that instead of clustering buildings together around cool courtyards or shady streets, as is common in hotter climates, many homes in new neighbourhoods are directly exposed to the sun.
The 21-metre rule is, according to the Stirling prize-winning architect Annalie Riches, a bizarre hangover from 1902, originally intended to protect the modesty of Edwardian women. The urban designers Raymond Unwin and Barry Parker walked apart in a field until they could no longer see each other’s nipples through their shirts. The two men measured the distance between them to be 70ft (21 metres), and this became the distance that is still used today, 120 years later, to dictate how far apart many British homes should be built.
All over the map again, as ever with The Guardian.Edwardian morals, Thatcher and bad design – why Britain's homes are so hot | Phineas Harper
Compared with our European neighbours, Britain’s homebuilders disregard environmental performance, says Phineas Harper of Open Citywww.theguardian.com
interesting read for the brits or those wondering why the brits are so miserable. money quote:
Some of the best housing in the UK, for the masses, was the social council housing built in the late 50s up to the early 70s. Extremely well built, spacious with large back gardens. Much better built that the private housing estates, the Barratt's etc, in the late 70s and 80s with their naff front gardens and box sized bed rooms.
Whilst it's brutalist and was council owned and conceived, that area was always targeted to the professional middle classes.Not the Barbican Estate?