ConchitaWurst
Bespoke-Weather Forecaster
- Messages
- 6,067
found this on the other forvm
Ok guys, I warn you this will be a somewhat lengthy story. Sorry for that but I also did a management summary.
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY:
- Gianni Cerutti visited Patrizio Cappelli’s own workshop in 2012 and managed to get his hands on English fabrics that were commissioned and owned by Patrizio Cappelli with help of a dishonest employee of Patrizio Cappelli that was fired when Patrizio Cappelli found out;
- These fabrics then ended up in the Neapolitan workshop that makes (made?) Passaggio ties and also makes ties for Patrizio Cappelli and were made up as Passaggio ties;
- these were all English fabrics approximately 5-10 years old, which have been passed off by Gianni Cerutti as ancient Italian fabrics;
- not only has Gianni Cerutti been lying about these fabrics, he has also been willfully passing of a recent Garza as an old now extinct fabric;
- and has been selling inkjet printed silk as vintage fabric. Which has been identified as inkjet printed by quite a few authorities in the field;
- a lot of his current stock is end run designs by Greiff for houses like Gucci that he gets at seteria canepa who are big on inkjet printing;
- Whether you like the fabrics Gianni Cerutti currently has on offer is a matter of personal taste, and you may be willing to pay the premium he is charging, but it cannot be denied that Gianni Cerutti has been lying and bullshitting and even when caught red handed decided to continue with this practice.
- Saying that, we should hope that at the very best he is bullshitting, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he simply doesn’t know the difference between Italian and English silks, or inkjet and silk screen. This probably is even worse for someone in his trade.
FULL STORY
Well, it all started with a pretty innocent question in Gianni Cerutti’s thread. I saw him posting a tie that I knew all too well
http://www.styleforum.net/t/364005/Passaggio-cravatte-official-affiliate-thread/1350_30#post_7067117
first I thought it was probably a Google translate thing, blaming it on the language barrier and, that he was actually calling this a bespoke VINTAGE tie. I thought he might be referring to the way it was made. you know his standard bladibla ‘all made by hand like 100 years ago’.
Incidentally I actually discussed this exact tie with my friend lookingtoimprove when we met up at our tailors a few weeks before that. he mentioned it was one of his favorites and he would like to get a similar one at some point in time.
Lookingtoimprove and I commissioned this garza to be woven via Gianni when we met him when he had just started his tie venture. we were introduced to him via Riccardo Bestetti, the shoemaker. when we ordered our ties, Gianni told us he (the mill) needed a minimum of two ties. I was under the impression that the length that would be commissioned would be only sufficient for two ties. but Gianni must have had some spare meters left, since he at least made one more tie from this silk as shown in the picture he uploaded of his happy friend-customer. btw, I now understand mills will generally require a 6 meter minimum (sometimes even 18 meters) which is sufficient for 5 7-fold ties. I am totally ok with there being more than two of the same ties by the way.
I posted a comment in the thread referring to the special run he did for us, hoping that he would clarify the
matter and confirm it is was not an ancient thirst.
Gianni Cerutti then put up a smoke curtain and replied
suggesting this was some sort of extinct fabric, whilst clearly knowing this was one of the many patters from the books of seteria bianchi which can be remade anytime.
he clearly wasn't interested in a re-run - which would mean he had to explain that this wasn't an ancient thirst with many years on its shoulder at all - because he totally ignored the matter and went in his standard ‘ancient thirst’/’complimenti’/’molto elegante’/’gladiator two tone’ mode.
because this left me pretty puzzled I got on the phone with the mill to see whether these re-runs were still possible. sure, no probs! I sent them a picture of the brown/orange garza pattern and they then very kindly sent clippings of all the non-proprietary colourways.
at the same time I contacted Patrizio Cappelli where I get another fair share of my ties and he agreed to make the ties and order the silk from the mill provided there would be interest in at least 6 meters. the interest check I did here http://www.styleforum.net/t/387153/vintage-like-special-run-garza-to-be-made-by-patrizio-cappelli-3-colourways-already-good-to-go/0_30 and order with the mill has been placed by Patrizio Cappelli for three colourways
you all probably heard of Patrizio Cappelli. For those who haven’t, he is the tie maker that is not honestly paying affiliate vendor fees which would allow him to spam the forum with nonsense and bullshit, but nonetheless gets some nice spinoff from all of this and sometimes even favorable reviews without asking for them. A friendly reference was made to him here:
when telling him the story about the garza, Patrizio Cappelli asked me whether I recalled he had already warned me for Passaggio about two years ago when he saw me wearing the first tie I got from Passaggio
When he warned me in 2012 I believe he did not do it in an attempt to make sure I would only get his ties from then on (because he knows I also get ties from tie-your-tie, marinella, antonio muro – who makes the rtw ties for leonardo bugelli which is one of the shirtmakers I use, and some others) but really because he was upset.
at the time I took his comment with a grain of salt, and thought that what he was saying was that Passaggio was copying him. At that point I didn’t discuss the matter with Patrizio Cappelli in any more detail. I probably got distracted by the fabrics in his shop and he didn’t push any further. but now that we were talking about the special garza run he explained that the cashmere pow was not copied by Passaggio but got ‘lost’ in his workshop. and it was in fact not the only piece of fabric that went missing.
