- Messages
- 1,290
It's funny how some people think America is the most racist country on earth, yet accept allegations against black people they don't like without any sort of scrutiny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See, racist America likes our negroes to be silly and harmless. When they go espousing ideologies that risk seriously escalating their own condition, they get taken down.It's funny how some people think America is the most racist country on earth, yet accept allegations against black people they don't like without any sort of scrutiny.
It's funny how some people think America is the most racist country on earth, yet accept allegations against black people they don't like without any sort of scrutiny.
I posted a thread about experiences trumping possessions and got basically unified response that everyone is a provincial hermit who loves materials. So i wouldn't really rely on anyone here's perception of Americas standing in the racist department. America is one of the least racist places you can possibly go. We just talk about it out in the open.It's funny how some people think America is the most racist country on earth, yet accept allegations against black people they don't like without any sort of scrutiny.
I'd like to preface this by saying everyone in this thread is retarded, including possibly me.
I posted a thread about experiences trumping possessions and got basically unified response that everyone is a provincial hermit who loves materials. So i wouldn't really rely on anyone here's perception of Americas standing in the racist department. America is one of the least racist places you can possibly go. We just talk about it out in the open.
It's funny how some people think America is the most racist country on earth, yet accept allegations against black people they don't like without any sort of scrutiny.
Maybe, but it's really really hard to feel sorry for him. Makes you wonder how much other stuff gets covered up like this.So the National Enquirer basically blackmailed Cosby into an interview?
He's a piece of shit, and most pieces of shit are pretty much the same under the hood.
So you equate adulterers and rapists? While I don't condone adultery, I hardly think it's comparable to rape. Some of the most beloved, iconic figures in recent American history were well-known adulterers: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King. Some might wish to add Bill Clinton to this list. I don't much care for him, but he is popular.
I don't think that is necessarily true. There are all sorts of marriages, and ideas of fidelity.
I don't think rape is socially acceptable in any circle of modern life.Same goes for rape.
I don't think rape is socially acceptable in any circle of modern life.
So who is ok with honor rape? Obviously not the victim. Most non Islamic societies are probably not ok with it either. This brings up the question of who does an act have to be accepted by to be considered acceptable?
Also you linked a non existing page.
There are people out there who eat other people, so obviously those that do feel it's all fine.
There are people out there who fuck and get fucked by horses, so obviously those that do feel it's all fine.
If morality is relative than I can kill people and be moral, so long as I feel that way - right?
Saying that morality is relative is a fallacious statement, there is more in the equation then the feelings of people doing the actions. I gave the example of the rape victim not feeling it was fine, what makes the feelings of the rapist more important than the victim when discussing morality?
Cheating by definition is done outside the bounds of acceptable to the party being cheated on. Otherwise, it's not a cheating event. It's sex outside of a marriage. If you are ok with it and it's clearly understood, then you can't necessarily call it cheating.
Rape has been and acceptable in some social circles, for example honor rape still exists. And historically droit de seigneur: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_du_seigneu.
Lastly, in the past there is overwhelming evidence of rape and pillage by invaders across many cultures. It was socially accepted that part of the spoils going to the victors was raping the village women.
I knew there was a reason I liked you.Also, moral relativism isn't really a thing. And I say this as basically an amoral person.
It's cheating when framed with the general definition of monogamous marriage.
Anyway, I specifically said modern society. If you consider any of those societies modern than we aren't really going to agree.
Also, moral relativism isn't really a thing. And I say this as basically an amoral person.
Most marriages are structured to be monogamous.
If those societies live in today's age, they are living in modern times. They may be backwards from your perspective, but that's a value judgement on your part and does not reflect their beliefs. The fact is it has survived.
Most are, no question. You just can't talk in absolutes though because some certainly aren't.
To the second part, uh, no. If they still practice customs of the previous couple millennia they aren't "modern", they just happen to exist currently. That isn't the same thing. It has nothing to do with values, it's just objective fact.
I said modern society. It means one with modern practices. I made no judgement on the morality of the practices one way or another. There are objectively modern practices, again that's fact, not judgement.Moderns times = now. I doesn't mean modern thinking or sensibilities which is a value judgement. Yes, its not the same thing.
I said modern society. It means one with modern practices. I made no judgement on the morality of the practices one way or another. There are objectively modern practices, again that's fact, not judgement.
Modern is pretty easy to define. It's actually in the dictionary.
I object to my personal details being made available to all on the Internet.If you are a hermit in the woods and occasionally slip down into society, snatch a person, eat him, .
Who am I supposed to be defending here? The rapists or the cannibals? I'm fine for either.
I object to my personal details being made available to all on the Internet.
Is there a moderator here?
I'm lost.
Tell me about it.
Back on track fellas.
Drugging raping scumbag or innocent victim of left-wing character-smearers aligned with money and/or attention seeking ho's?
Why not both?
Well, yes. That's how this whole topic was dredged back up by the media. Some comedian brought up old rape allegations and Cosby's moralizing, with the focus largely on the latter.Could anyone really have been put out by his telling black youth to shape up?