#wrongskin - The Greatest Trolling Of Social Justice Warriors Ever or Semi-Legitimate Thing?

Its right up your alley there bubba.

I guess not being sure it's serious is a testament to the liberal media's attempts at normalization of this gender bullshit.

Anyway, this has been around a while, when I was young we called these guys wiggers.

 
It is a spoof, yet no less valid than any other fauxpression we're being asked to put up with nowadays.
The timing is so perfect, as the haters of humanity were rolling in the aisles with their Jenner coup, bullying everyone into paying lip service to a crazy dude in drag and pretending it was a sane woman.
Truth will out.
Various lunatics experts keep a straight face while saying that race is an artificial construct... that can be differentiated by children at birth. Gender/sex, we're now told, is all in the mind. No, not your mind. The elitist cry-bullies get to dictate it all!

Oops, turns out the tubby, ugly, shrill lefties don't have an actual monopoly on being annoying pricks and claiming moral virtue for fantasy nonsense. In the same way that Bush regime neocons assigned obscene amounts of power for the executive branch to watch it used by their opponent, the radical left has set the rules and structure by which they will now be outsmarted and humiliated.
May this be the first shot in a long reign of terror on the wrongheaded nincompoops that relished in shaming the good normal people for so long. We've studied your game, and it's not that hard. The ante is upped to the ludicrous level, although who actually raised it there is debatable. May every "victim class" now be regarded with grave suspicion, as we never know if it's a goof.

Godfrey has self-identified as a bunch of "victim" classes. The SJWs absolutely cannot say anything negative about him, as "victimhood" is sainthood for the cultural marxists. Checkmate!
 
Various lunatics experts keep a straight face while saying that race is an artificial construct
2346AB9E-0A7E-4FCC-836E487E22032170_article.jpg
 
Well, race is largely an artificial construct.

When it comes down to it, we're all human and any differences in appearance between what we call races are typically as minor as the differences in appearance within races. We all have the same structure, the same number of teeth, the same number of ribs, the same number of bones and so on.

Such things as skin colour, hair colour, texture and so on are all very minor in the scheme of things. Genetically speaking, they're not very influential - they don't affect how we speak, how we think, how we act, how we eat and so on. Those things are cultural, rather than genetic.

Of course, that then raises the question as to whether race is more of a cultural construct, rather than a physical/genetic construct, and I think that we can strongly argue that it is. Of course, a large part of cultural identity is based on appearance, but I'd argue that is the result of a regrettable tendency on the part of humanity to judge things (including people) by superficial appearance, rather than by underlying quality.
 
Well, race is largely an artificial construct.

When it comes down to it, we're all human and any differences in appearance between what we call races are typically as minor as the differences in appearance within races. We all have the same structure, the same number of teeth, the same number of ribs, the same number of bones and so on.

Such things as skin colour, hair colour, texture and so on are all very minor in the scheme of things. Genetically speaking, they're not very influential - they don't affect how we speak, how we think, how we act, how we eat and so on. Those things are cultural, rather than genetic.

Of course, that then raises the question as to whether race is more of a cultural construct, rather than a physical/genetic construct, and I think that we can strongly argue that it is. Of course, a large part of cultural identity is based on appearance, but I'd argue that is the result of a regrettable tendency on the part of humanity to judge things (including people) by superficial appearance, rather than by underlying quality.

Disagree.

There is a reason all running backs are black.

There are minor differences between races such as fast and slow twitch muscles. They are minor, but at the sharp end of the stick you end up with an NFL with all black running backs. It can't be ignored.

Problem is researching this stuff is not PC.
 
Disagree.

There is a reason all running backs are black.

There are minor differences between races such as fast and slow twitch muscles. They are minor, but at the sharp end of the stick you end up with an NFL with all black running backs. It can't be ignored.

Problem is researching this stuff is not PC.

Sure, and pretty much all Japanese people have an epicanthic fold at the corner of their eyes.

Ultimately, though, how much do those things really matter?

Sure, in a running race, a tenth of a second can matter, but in larger society, and life in general, how much does it matter?

When we, as a society, look at differences between races, we tend largely to focus on drive, aptitude for work, achievement, education and so on. Those are the topics that mostly come up when discussing race, not "x can run fast". Where do things such as drive, aptitude for work, achievement and so on come from? It's cultural, not genetic.

So much of what we view as "race" is cultural, not genetic and yet we primarily decide a person's race based on first appearances.
 
Racial classification is arbitrary. The definition of white is fluid, as large groups once fell outside of caucasian: Irish, Italians, Scandinavians etc. Of course on the other hand, you can see Asiatic or African heritage in a friggin skull.
I've long argued that racial tension is largely about class, and really that is largely culture. That actually lends credence to the #wrongskin or transracial (must keep straight face) argument.
 
Genetically speaking, they're not very influential - they don't affect how we speak, how we think, how we act, how we eat and so on. Those things are cultural, rather than genetic.

Of course, that then raises the question as to whether race is more of a cultural construct, rather than a physical/genetic construct, and I think that we can strongly argue that it is. Of course, a large part of cultural identity is based on appearance, but I'd argue that is the result of a regrettable tendency on the part of humanity to judge things (including people) by superficial appearance, rather than by underlying quality.

Do you really believe that humans are the only species of mammal that hasn't evolved cognitive and behavioral variations in response to their environment? Literally every other species in the planet does so. Why are humans unique?
 
Racial classification is arbitrary. The definition of white is fluid, as large groups once fell outside of caucasian: Irish, Italians, Scandinavians etc. Of course on the other hand, you can see Asiatic or African heritage in a friggin skull.
I've long argued that racial tension is largely about class, and really that is largely culture. That actually lends credence to the #wrongskin or transracial (must keep straight face) argument.

I tend to agree with this, and was going to bring up the changing view of what constitutes various "races" over time in support of my point that the idea of race is more cultural than genetic.

I'll address the skull shape issue below.

Do you really believe that humans are the only species of mammal that hasn't evolved cognitive and behavioral variations in response to their environment? Literally every other species in the planet does so. Why are humans unique?

I'm not arguing that humans have not evolved to be different based on certain environments. What I am arguing is that those differences are minor - very minor - when we take an overall look at our physiology.

People from one area may have a different skin colour, slightly different skull shape, different hair texture or different eye shape or colour compared to people from another area, but when compared to our overall, human physique, those differences are very minor and you can find wide variants within those so-called racial groups. Are all African-Americans good at running? No. Are all Ethiopians great long-distance runners? No.

The physical differences that people bring up when discussing race aren't even enough to get people classified as different subspecies. In genetic terms, we are all Homo Sapien Sapiens. In fact, with the exception of a particular distinguishing feature, such as skin colour, there are as many differences within a particular "racial" group as there are between members of that group and another group, in terms of height, weight, overall shape and other physical qualities. Even things such as skin colour differ enormously - an African-American could be very dark or so light that they could be considered to be Caucasian (which is how the lady in the article on which all this furore is based was able to get away with pretending to be African-American).

It's depressing to think that humanity as a whole is still obsessed with physiognomy when such things should count for so little.
 
I'm not arguing that humans have not evolved to be different based on certain environments. What I am arguing is that those differences are minor - very minor - when we take an overall look at our physiology.

People from one area may have a different skin colour, slightly different skull shape, different hair texture or different eye shape or colour compared to people from another area, but when compared to our overall, human physique, those differences are very minor and you can find wide variants within those so-called racial groups. Are all African-Americans good at running? No. Are all Ethiopians great long-distance runners? No.

The physical differences that people bring up when discussing race aren't even enough to get people classified as different subspecies. In genetic terms, we are all Homo Sapien Sapiens. In fact, with the exception of a particular distinguishing feature, such as skin colour, there are as many differences within a particular "racial" group as there are between members of that group and another group, in terms of height, weight, overall shape and other physical qualities. Even things such as skin colour differ enormously - an African-American could be very dark or so light that they could be considered to be Caucasian (which is how the lady in the article on which all this furore is based was able to get away with pretending to be African-American).

It's depressing to think that humanity as a whole is still obsessed with physiognomy when such things should count for so little.

That's the thing, I don't believe it accounts for so little. They are small variations, but they exist and these are the very basis for evolution.

Had humans not started to migrate around the world, these changes over time would in fact result in sub-species. It's not going to happen anymore, more than likely a sort of tan skinned homogeneity will eventually happen over the next 1 or 2 thousand years (if we get there).

The minor differences do add up over the course of a lifetime. And there are clear strengths and weaknesses between different races, but again, you can't discuss it because it would be classified as racist. IQ is one measure, but not the only, but these are statistically significant differences:

700px-IQ_and_Global_Inequality.svg.png
 
Certain people like to talk about how different races have different IQs, but there's never been any convincing research that shows that as being the case.

It's not because of racism. It's because it's virtually impossible to establish because IQ has so many variables.

For example, there are some academics and others who have said, over the past decade, that African-Americans have lower IQs than Caucasians. This, of course, is accepted by some people because it accords with their expectations and it makes them feel comfortable - it means that African-Americans are often poor and less successful than white people because they are dumber, not because of long-standing societal inequality and discrimination that frequently denies them equal opportunities.

Intelligence is so hard to capture and it changes dramatically over a person's life. The more educated you are, and the more problems you learn that are similar to those used in IQ tests, the better you do in IQ tests and thus the higher your IQ score is. If you look at people who face systemic discrimination and who come from a background where their parents were poorly-educated and who are going to be poorly-educated themselves, then they're not going to do well on IQ tests. You'd see the same results, or worse, for Caucasian people if you conducted IQ tests in the backwaters of Mississippi or the Appalachian Mountains.

At the risk of wandering off on a tangent, the state school that my children attend does very, very well academically. That's not surprising, as it's located in a small catchment area next to a major university, in a suburb where the average house price is about $800 000. That means that the parents of kids at the school are highly educated and are either academics or fairly successful professionals and they all have a common interest in education. Such people concentrate on getting their kids to read at an early age, they involve themselves with their kids' homework, and most of the children assume that they, too, will follow in their parents' footsteps and go to university and become doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers or academics. Fully 85% of households at the school are in the top 25% of household income nationally. Significantly, the school is also very culturally diverse - there are children in my son's and daughter's classes from South Korea, China, HK, Singapore, Japan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India, Germany, France, the US, Canada, Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries. Australian-born children are actually in a minority at the school, as 51% of students are from overseas. Annual testing shows that the school's academic results are far above average in all testing areas.

Compare that to a school that my son's school soccer team plays against, about 25 minutes away from my son's school and located in a lower socio-economic area with a lot of blue-collar, unskilled and unemployed parents. The kids are mostly Anglo-Saxon/European/Caucasian background, but their annual test results are far below average. My mother taught at a nearby high school about 25 years ago. Things may have changed since then but I remember that my mother told me back then that there were quite a few kids at the high school who had no real intention of getting a job. Their parents were untrained and unemployed and they, in a sense, expected to follow their parents. There was one boy who told my mum that he wanted to go to university but - and this seemed unbelievable to me - his parents were opposed to it.

That's a very, very small sample, of course, as well as a personal anecdote from the past, and so it doesn't prove anything. What I do think it helps to illustrate, though, is that a person's genetic "race" - a person's physical characteristics such as the shape of their skull, the colour of their skin, and whether they have more fast-twitch muscles - has pretty much nothing to do with their ability to achieve and to be prosperous. That's cultural, rather than physical, and whilst you can generalise about culture, even that is something that can change from generation to generation and individual to individual.
 
Certain people like to talk about how different races have different IQs, but there's never been any convincing research that shows that as being the case.

It's not because of racism. It's because it's virtually impossible to establish because IQ has so many variables.

For example, there are some academics and others who have said, over the past decade, that African-Americans have lower IQs than Caucasians. This, of course, is accepted by some people because it accords with their expectations and it makes them feel comfortable - it means that African-Americans are often poor and less successful than white people because they are dumber, not because of long-standing societal inequality and discrimination that frequently denies them equal opportunities.

Intelligence is so hard to capture and it changes dramatically over a person's life. The more educated you are, and the more problems you learn that are similar to those used in IQ tests, the better you do in IQ tests and thus the higher your IQ score is. If you look at people who face systemic discrimination and who come from a background where their parents were poorly-educated and who are going to be poorly-educated themselves, then they're not going to do well on IQ tests. You'd see the same results, or worse, for Caucasian people if you conducted IQ tests in the backwaters of Mississippi or the Appalachian Mountains.

At the risk of wandering off on a tangent, the state school that my children attend does very, very well academically. That's not surprising, as it's located in a small catchment area next to a major university, in a suburb where the average house price is about $800 000. That means that the parents of kids at the school are highly educated and are either academics or fairly successful professionals and they all have a common interest in education. Such people concentrate on getting their kids to read at an early age, they involve themselves with their kids' homework, and most of the children assume that they, too, will follow in their parents' footsteps and go to university and become doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers or academics. Fully 85% of households at the school are in the top 25% of household income nationally. Significantly, the school is also very culturally diverse - there are children in my son's and daughter's classes from South Korea, China, HK, Singapore, Japan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India, Germany, France, the US, Canada, Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries. Australian-born children are actually in a minority at the school, as 51% of students are from overseas. Annual testing shows that the school's academic results are far above average in all testing areas.

Compare that to a school that my son's school soccer team plays against, about 25 minutes away from my son's school and located in a lower socio-economic area with a lot of blue-collar, unskilled and unemployed parents. The kids are mostly Anglo-Saxon/European/Caucasian background, but their annual test results are far below average. My mother taught at a nearby high school about 25 years ago. Things may have changed since then but I remember that my mother told me back then that there were quite a few kids at the high school who had no real intention of getting a job. Their parents were untrained and unemployed and they, in a sense, expected to follow their parents. There was one boy who told my mum that he wanted to go to university but - and this seemed unbelievable to me - his parents were opposed to it.

That's a very, very small sample, of course, as well as a personal anecdote from the past, and so it doesn't prove anything. What I do think it helps to illustrate, though, is that a person's genetic "race" - a person's physical characteristics such as the shape of their skull, the colour of their skin, and whether they have more fast-twitch muscles - has pretty much nothing to do with their ability to achieve and to be prosperous. That's cultural, rather than physical, and whilst you can generalise about culture, even that is something that can change from generation to generation and individual to individual.