Patrizio told me he uses two workshops. One is his own. The other he uses when there is overflow and he gets his ties made there to the exact same specifications as he would if they are made in his own workshop. The ‘overflow workshop’ is also used by other prominent brands [think rubinacci etc.] for their bespoke ties. This incidentally is also the workshop that makes (made?) the Passaggio ties.
At some point in 2012 when Gianni Cerutti was just starting out, or maybe just before that, he visited Patrizio’s own workshop [Gianni Cerutti at that point was still working as a fashion journalist, his initial profession]. This is where Patrizio Cappelli stored the fabrics in question. He told me that exactly at that day the fabrics went missing. According to Patrizio Cappelli these were obscured with the help of an employee that was laid off by Patrizio Cappelli when he found out. Then all these fabrics then turned up at the ‘overflow workshop’ and were made up as Passaggio ties.
Patrizio Cappelli says it must have been pretty clear to Gianni Cerutti these were Patrizio Cappelli’s fabrics. They were stored in Patrizio’s workshop and they had his name tags on it like this:
more in the next post.
Ok guys, I warn you this will be a somewhat lengthy story. Sorry for that but I also did a management summary.
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY:
- Gianni Cerutti visited Patrizio Cappelli’s own workshop in 2012 and managed to get his hands on English fabrics that were commissioned and owned by Patrizio Cappelli with help of a dishonest employee of Patrizio Cappelli that was fired when Patrizio Cappelli found out;
- These fabrics then ended up in the Neapolitan workshop that makes (made?) Passaggio ties and also makes ties for Patrizio Cappelli and were made up as Passaggio ties;
- these were all English fabrics approximately 5-10 years old, which have been passed off by Gianni Cerutti as ancient Italian fabrics;
- not only has Gianni Cerutti been lying about these fabrics, he has also been willfully passing of a recent Garza as an old now extinct fabric;
- and has been selling inkjet printed silk as vintage fabric. Which has been identified as inkjet printed by quite a few authorities in the field;
- a lot of his current stock is end run designs by Greiff for houses like Gucci that he gets at seteria canepa who are big on inkjet printing;
- Whether you like the fabrics Gianni Cerutti currently has on offer is a matter of personal taste, and you may be willing to pay the premium he is charging, but it cannot be denied that Gianni Cerutti has been lying and bullshitting and even when caught red handed decided to continue with this practice.
- Saying that, we should hope that at the very best he is bullshitting, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he simply doesn’t know the difference between Italian and English silks, or inkjet and silk screen. This probably is even worse for someone in his trade.
FULL STORY
Well, it all started with a pretty innocent question in Gianni Cerutti’s thread. I saw him posting a tie that I knew all too well
Gianni Cerutti said:And here's another one of our bespoke vintage ties at the neck of a great friend of mine customer! We have always done all unlined and all hemmed by hand.
![]()
http://www.styleforum.net/t/364005/Passaggio-cravatte-official-affiliate-thread/1350_30#post_7067117
first I thought it was probably a Google translate thing, blaming it on the language barrier and, that he was actually calling this a bespoke VINTAGE tie. I thought he might be referring to the way it was made. you know his standard bladibla ‘all made by hand like 100 years ago’.
Incidentally I actually discussed this exact tie with my friend lookingtoimprove when we met up at our tailors a few weeks before that. he mentioned it was one of his favorites and he would like to get a similar one at some point in time.
Lookingtoimprove and I commissioned this garza to be woven via Gianni when we met him when he had just started his tie venture. we were introduced to him via Riccardo Bestetti, the shoemaker. when we ordered our ties, Gianni told us he (the mill) needed a minimum of two ties. I was under the impression that the length that would be commissioned would be only sufficient for two ties. but Gianni must have had some spare meters left, since he at least made one more tie from this silk as shown in the picture he uploaded of his happy friend-customer. btw, I now understand mills will generally require a 6 meter minimum (sometimes even 18 meters) which is sufficient for 5 7-fold ties. I am totally ok with there being more than two of the same ties by the way.
I posted a comment in the thread referring to the special run he did for us, hoping that he would clarify the
matter and confirm it is was not an ancient thirst.
C&A said:That's indeed a nice tie! Is it the same as the special run you did for Looking to Improve and me about two years ago?
![]()
Gianni Cerutti then put up a smoke curtain and replied
Gianni Cerutti said:Thank you so much for your kind post. It is the same grenadine I had done two years ago for you. It was the last piece and now it's finished. I find it always wonderful and important. If I had to find a name to call this the grenadine princess.
suggesting this was some sort of extinct fabric, whilst clearly knowing this was one of the many patters from the books of seteria bianchi which can be remade anytime.
C&A said:Hi Gianni , yes I recall you showing us this great pattern -a true princess indeed- and several others beautiful garza patterns from the Bianchi garza book, or was it Fermo Fossati, which could all be remade. Would be great if we could do another rerun, in another color or a different pattern, mayby a special one for styleforum?
It is a great tie. Especially for summer.
he clearly wasn't interested in a re-run - which would mean he had to explain that this wasn't an ancient thirst with many years on its shoulder at all - because he totally ignored the matter and went in his standard ‘ancient thirst’/’complimenti’/’molto elegante’/’gladiator two tone’ mode.
because this left me pretty puzzled I got on the phone with the mill to see whether these re-runs were still possible. sure, no probs! I sent them a picture of the brown/orange garza pattern and they then very kindly sent clippings of all the non-proprietary colourways.
at the same time I contacted Patrizio Cappelli where I get another fair share of my ties and he agreed to make the ties and order the silk from the mill provided there would be interest in at least 6 meters. the interest check I did here http://www.styleforum.net/t/387153/vintage-like-special-run-garza-to-be-made-by-patrizio-cappelli-3-colourways-already-good-to-go/0_30 and order with the mill has been placed by Patrizio Cappelli for three colourways
you all probably heard of Patrizio Cappelli. For those who haven’t, he is the tie maker that is not honestly paying affiliate vendor fees which would allow him to spam the forum with nonsense and bullshit, but nonetheless gets some nice spinoff from all of this and sometimes even favorable reviews without asking for them. A friendly reference was made to him here:
Gianni Cerutti said:[…]
Meanwhile, tomorrow alert directly administer Styleforum because I noticed that there are some people with multiple accounts playing criticize honest craftsmen.
They do this because behind this there are economic interests to their advantage. And this I speak from personal experience, I've lived on my skin. And of course because I have proof . And I will say that there are also brands that do not advertise and write quietly . While I honest to pay for advertising.
when telling him the story about the garza, Patrizio Cappelli asked me whether I recalled he had already warned me for Passaggio about two years ago when he saw me wearing the first tie I got from Passaggio
When he warned me in 2012 I believe he did not do it in an attempt to make sure I would only get his ties from then on (because he knows I also get ties from tie-your-tie, marinella, antonio muro – who makes the rtw ties for leonardo bugelli which is one of the shirtmakers I use, and some others) but really because he was upset.
at the time I took his comment with a grain of salt, and thought that what he was saying was that Passaggio was copying him. At that point I didn’t discuss the matter with Patrizio Cappelli in any more detail. I probably got distracted by the fabrics in his shop and he didn’t push any further. but now that we were talking about the special garza run he explained that the cashmere pow was not copied by Passaggio but got ‘lost’ in his workshop. and it was in fact not the only piece of fabric that went missing.
Patrizio told me he uses two workshops. One is his own. The other he uses when there is overflow and he gets his ties made there to the exact same specifications as he would if they are made in his own workshop. The ‘overflow workshop’ is also used by other prominent brands [think rubinacci etc.] for their bespoke ties. This incidentally is also the workshop that makes (made?) the Passaggio ties.
At some point in 2012 when Gianni Cerutti was just starting out, or maybe just before that, he visited Patrizio’s own workshop [Gianni Cerutti at that point was still working as a fashion journalist, his initial profession]. This is where Patrizio Cappelli stored the fabrics in question. He told me that exactly at that day the fabrics went missing. According to Patrizio Cappelli these were obscured with the help of an employee that was laid off by Patrizio Cappelli when he found out. Then all these fabrics then turned up at the ‘overflow workshop’ and were made up as Passaggio ties.
Patrizio Cappelli says it must have been pretty clear to Gianni Cerutti these were Patrizio Cappelli’s fabrics. They were stored in Patrizio’s workshop and they had his name tags on it like this:
more in the next post.
Last edited:



