Agreeable Menswear Post Of The Day

rdiaz said:
I'm certainly suspecting a 140 cm wide jacket takes up more cloth than a 100 cm one
Click to expand...

img475-Stoffverbrauch.webp


Quick translation for non-German speaking folk:
As a rough guide (changes due to style and needed inlays are very likely):

Version 1: chest + waist + trouser length = normal cloth length
Version 2: chest + seat + trouser length = generous cloth length
Version 3: (chest + waist + jacket length + waist coat length + trouser length + inseam length + seat) divided by 2 = exact cloth length

Wider pattern pieces require a change of the layout on the cloth. For longer pieces you can use the same layout as for normal ones.
 
Glad to see you are back in form again.

What does it means?


The Shooman said:
I have read a lot of those types of cell phone studies and continue to do so. Thanks for the paper, l will have a nice read of it. I also love to look up all the references and read the papers, l have probably read most of them.

A man who is head of the air force computer systems tells me that cell phones are harmless because they don't use square wave radiation, BUT studies have shown that cellphones have contributed to sperm damage in animals and humans, so we do know they are not harmless, however proving they cause disease s an entirely different matter. It's a very interesting subject.
Click to expand...

He works for the army and he is lying you as they lie to everybody.

As true ecologist anti NWO, I got circa 26.000 studies of how the EMF , the electromagnetic radiation harms people, animals and plants. Pubmed is plenty of those.



US NAVY 1971 desclassifed dossier about this illness
http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Navy_Radiowave_Brief.pdf

Risk of diabetes from wifi or smart meters https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23994945

microwave damage
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440565/

New York Times Dr. Mercola
https://www.sott.net/article/361010-Calcium-channels-free-radicals-and-the-effects-of-EMF-explained


France, Chipre, Israel and soon Denmark have banned wifi on schools.

https://wirelessaction.wordpress.com/resources/
Law Massachusetts



http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/publi...less-radiation-addressed-five-mass-bills.html

wireless causes cancer

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2017/9218486/

http://www.sbwire.com/press-release...ent-into-public-elementary-schools-778002.htm

http://www.theecologist.org/News/ne...lution_reflects_growing_evidence_of_harm.html
No wonder you don´t see anymore small birds or bees on town...

The illness called Microwave Syndrome or Radar Syndrome is well know since 1932 on all the ( no wonder the country) armies who used radars, radar works at 2,45 GHZ, the same frequency of the criminal wifi and the same frequence of the microwave woven, called before radar woven.

Most of the radar operators got ill with this Syndrome and need to get back to their homes or could not be close to any electricity cable. Imagine nowadays when there is any place free of that frequency... He is head of the air force and ignores this?
Compulsive liar... psychopath.

Also wifi emits pulses at 10.10 hz to find other connections around, that frequency is used on the human body several things, LPC technology, as European smart dumb meters do sends on the cables 50 hz low frequency pulses. No wonder a lot of people is getting sick.
Have you ever seen the tv add of the “ pet reject” gadget to get rid of coacraches? Is exactly the same, 50 hz pulses on all your house cables.

If it can paralice the nervous system of an insect, then is not “harmless"




That frequency is the one that resonates or makes boil water.

80% of body material is water.

Why this frequency has been chosen while was well know it was not safe?

National Socialist Germany got a lot of studies about, as they lost the war, this was called
“ mad scientist stuff"

The truth is out there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMCjEs9oxE

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...trols-non-ehs-300566854.html?tc=eml_cleartime
unnamed-11.webp
 
Last edited:
He is now. Casino Royale and QoS has some decent kit but the recent combination of costume designer and Tom Ford sausage skins is rank. Fiennes is a crap actor. He’s OK as M cos he doesn’t have much to do. His Timothy Everest suits are streets ahead of Craig’s.
 
Great White Snark said:
He is now. Casino Royale and QoS has some decent kit but the recent combination of costume designer and Tom Ford sausage skins is rank. Fiennes is a crap actor. He’s OK as M cos he doesn’t have much to do. His Timothy Everest suits are streets ahead of Craig’s.
Click to expand...

Fiennes managed to get into the film industry though his uncle's connections, and for the swoon factor. Otherwise, he's shite. The James Bond franchise is shite. People who write disquisitions on James Bond are shite. People who analyse James Bond's suits, as if James Bond\s suits were not essentially off-the-rack creations by shite designers, are shite. Hell, even MI6 is shite. ISIS and China are running circles round them.
 
TheUntermensch said:
Fiennes managed to get into the film industry though his uncle's connections, and for the swoon factor. Otherwise, he's shite. The James Bond franchise is shite. People who write disquisitions on James Bond are shite. People who analyse James Bond's suits, as if James Bond\s suits were not essentially off-the-rack creations by shite designers, are shite. Hell, even MI6 is shite. ISIS and China are running circles round them.
Click to expand...
Other than that - you are a big fan of JB?
 
TheUntermensch said:
Fiennes managed to get into the film industry though his uncle's connections, and for the swoon factor. Otherwise, he's shite. The James Bond franchise is shite. People who write disquisitions on James Bond are shite. People who analyse James Bond's suits, as if James Bond\s suits were not essentially off-the-rack creations by shite designers, are shite. Hell, even MI6 is shite. ISIS and China are running circles round them.
Click to expand...

The same could be said about Oliver Reed, but nobody held that against him.

The James Bond franchise was the ultimate in the spy caper film with multiple exotic locations that had it's era in the 60s and 70s. Now that global travel is no longer exotic or that colourful, that franchse seems lost to me. It's lost the humour, substituted stunts for computerized graphics and now we have a drab bond who's more council house than educated Naval Commander.

I agree though, there's better spies out there:

59959b_lg.webp


kobal_howardFirstoftheFew450-4688.webp


operation_kid_brother.webp

untitled.webp


Our-Man-Flint-poster.webp

84BC1339-A2A5-4404-AAF2-4C8339CBC234.webp
 
People nowadays seem to forget that in the 60's and 70's going to a bespoke tailor was a much more common thing than today.
And yes, Daniel Craig looks shite in his Tom Ford suits, but that is mostly Tom Ford's fault. He may be good at marketing, but he obviously knows little about tailoring and a good fit. How can you comfortably save the world when you have to worry about your jacket buttons flying off or your seat seam ripping open when leaning forward?
 
TheUntermensch said:
People read too much into the wardrobe of the James Bond franchise.
Click to expand...
IIRC, James Bond wears suits only on a few occasions in his films. Mostly when meeting M and/ or at social events. Most of the time he wears more casual/ stealth/ combat related garments, diving/ swimming gear or nothing at all.
The suit part is only a big thing because it's kind of disappearing in our days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top Bottom