Inflammatory uncomfortable question time - what evidence is there that black people have IQs as high as the rest of the world?
 
OMG ha ha ha ha ha ha

It's REAL.

She thinks she's black. She actually said it on the Today Show. Did you see that? Did you hear it? Rewind it a few times! She shinks she's black. Ha ha, it's over. Shark is jumped. We're insane.

 
OMG ha ha ha ha ha ha

It's REAL.

She thinks she's black. She actually said it on the Today Show. Did you see that? Did you hear it? Rewind it a few times! She shinks she's black. Ha ha, it's over. Shark is jumped. We're insane.



Which is another lie of hers, since she actually sued Howard University for discriminating against her for being white.
 

If she was black faking white, we couldn't say shit because it racist. We live in a looney bin.
 
Haterz, you have to r-e-s-p-e-c-t her desire to be black. To say she is white is to deny her civil right as a human being. This makes her happy and she faces much discrimination for being brave about who she really is. Support this hero of the wrongskin. She is a great example for the children.
 
All what matters in the world has been developed here in Europe by us.

We even got here the most important ever thing, the Church of Rome.
 
^ That was both an amazing, and very depressing book. I remember reading it at high school after my dad borrowed it from the library and passed it on to me to read.

I also read "Invisible Man" by Ralph Ellison around the same time, which was both very well written and also very depressing.

I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me. The invisibility to which I refer occurs because of a peculiar disposition of the eyes of those with whom I come in contact. A matter of the construction of their inner eyes...
 
^ That was both an amazing, and very depressing book. I remember reading it at high school after my dad borrowed it from the library and passed it on to me to read.

I also read "Invisible Man" by Ralph Ellison around the same time, which was both very well written and also very depressing.

I still have a vivid mental image of seeing the book for the first time on a rotating book display stand in my school library circa somewhere around grade 6, and yes, and very interesting yet sobering book
 
I guess not being sure it's serious is a testament to the liberal media's attempts at normalization of this gender bullshit.

Anyway, this has been around a while, when I was young we called these guys wiggers.


yo yo yo don't be all up in that. I do like how they talk in Comic Sans.
 
Inflammatory uncomfortable question time - what evidence is there that black people have IQs as high as the rest of the world?

Well, given that IQ is the construct of developed nations who seek to develop an illusory merit-based caste system the keep the smartish people busy (see: MENSA), I would suggest that black people have better things to do that buy in to what The Man is selling.
 
This #trans(whatever) thing will only work in the virtual world.
If you walk into any doctor's office, hospital or your local council office and try to pass off as a #transwhite/ #wrongskin or whatever you will sure find that it won't work when facing a #truewhite / #trueblack person behind the desk.
 
What I hear, and am too lazy to confirm, is that the claims of standardized tests being culturally or racially biased are dispelled by the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, a wordless visual pattern recognition test which yields similar racial variances.
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/ravensiii.pdf
Also, I am more familiar with Andy Breckman's SNL sketch for Eddie Murphy, "White Like Me"
Watch White Like Me From Saturday Night Live - NBC.com
If you walk into any doctor's office, hospital or your local council office and try to pass off as a #transwhite/ #wrongskin or whatever you will sure find that it won't work when facing a #truewhite / #trueblack person behind the desk.
Nonsense. People are passive and nonconfrontational in real life, and more importantly it only takes a few legal actions to establish precedent that it's as legally legit as the other legally exalted protected groups.
 
Nonsense. People are passive and nonconfrontational in real life, and more importantly it only takes a few legal actions to establish precedent that it's as legally legit as the other legally exalted protected groups.

Exactly. Now that you let people pretend to be chicks and dudes, logically you have to let them pretend to be black.
 
Rachel Dolezal draws ire of transracial adoptees - The Washington Post

LOL, identity politics:
But in interviews and Twitter hashtags, Dolezal has become the face of “transracial” — what, for many, is a new adjective on the battlefield of identity politics. And linking Dolezal with the word has offended many, among them those for whom growing up looking different is a familiar struggle: transracial adoptees.

And this was weird:

What the fuck kind of organization is this? And they need an "assistant" director?

Can our brethren here that #identify as Korean please chime in as to why this requires a club?
 
This #transracial thing might turn out to be a blessing in disguise as it will turn illegal immigration into legal immigration.
Because now everyone can show up at the border and claim: "I'm a #transAmerican/ #transEuropean. I may not look like one, but I feel like one, so you have to let me in".

BTW, after a long and hard thinking process I have decided that I was #transborn in the wrong period of time and that I see myself more as the German god named Donar. Please do not mock me as I am clearly not insane and because you have no idea how painful it is to be a nordic god in the body of a petty human being.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom