Cop Tyranny Thread

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/11/cleveland_police_officer_shoot_6.html

Cleveland police officer shoots 12-year-old boy carrying BB gun
Loading Photo Gallery

Print
Cory Shaffer | Northeast Ohio Media Group By Cory Shaffer | Northeast Ohio Media Group
Follow on Twitter
on November 22, 2014 at 7:23 PM, updated November 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM


CLEVELAND, Ohio -- A rookie Cleveland police officer shot a 12-year-old boy outside a city recreation center late Saturday afternoon after the boy pulled a BB gun from his waistband, police said.

Police were responding to reports of a male with a gun outside Cudell Recreation Center at Detroit Avenue and West Boulevard about 3:30 p.m., Deputy Chief of Field Operations Ed Tomba said.

A rookie officer and a 10-15 year veteran pulled into the parking lot and saw a few people sitting underneath a pavilion next to the center. The rookie officer saw a black gun sitting on the table, and he saw the boy pick up the gun and put it in his waistband, Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association President Jeffrey Follmer said.

The officer got out of the car and told the boy to put his hands up. The boy reached into his waistband, pulled out the gun and the rookie officer fired two shots, Tomba said.

Tomba said the child did not threaten the officer verbally or physically.

At least one of the shots hit the child in the stomach. He was rushed to MetroHealth Medical Center in serious condition. His current condition was not immediately known.

As a handful of community activists shouted obscenities from behind a group of reporters, Tomba said the incident was "very, very tragic."

"We don't come to work everyday and want to use force on anybody," Tomba said. "That's not what our job is. We're part of this community."

The department's use of deadly force investigation team, made up of officers from the homicide and internal affairs units, members of the city's Office of Professional Standards and the city and Cuyahoga County prosecutors office, will determine if the officer was justified in shooting the boy.

Tomba promised the investigation would be open.

"When an officer gives a command, we expect it to be followed," Tomba said. "The way it looks like right now, it wasn't followed, but we're going to continue our investigation."

The shooting comes as the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating the department to determine if it regularly uses excessive force against its citizens.

Northeast Ohio Media Group will continue to update this story.
 
http://www.sltrib.com/news/1842489-155/killings-by-utah-police-outpacing-gang?fullpage=1

Killings by Utah police outpacing gang, drug, child-abuse homicides
By ERIN ALBERTY
First Published Nov 23 2014 10:36AM • Updated 5 hours ago
dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls

1. Officer Bron Cruz' body camera shows him beginning to raise his gun toward Dillon Taylor as Taylor walks away. 2. Taylor continues to face away from Cruz. Cruz can be heard ordering Taylor, "Get your hands out, now." 3. Taylor turns to face Cruz, apparently with both hands in his pants, one in front and one in back as Cruz continues to order Taylor to show his hands. 4. Taylor backs away from Cruz and begins to move his left hand out of his pants. Taylor can be heard saying something, which investigators interpreted as "Nah, fool." 5. Taylor lifts his shirt as Cruz shouts, "Get 'em out!" and shoots Taylor. 6. Taylor's shirt begins to fall as Cruz shoots him a second time.
Over a five-year period, data show that fatal shootings by police officers in Utah ranked second only to homicides of intimate partners.

In the past five years, more Utahns have been killed by police than by gang members.

Or drug dealers. Or from child abuse.

And so far this year, deadly force by police has claimed more lives — 13, including a Saturday shooting in South Jordan — than has violence between spouses and dating partners.

As the tally of fatal police shootings rises, law enforcement watchdogs say it is time to treat deadly force as a potentially serious public safety problem.

"The numbers reflect that there could be an issue, and it’s going to take a deeper understanding of these shootings," said Chris Gebhardt, a former police lieutenant and sergeant who served in Washington, D.C., and in Utah, including six years on SWAT teams and several training duties. "It definitely can’t be written off as citizen groups being upset with law enforcement."


Through October, 45 people had been killed by law enforcement officers in Utah since 2010, accounting for 15 percent of all homicides during that period.

A Salt Lake Tribune review of nearly 300 homicides, using media reports, state crime statistics, medical-examiner records and court records, shows that use of force by police is the second-most common circumstance under which Utahns kill each other, surpassed only by intimate partner violence.

Saturday’s shooting, which occurred after an officer responded to a trespassing call, remains under investigation.

Nearly all of the fatal shootings by police have been deemed by county prosecutors to be justified. Only one — the 2012 shooting of Danielle Willard by West Valley City police — was deemed unjustified, and the subsequent criminal charge was thrown out last month by a judge.

Does that mean such deaths should be treated as the inevitable cost of keeping police and the public safe?

"Police are trained and expected to react to deadly threats. As many deadly threats emerge is the exact amount of times police will respond," wrote Ian Adams, a West Jordan police officer and spokesman for the Utah Fraternal Order of Police. "The onus is on the person being arrested to stop trying to assault and kill police officers and the innocent public. … Why do some in society continue to insist the problem lies with police officers?"

But Robert Wadman, a criminal justice professor at Weber State University and former chief of the Omaha, Neb., police department, said the factors leading up to the decision to shoot a subject are more subtle than what prosecutors consider when reviewing the legal justification. Under Utah law, an officer is justified if at the moment of the shooting the officer reasonably believes deadly force is necessary to prevent death or serious injury.

"Sometimes the line between is it legal and is it necessary becomes difficult to distinguish," Wadman said. "In the judgment of the officer, ‘Is my life in jeopardy? Yes.’ At that point in time, they’re legally grounded in using deadly force. But the question is, is it necessary? That’s something that needs to be firmly addressed, for example, in training."



‘Officers may use any force available’

The Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) division of the Utah Department of Safety oversees, directly or indirectly, the basic training of all police recruits in Utah. At its four-month academy, cadets are introduced to the use-of-force continuum, a diagram showing officer force options — simply showing up at the scene; verbal commands, touching or holding a subject, pepper spray, police dogs, baton, Taser, or deadly force — arrayed in a circle for the officer’s selection.

"Officers may use any force available provided they can justify the reasonableness of force used," the manual states.

Adams maintains that officers in Utah typically use less force than may be justified.

"In the vast majority of cases where lethal force was a possibility, the suspect was successfully arrested without the use of lethal force," Adam said. "Of course, these cases do not garner much attention from the press, politicians, or the public."

He pointed to FBI data showing Utah officers make about 125,000 arrests per year, versus an average of nine fatal shootings by police.

"Those incidents where police were forced to take [deadly] action represent the truly abnormal," Adams said.

Rare or not, Gebhardt said, each shooting demands a high level of scrutiny because the impact is so high.

"There is an absolute time when you need to go hands on, need to Taser them, need to resort to deadly force," Gebhardt said. "But there are really less times than what’s going on. There’s an opportunity to de-escalate more of these situations. Officers instead are escalating these situations themselves."

Such cases are known as "police-created urgencies," said Brian Buchner, president of the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE).

"[It’s] where force may be legally justified for an officer, who, but for their bad decisions and bad tactics, wouldn’t be in that position to begin with. There may be issues involving the officers’ decision-making that are worth noting and may be problematic," Buchner said.

Scott Stephenson, director of POST, said cadets receive formal training in de-escalation, including a 12-hour class on conflict resolution, eight hours on mental illness response and a session on dealing with subjects with "excited delirium" from drug use.

"We teach officers to use lower levels of force, if at all possible," Stephenson said.

But that coursework gives way to continuing training that focuses almost exclusively on using force, Gebhardt said.

"When they receive the verbal Judo class, it’s one time, done and over with," Gebhardt said. "Baton training, OC spray, firearms are done on a quarterly, annual, or two-year basis. They should integrate that de-escalation training into it. When a situation deteriorates, the officer reverts to their training. … Departments really need to own, from the top down, de-escalation. They need to stress and emphasize de-escalation with the officers."

Stephenson countered that officers are highly motivated to de-escalate where possible.

"No officer wants to take somebody’s life. No officer wants to be involved in that situation," Stephenson said. "Everyone dreads it. But it could happen in any moment in their shift. That alone creates stress when you come in contact with the public."



‘This cycle has got to be broken’

But that stress may be out of proportion to the actual risk posed by the public — and a catalyst for use of force, Wadman said.

"It’s my concern, both as a former police chief and an instructor, that we’ve lost touch with the communities that we serve," Wadman said. "If they’re in their cars, going from call to call with their windows rolled up, it’s a much more fearful situation than if they are in the communities. This cycle has got to be broken, where police are becoming more and more afraid of the communities they serve. When you work closely with people, you don’t have that."

Adams said police can’t know when they’ll be assaulted. Although Utah has one of the nation’s lowest violent crime rates, the five most recent years of FBI data show there are about 630 assaults annually on officers in Utah, making the state’s assault-per-officer rate the 10th highest in the country.

"Utah does not have a police force problem, it has a violent criminal problem," said Adams, who this summer shot and wounded a man who pointed a fake gun at him during a foot chase. "Is it too much to ask that society support officers who are violently attacked? Is it too much to ask that an officer, after sacrificing his mental and physical health for the community, can expect that the community then gather round and support him during one of the most devastating moments of his life?"

Scrutiny is the only way for police to learn from their most tragic encounters, Gebhardt said.

"Law enforcement gets very upset with Monday morning quarterbacking," he said. "They shouldn’t. They should be embracing these events, debriefing these events. ‘What can we do better? What can we train on that needs to be a component of every use of force scenario?’ "

Accountability also is critical for continued cooperation with the public, Wadman said.

"Police organizations should be in a posture where they’re doing everything they can to have a quality working relationship with the community, so there’s no question in a community’s mind that the officer’s actions were in line with the law and necessary."



‘We have people who really want to see the truth’

In most Utah police agencies, a shooting is investigated by county prosecutors to find whether it was legally justified, and also by the agency itself to determine whether the officer’s actions complied with department policies.

That exposes investigations to conflicts of interest, Gebhardt said.

"You’ve got a very close relationship between officer, prosecutor and judge in this state," he said.

Even if officers and prosecutors are able to separate their working relationships from police shooting investigations, the mere perception of conflict hurts the credibility of the findings, Wadman said.

"I don’t want to defame the quality of those investigations, but in that process there is a gap in the release of information that I think increases the mistrust between the community and police," Wadman said.

The investigation into the already-controversial shooting of 22-year-old Darrien Hunt by Saratoga Springs police faced renewed criticism as additional information came to light in the weeks following the Utah County Attorney’s Office finding that the shooting was justified.

While police previously said they didn’t know whether the officers were wearing body cameras, an investigative report showed that one of the officers did have a camera but failed to turn it on.

Investigators did not review testimony of a witness whose initial statement indicated Hunt swung a sword at police before he was shot on Sept. 10, but who later told reporters that he saw no aggressive action by Hunt.

And Hunt’s aunt, Cindy Moss, said the family has obtained a photo of the shot-out windshield of a car parked at the scene, marked with a police evidence tag, countering prosecutors’ reports that the only stray-bullet impact was into the ground.

"There’s inconsistencies through the whole thing," said Moss, who has called for legislation requiring civilian oversight boards and body cameras for police.

"By having a citizen review board, we have people who really want to see the truth — not to be covering it up and making it look like it’s fine. And that’s what it truly looks like at this point."

But civilian oversight does not appear to be a priority outside of Salt Lake City and West Valley City, the only two cities in Utah that have independent review boards, Buchner said. NACOLE, which held its national conference last year in Salt Lake City, reached out to community leaders throughout the state to discuss options for oversight.

"We got mild interest by some," Buchner said. "Most didn’t respond or express any interest in exploring the idea of [oversight] for local law enforcement."

Adams said the Fraternal Order of Police is discussing civilian oversight measures but declined to comment further on the group’s position.

While civilian oversight mechanisms have been created in most major American cities, and are spreading to mid-sized cities and smaller towns, only Montana has a law requiring review commissions for every police agency of a certain size, Buchner said.

Wisconsin recently passed a law requiring all shootings by police to be investigated by an agency other than the one whose officer fired the shots, a policy some police watchdog groups in Utah are exploring in reaction to a spate of shootings by Utah officers — eight since the August shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., brought the national conversation on police use of force to a fever pitch.

"Civilian oversight is one way that a police department can actually be more effective," Buchner said. "When a community trusts its police department, police can be more effective. We have decades of research that show that."

ealberty@sltrib.com
 
Here's your horrifying cop news of the day - they gave this 12 year old kid 2 seconds from when they pulled up to when they shot him dead, all for carrying a fake gun:



Authorities released video this afternoon of a police officer fatally shooting 12-year-old Tamir Rice this weekend in a Cleveland park. In the video, you can see police opening fire at Rice, who was carrying an airsoft gun, within two seconds of arriving on the scene.

The shooting took place Saturday afternoon at Cudell Recreation Center. Apparently, a concerned citizen spotted Rice with the toy and called 911.

"The guy keeps pulling it out," the 911 caller said, according to WKYC. "It's probably fake, but you know what, he's scaring the (expletive) out of (inaudible). ... He's sitting on the swing right now, but he keeps pulling it in and out of his pants and pointing it at people. Probably a juvenile, you know? … I don't know if it's real or not, you know?"

Officers claim they asked Rice to put his hands up and he didn't comply. In the video above, the police car comes to a stop at 0:19, and by 0:21 the boy is already doubled over and falling to the ground, mortally wounded. Rice was rushed to the hospital, where he died Sunday morning.

Yesterday, Rice's family released a statement:

"We feel the actions of the patrol officer who took our son's life must be made public. It is our prayer and request for citizens in the City of Cleveland and throughout Northeast Ohio to remain calm at this time. We ask for the public to demonstrate peacefully."
 
Here's your horrifying cop news of the day - they gave this 12 year old kid 2 seconds from when they pulled up to when they shot him dead, all for carrying a fake gun:

On one hand, it was pretty stupid of him to be carrying a fake gun around in public in the US, as it means that you're likely to be shot.

On the other hand, he was a 12 year old boy. What 12 year old boy doesn't do something stupid once in a while?

Unfortunately, he wasn't given a chance to learn from his stupidity because trigger-happy police blew him away.
 
They could've stayed in the cop car, bullet proof windows right, and told him over the speaker phone to put down the toy gun.
 
On one hand, it was pretty stupid of him to be carrying a fake gun around in public in the US, as it means that you're likely to be shot.

Happens all the time. Open carry is legal. The kid was an idiot, but they overreacted. See below.









This guy was black, though so we had a "get on the ground":

 
i realize the law is the law but the open carry of a long gun just to try and provoke a response makes me scratch my head. should the police not respond to a call and say "sorry ma'am, it is legal so we won't check it out". kind of a difficult situation, no? it is a huge leap of faith to assume it is a harmless citizen out for a walk with an AR15 given the number of shootings that occur in America. cops obviously need to be more consistent in their approach to such citizens.

on a secondary note, anyone hear when the female citizen patriot in the last video - 7 months pregnant - lights up a smoke? you can hear her striking her lighter.
 
i realize the law is the law but the open carry of a long gun just to try and provoke a response makes me scratch my head. should the police not respond to a call and say "sorry ma'am, it is legal so we won't check it out". kind of a difficult situation, no? it is a huge leap of faith to assume it is a harmless citizen out for a walk with an AR15 given the number of shootings that occur in America. cops obviously need to be more consistent in their approach to such citizens.

on a secondary note, anyone hear when the female citizen patriot in the last video - 7 months pregnant - lights up a smoke? you can hear her striking her lighter.

That's the complexity with gun culture. You either let them run loose with guns and do nothing, or you ask the white guys for ID and shoot the blacks.
 
Last edited:
Good point. It just seems overkill to be packing a rifle. If nothing else,even though it is legal, it can do nothing but freak people out. Then they call the cops and they waste their time dealing with lawful citizens instead of shooting black folk, which seems to be their skill set.
 
All I am saying is that the populace needs to be educated that if they see someone with a rifle that it is not something to report to the police.

If it is a crime deterrent fill your boots. Good thing I don't live in an open carry place. I would have a bitch of a time matching my AR15 to my outfits.
 
Like 12 people are killed by civilians with rifles in the US per year. Get a fucking grip.

Yeah, bit of an under-count there buddy. Just at Aurora, 12 ate it with over-sized magazine boy.

People who pull that open carry shit are idiots. With the way police is now, they stand a significant risk of getting shot. Personally, I'd do whatever is necessary to avoid any interaction with the police, who as stated above, is indeed a menace to society as much as those ghetto rats are.

This said, I actually think that land battle with that donkey in Nevada was the first time I actually saw armed militia stand up to the police. I'm not really a gun lover, but it does make you think. On the contrary though, doesn't this just give police more excuses to militarize and this is just a battle to the bottom?




 
http://www.click2houston.com/news/p...rage-shooting-of-woman-on-south-loop/29960232

Pct 6: Off-duty deputy charged in road rage shooting of woman on South Loop
  • A Precinct 6 reserve deputy constable has landed on the wrong side of the law after authorities say he shot a woman during a road rage incident in southwest Houston.

    "He tried to kill me," said the woman.

    The deputy, Kenneth Caplan, was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

    "I'm worried that since he's a cop, they're going to let him off easy," said the woman.

    She was traveling on the 610 South Loop near Stella Link during the evening rush hour commute on Nov. 11.

    She said she was driving her car when she was cut off, then honked her horn and tried to get around the other driver. That action nearly cost the woman her life.

    "I honestly got a taste of death. My heart was slowing down and I couldn't really breathe," she said.

    The other driver, now identified as Caplan, drove alongside her, rolled his window down, pointed his weapon and opened fire, investigators said.

    "I just started crying because I knew I was going to die," said the victim. "I wanted to call my mom to tell her I love you."

    Caplan and his female passenger then fled the scene.

    Investigators said the female passenger leaned back in her seat while Caplan shot out the window.

    "He was aiming at me and I thought he was going to cuss me out. It didn't register that I was, you know, going to get shot," said the victim. "The blood was in between my nails, just crazy blood, and all over my cellphone, just covered."

    The bullet went through the woman's drivers side window and grazed her on the left side of the head.

    She pulled over onto the freeway shoulder and called for help.

    Emergency crews arrived and transported her to Memorial Hermann Hospital for treatment. The victim survived her injuries.

    "The doctor told me your case in one in a million. I don't ever see this," she said.

    Evidence led investigators to identify Caplan, who was in law enforcement, as the suspect.

    "I hope he gets what he deserves because I want him off the streets," said the victim.

    The Harris County Constable's Office, Precinct 6, cooperated with the investigation, which was being led by the Houston Police Department's Homicide Division.

    Caplan was arrested by HPD on Wednesday.

    Pct 6 released a statement disapproving of Caplan's actions.

    It read, "Kenneth Caplan was not on duty at the time of the incident in which he was involved nor was he displaying any article connecting him to the Harris County Constable's Office - Precinct 6. The Harris County Constable's Office - Precinct 6 neither condones nor tolerates the actions taken by Kenneth Caplan that connected him to this incident, and the necessary measures were taken to collect his credentials and remove him from our status."

    Caplan is behind bars on a $200,000 bond.
 
The cop probably used a confiscated gun, and if he had shot her in the face then he'd still be working as a cop. Wonder how long he's been a cop and what else he's gotten away with before this.
 
Stopped because of "hands in pockets"

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
 
So how did the call from the citizen who called the cops go?

"Hi. 911? Yeah, I want to report a suspicious black man. What is suspicious about him? Hello, didn't you hear me say he is BLACK. Oh, and he has his hands in his pockets. Yes, black, walking and hands in pockets. I know, what is the world coming to when black peoples are walking around like that in Pontiac of all places. I think he is fixing to do something violent or illegal if he hasn't already. Three minutes? Thanks."
 
Must watch video in link

http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20141007/bed-stuy/video-nypd-officer-hits-teen-face-with-his-gun

VIDEO: NYPD Officer Hits Unarmed Teen in the Face With His Gun

BROOKLYN — Two NYPD officers are under criminal investigation after punching and bashing a 16-year-old suspect in the face with a gun despite the teen raising his hands to surrender, according to a video obtained by DNAinfo New York.

The surveillance footage obtained exclusively by “On The Inside" shows the two officers catch up to marijuana suspect Kahreem Tribble after a brief chase in Bedford-Stuyvesant.

As the teen stops running, one officer throws a punch at his face. Then, as the suspect raises his hands, the other officer clocks him with his gun.

Tribble was arrested for possessing 17 small bags of marijuana and disorderly conduct on Aug. 29. At his arraignment, he pleaded guilty to a violation and was released with cracked teeth and bruises.

The officers from the 79th Precinct are now targets of a criminal investigation conducted by the NYPD’s Internal Affairs Bureau and Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson.

“What’s depicted on this video is troubling and warrants a thorough investigation,” Thompson told “On The Inside."

According to court records, law enforcement sources and the video, the encounter started in front of 1311 St. John’s Place at 2:20 a.m. when three anti-crime officers spotted the 6-foot-2 teen peering into the window of parked mini-van.

When the officers got out of their car to approach Tribble, he allegedly tossed away a small black canvas bag and took off running. The officers — one with his gun drawn — gave chase, concerned that the suspect had a weapon, sources said.

Shortly thereafter, Tribble slows down and stops and appears prepared to be arrested. But an officer, identified as Tyrane Isaac, rushes up to him and takes a swing at his head.

The teen ducks the blow and then can be seen retreating — with his hands up — to a storefront gate.

Officer David Afanador — his gun drawn — then catches up and rushes straight to Tribble, hitting him in the his face with his gun, breaking a front tooth and chipping another.




Two officers can be seen on video beating teen Kahreem Tribble in Bedford-Stuyvesant on Aug. 29, 2014.
View Full Caption
DNAinfo
On the video, Afanador then holsters his weapon and retraces his steps to retrieve the canvas bag, leaving Isaacs to put the cuffs on Tribble.

But before he does, Isaac punches Tribble again and pushes him onto his stomach.

The video ends with Afanador waving the bag in front of Tribble’s face before smacking him with it.

A third officer, identified as Christopher Mastoros, can be seen taking no action to help Tribble.

Police Commissioner William Bratton has seen the video and was angered and embarrassed by it, a source said.

Sources say officials were particularly concerned about Afanador using his gun on the teen because it could have accidentally fired — injuring or killing him, another officer or an innocent bystander.

Afanador has been suspended without pay. Isaac was placed on modified duty, stripped of his badge and gun.

Both officers have been on the force for nine years and now face possible criminal charges and dismissal, sources say.

Mastoros, also a nine-year veteran, could face a departmental charge for failing to stop his colleagues, sources say. He is not part of the criminal probe.

Each of the officers has two other cases lodged against them by defendants alleging false arrest or being victims of excessive force, according to court records. The cases were not connected.

Mastoros made news two years ago when he was credited with helping save the life of a partner, Kevin Brennan, who survived being shot in the head after chasing a gunman into a Bushwick building.

The video is the latest to surface since the viral video of the tragic “choke hold” death of Eric Garner. Last week, Bratton told a confab of top NYPD officials that he was committed to rooting out bad apples engaged in brutality and corruption.

Sources say Internal Affairs was tipped off to the Tribble video a few days after his arrest. Roughly two weeks ago, IAB supervisors brought their findings to Thompson to determine if criminal charges are warranted.

Patrick Lynch, the police union president, said the tape does not tell the entire tale.

“As usual, the video fails to capture the offense that resulted in police action or the lengthy foot pursuit that culminated in the arrest," he said.

"Situations like this one happen in real time under great stress. It’s very easy to be judgmental in the comfort of an office while sitting in front of a video screen."

Tribble’s lawyer, Amy Rameau, told "On The Inside" that her client was heading home from a friend's apartment when the officers chased him.

"My client was minding his own business and they decided to chase him for no reason," she said. "Their account is concocted to justify what they did, to cover their asses, to legitimize their criminal conduct."

She said in addition to suffering broken teeth, Tribble was bleeding from his mouth and "begging for medical attention," but was only sent to Interfaith Hospital when other officers at Central Booking saw him.

She said she plans to file a federal civil rights lawsuit against the NYPD and the officers.

The clash has left the teen "petrified" of police and "traumatized and fearful that they will come after him again."
This was the Gallant victim to Goofus Michael Brown. Sadly, this case (which was utterly indisputable with video evidence) fell to the same fate as the Wilson case (which had obfuscating liars telling some hands-up story) and the officer was not indicted. Unlike the Ferguson case, no explanation at all was provided.
This is the case to get behind, not that violent sociopath Brown.
 
Cop Kills Unarmed Black Man in Arizona

ldybjozdu3o0mdeno40r.png
Expand12

Rumain Brisbon, an unarmed black father of four, was shot to death in Arizona Tuesday when a police officer apparently mistook his bottle of pills for a gun.

About 100 protestors marched to police headquarters in Phoenix Thursday, demanding the department release the name of the officer who shot Brisbon. A spokesperson reportedly defended the shooting, saying, "This one went bad from the standpoint of how it ended, but the officer was doing exactly what we want him to do."

Parts of the official police story have been challenged by some witnesses, the Arizona Republic reports.

According to police, a citizen reported a drug deal in a black SUV around 6 p.m. The officers went to investigate the car, where they saw Brisbon taking something out of the trunk. When they told him to put his hands up, cops say, he put his hands in his waistband, prompting one officer, a 30-year-old with seven years on the force, to pull out his gun. Then, the cops say, Brisbon tried to flee and the officer chased him down.

"During the struggle, Brisbon put his left hand in his pocket and the officer grabbed onto the suspect's hand, while repeatedly telling the suspect to keep his hand in his pocket," [police spokesperson Sgt. Trent Crump] said. "The officer believed he felt the handle of a gun while holding the suspect's hand in his pocket."

A woman inside an apartment opened a door at that moment, and the officer and Brisbon tumbled inside, Crump said. Two children, ages 9 and 2, were in a back bedroom, he said.

The officer could no longer keep a grip on Brisbon's hand and, because he feared that the suspect had a gun in his pocket, fired two shots, Crump said.

"It was so loud, I heard the vibration through the floor," Martin Rangel, who lives above the apartment where the shooting occurred, told the Arizona Republic. "I ran to the window, and that's when I saw the cop running out, or like, walking out, and he was cussing, you know, he was screaming, 'F—k, f—k,' like upset that he shot the guy."

Another witness, Brandon Dickerson, told the Arizona Republic he didn't see the officer try to talk to Brisbon before the confrontation began. An attorney for the family said "numerous witnesses" would refute parts of the official story.

Although police say they later recovered marijuana and a handgun from the SUV, the only thing Brisbon had on his person was a bottle of oxycodone pills.

He died on the scene.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/04/cleveland-police-doj_n_6270220.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

WASHINGTON -- In recent years, Cleveland police officers have punched a 13-year-old boy who was in handcuffs for shoplifting and shot at an unarmed kidnapping victim who was wearing only his underwear, according to disturbing allegations released Thursday by the Justice Department. The agency's investigation found that officers in Cleveland routinely use unjustifiable force against not only criminals and suspects, but also innocent victims of crimes.

The so-called “pattern or practice” report from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division was released Thursday afternoon as DOJ and the city announced plans to develop a court-enforceable agreement that would impose an independent monitor on the Cleveland Division of Police.

"Accountability and legitimacy are essential for communities to trust their police departments, and for there to be genuine collaboration between police and the citizens they serve,” said Attorney General Eric Holder in a press conference on Thursday.

Holder announced the measure during his trip to Cleveland, where police officers fatally shot an unarmed black child last month. In Cleveland, Holder has attended a series of meetings about rebuilding community trust between law enforcement and the public, even as protests erupted nationwide over the non-indictment of police officers who killed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and Eric Garner in New York City. Following his visit to Cleveland, Holder intends to visit Chicago and Philadelphia, as well as Memphis, Tennessee, and Oakland, California, for additional roundtable meetings.

In his remarks Thursday, Holder said that he and President Barack Obama believe there is more to be done on the issue of use of lethal force by police departments.

The Justice Department began investigating the use of force in Cleveland's police division in March 2013. A few months prior, Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson had requested that the agency look into the issue. Jackson's request came after a high-profile police chase in November 2012 that resulted in Cleveland police dispatching at least 62 vehicles, firing 137 bullets and killing two unarmed black suspects, who each sustained more than 20 gunshot wounds.

There have been numerous other occasions when Cleveland police are alleged to have used excessive force. Most recently, on Nov. 22, a Cleveland police officer fatally shot 12-year-old Tamir Rice, who was playing with a toy gun in a park. Footage of the incident shows the officer firing his gun within two seconds of pulling up to the boy in his car. The Guardian reported on Thursday that Timothy Loehmann, the officer who shot Tamir, was judged unfit for police work in 2012 by his then-employer, the police department of Independence, Ohio. An Independence official described Loehmann's "dismal" handgun performance in an internal memo.

According to the DOJ report, Cleveland police officers "carelessly fire their weapons, placing themselves, subjects, and bystanders at unwarranted risk of serious injury or death." For example, the agency pointed to an incident in 2011 where officers "fired 24 rounds in a residential neighborhoods," with six rounds striking houses and 14 hitting parked cars. In another case, "an officer’s decision to draw his gun while trying to apprehend an unarmed hit-and-run suspect resulted in him accidentally shooting the man in the neck."

The Justice Department also claimed to have identified "several cases" where "officers shot or shot at people who did not pose an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury to officers or others." For example, in 2013, the report noted that police shot at a kidnapping victim after he fled from his assailants wearing only his boxers. The sergeant said he believed the victim had a weapon because he raised his hand.


In another case detailed by the Justice Department, a 300-pound officer punched a 13-year-old boy who was handcuffed inside a police car and kicking the door. The officer, whom the report describes as 8 inches taller than the boy, punched him "three to four times" until he was "'stunned/dazed' and had a bloody nose."

The agency noted that "supervisors’ analyses of use of force incidents is superficial at best and, at its worst, appears to be designed to justify their subordinates’ unreasonable use of force." For example, in the case of the teenage boy, the agency said the officer's supervisor "failed to even consider that the punches might have been retaliatory (perhaps because the officer was angry) and unnecessary to secure the boy."


The DOJ report stated that "each and every time we saw officers write that they had tased a handcuffed suspect, the use of force was approved up the chain of command." In one case, an officer wrote that he gave a man an electrical shock to prevent him from falling after he fled in handcuffs -- even though, as the report noted, "suspects normally fall after being tased." It went on to say that "justifying the use of a Taser to stop a [fleeing], handcuffed person from falling is simply not credible."

The report cited another case in which officers shocked a handcuffed suspect, prompting him to "fall face-first onto asphalt, shattering four front teeth and causing facial contusions."


A Cleveland police officer also administered an electric shock to a man who was deaf and suicidal, according to the DOJ report. The man had committed no crime and may not have understood instructions.


The report also said that the culture of the Cleveland police force promotes an "us-against-them" mentality. It cited the example of a sign in one district station that identifies the station as a "forward operating base" -- which DOJ noted is a military term for a small outpost in a war zone.


The report concluded that the police department’s "method of policing contributes to the community's distrust of and lack of respect for officers.”


The report also noted that while it did not make a finding regarding racial profiling, "many African-Americans reported that they believe [Cleveland police] officers are verbally and physically aggressive toward them because of their race."

Ironically, last week, a number of white and Hispanic officers who were disciplined for the Nov. 2012 shooting filed a lawsuit, alleging that they were punished especially harshly because the shooting victims were black and they, the officers, were not.

Read the full DOJ report here.

CORRECTION: This article has been edited to make clear that an incident cited by the report in which a handcuffed suspect broke four teeth after being shocked is not the same incident in which police used a Taser to shock a fleeing, handcuffed man.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/04/justi...mothy-loehmann/index.html?c=homepage-t&page=0

Cop who shot 12-year-old slammed in past job


(CNN) - Nearly two years before he shot and killed a 12-year-old who had an air gun, Cleveland Police Officer Timothy Loehmann resigned from another police job after a supervisor described him as "distracted and weepy" and "emotionally immature."

Records from the Independence Police Department obtained by CNN include comments from a supervisor detailing what they called "a pattern of lack of maturity, indiscretion and not following instructions," a "dangerous loss of composure during live range training" and an "inability to manage personal stress."

"I do not believe time, nor training, will be able to change or correct these deficiencies," Independence Deputy Chief Jim Polak wrote in a November 2012 memo.

Now Loehmann, who could not be immediately reached for comment, is one of two Cleveland police officers under investigation after the fatal shooting of 12-year-old Tamir Rice last month. Police have said the boy was shot after pulling out an air gun that looked like a real firearm.

Loehmann joined the Cleveland Police Department in March. A Cleveland Police spokesman said Thursday that during a background check before hiring Loehmann, his department didn't review the officer's personnel file from Independence, a suburb south of the city. Detectives did speak with the Independence human resources director, the spokesman said.

"During that interview detectives inquired if there were any disciplinary actions or incidents that Cleveland Police should be aware of prior to hiring Loehmann, at which point they were told there were none," Sgt. Ali Pillow said. "The reason for departure indicated was resignation. Officer Loehmann indicated that he resigned for personal reasons, which was substantiated by the City of Independence."

According to the records, Loehmann worked at the Independence Police Department as an officer until December 2012, when he submitted his resignation "for personal reasons" after he was told that a disciplinary process of separation had begun.

"Ptl. Loehmann's inability to perform basic functions as instructed, and his inability to emotionally function because of a personal situation at home with an on and off again girlfriend leads one to believe that he would not be able to substantially cope, or make good decisions, during or resulting from any other stressful situation," Polok wrote.

Another memo from a sergeant who worked with Loehmann at a shooting range described the officer as "distracted," "not fit to return" after an emotional outburst and someone who was "not following simple instructions."

An Independence spokeswoman said in a statement that the city had made all personnel files for Loehmann available.

Loehmann has been on paid injured leave since November 22 after injuring his ankle in the shooting, Pillow said. His partner is also on paid administrative leave

The shooting has sparked criticism from community members who accuse police of unnecessary violence.

Police said it's not clear if the responding officers involved in the shooting received information about the age of the suspect or the gun being "probably fake."

Fred Loehmann, Timothy Loehmann's father, told the Cleveland Plain Dealer this week that his son didn't know the boy's gun was fake or realize he was 12 years old.

"I was right there and he went for the gun," he recalled his son saying, according to the newspaper. "I had no choice."

Efforts by CNN to reach Loehmann Thursday were not immediately successful.
 
Peter Liang, the rookie Brooklyn cop who shot and killed unarmed black man Akai Gurley two weeks ago, was texting his union rep instead of calling for help as Gurley lay dying, the New York Daily News reports.

Gurley was walking in a dark stairway of East New York's Pink Houses public housing complex with his girlfriend Melissa Butler (above center) at the time of his death. Police sources told the Daily News officials attempted to reach Liang and his partner for over six minutes after the killing to no avail:

Right after rookie cop Peter Liang discharged a single bullet that struck Gurley, 28, he and his partner Shaun Landau were incommunicado for more than six and a half minutes, sources said Thursday.

In the critical moments after the Nov. 20 shooting, the cops' commanding officer and an emergency operator — responding to a 911 call from a neighbor and knowing the duo was in the area — tried to reach them in vain, sources said.

"That's showing negligence," said a law enforcement source of the pair's decision to text their union rep before making a radio call for help.

Authorities reportedly only learned of the shooting after a neighbor called 911.

Gurley was reportedly killed by a single bullet, after Liang drew his gun upon entering the stairwell. After the incident, NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton told reporters Liang "had no intention of striking anyone" and may have accidentally discharged his gun, and that Gurley was a "total innocent" who "did not engage in any other activity other than trying to walk down the stairwell."

According to the Daily News, Liang and his partner weren't supposed to be doing stairway patrols—known as "verticals"—that day:

"They've done verticals before," a police source said of the two officers.

"But [Deputy Inspector Miguel Iglesias]' philosophy was, 'I want a presence on the street, in the courtyards — and if they go into the buildings they were just supposed to check out the lobby."

Another source said the commander was furious after the shooting, raging, "I told them not to do verticals."

Sources also told the News that Liang's text messages indicated he did not know the exact address of the building. Brooklyn District Attorney Ken Thompson is investigating and may present evidence to a grand jury.
 
www.ianwelsh.net/in-light-of-eric-garner

In Light of Eric Garner
Understand this, if you understand nothing else:

the system is working as intended.

It is true that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a sandwich, and it is tempting to blame the prosecutor, Donovan. Certainly he made a decision, but he made the decision that the system wants: police are almost never prosecuted for assault or murder and on those rare occasions that they are, they almost always get off.

Donovan did what the legal system wanted him to do.

As for the police in question, well, they did what the legal system wants them to do, as well:

“Get away [garbled] … for what? Every time you see me, you want to mess with me. I’m tired of it. It stops today. Why would you…? Everyone standing here will tell you I didn’t do nothing. I did not sell nothing. Because every time you see me, you want to harass me. You want to stop me (garbled) Selling cigarettes. I’m minding my business, officer, I’m minding my business. Please just leave me alone. I told you the last time, please just leave me alone. please please, don’t touch me. Do not touch me.”

” I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe,” he said, as officers restrained him.

What you will hear defenders of the police say is “he was non-compliant.”

Non-compliant.

If a police officer tells you to do anything, you do it immediately. If you do not, anything that happens to you, up to and including death, is your problem.

The legal system exists, today, to ensure compliance.


From Wikipedia

American oligarchical society rests on people not effectively resisting. All gains now go to the top 10%, with the rest of society losing ground. Incarceration rates blossom in 1980, which is also the year that the oligarchical program is voted in and becomes official. (Trickle down economics can be understood no other way.)

Any part of the population which is inclined to resist, must be taught that it cannot resist. Get out millions to demonstrate against the Iraq war: it will not work. Protest against police killings of African Americans, it will not work.

Nothing you do will work.

You will comply, and you will learn that resistance is futile.

The more outside the mainstream you are, the more you will learn it. African Americans, Latinos, poor whites (in that order.) Those who are fundamentally authoritarian, but somewhat opposed to the system (like the Bundy ranch) are treated more carefully (though the militia movement has its martyrs). But the fundamental lesson of life is to do what your lords and masters tell you to, and to not protest any law or order, no matter how nonsensical, trivial, or unjust it is.

Three strikes laws and the end of judicial discretion are about this. During the 80s the legal system was taken away from the judges and given to the prosecutors and the police. Almost all sentences are plea-bargained: the person with almost all the power in the system is the prosecutor. He or she is judge and jury for the vast majority of cases, and even when a case does go in front of a judge, the judge’s discretion is extremely limited. Your third crime stealing a bike? Too bad, we’re throwing the key away.

Compliance when given specific orders and learned hopelessness about protest or organizing are the aims. Ordinary citizens must understand that they cannot change the system if elites do not agree with the changes they want made. If they try, they will be arrested and receive a criminal sentence, meaning they can never again have a good job.

In this system the wolves or goats identify themselves. An injustice is committed, people protest and the most aggressive protestors (which doesn’t always mean violence) are arrested. Certainly the organizers are. Those people are, as a result, usually destroyed economically even if they aren’t locked up for years.

The system is doing what it is meant to do. It teaches compliance, it teaches hopelessness and it identifies those who will not obey laws that don’t make sense (marijuana possession, for example), or who will fight or organize against the system and then it destroys them economically and often psychologically through practices like solitary confinement and prison rape.

The system will not change until those who want it to change have the raw power to force it to change, because it does serve the interests of its masters by destroying or marginalizing anyone who is actually a danger to oligarchical control of the system.

Race is an effective tool in this system, dividing the lower classes (and almost everyone is lower class now) against each other. No matter how bad a poor white’s life is, well hey, he ain’t black. He or she can feel superior to someone, can have someone to kick down at.

And understand this, most of what police are paid in is social coin: the right to demand immediate obedience and fuck people up; the solidarity of the blue line; the feeling of belonging and power, is what makes the job worth having for (probably most) of the people who are now attracted to it.

Being a thug; having social sanction to be a thug, is enjoyable to a lot of people. Since that’s what cops get to do, those are the sort of people who tend to be attracted to the job. The police are the biggest toughest gang around, and belonging to them has most of the rewards of gang life, without the dangers of going to jail.

Working as intended
 
The system will not change until those who want it to change have the raw power to force it to change, because it does serve the interests of its masters by destroying or marginalizing anyone who is actually a danger to oligarchical control of the system.

A fair amount of apologist bullshit, could have all been summed up in that one phrase.

This entire tyranny thread... how many videos of a wealthy person have you seen posted here? 0.
 
Cops don't target rich people but rather serve them. That's who gets protected and served.

Hey, I thought I was the only classist here.

I've posted this many times, but it deserves another. Greatest piece of social commentary ever.


 
http://m.thestar.com/

Toronto police want board chair to quit over Facebook post

The Toronto Police Association is demanding that Alok Mukherjee, chair of the civilian oversight board, resign after he shared a meme on his Facebook page that the union said compares officers to terrorists.

On Thursday, Mukherjee shared the meme created by activist group Occupy Wall Street that reads: Americans killed by ISIS: 3, Americans killed by Ebola: 2, Americans killed by the police: 500 every year.

The association says the meme “not only compares police officers to terrorists but implies they are in fact far more dangerous.”


“His sharing of this poster is clearly unprofessional, clearly unethical and clearly seeks to undermine the very people he is paid to oversee,” says an association bulletin distributed to police stations throughout the city.

“(Alok) Mukherjee has crossed the line. His lack of objectivity indicates he is no longer fit to sit on a police oversight body.”

The post was not visible on Mukherjee’s Facebook page Friday.

A screen capture of the page also included the now ubiquitous “I can’t breathe” — the words used by an unarmed black man in New York City while an NYPD officer held him in a choke-hold.

The man, Eric Garner, died, and his words have been used as part of a chant by crowds protesting a grand jury’s decision not to indict the officer.

“I very much regret the reaction caused by the posting,” Mukherjee said in statement sent by email Friday afternoon.

“The item was shared as a topic of interest, intended to encourage conversation and reflection. The share was not intended to be a negative commentary in any way on members of our police service or on our practices.”

Mukherjee added he is “proud of our approach to policing,” and has the “utmost respect for members of the Toronto Police Service.”

There has been an escalating war of words between the police service and the Toronto Police Services Board, with contract negotiations set to begin soon. The contract expires Dec. 31.

“The chair should not resign,” Councillor Michael Thompson said Friday, pointing out that the post made no reference to Toronto policing. “It would be to the police association’s advantage if the chair were to resign, and that’s really what this is all about.”

Thompson, who up until this week was vice-chair of the board, said the police union is “afraid” of the “tough” upcoming contract talks that Mukherjee has put in place.

The association planned to file a letter of complaint to Premier Kathleen Wynne, Mayor John Tory and the police board and the Ontario Civilian Police Commission.

Tory, who is taking a seat on the board, said the post could “lead to the inference” that it relates to the Toronto Police Service.

“I think that’s why there’s judgment involved here that isn’t good,” he said. “And I can just say for my own part — and we’ll see what he has to say — our police service is not perfect, nobody’s is, but we have one of the best in the world, and I think we want to make sure that we enforce that.”

Tory did not respond when asked if he agreed Mukherjee should resign.

Mukherjee is a provincial appointee until 2016. His position as chair is subject to an annual vote.

City council holds a majority of the seven seats on the board. Tory has decided to take a seat on the board joined by Councillors Shelley Carroll and Chin Lee. They replace outgoing members Thompson and Frances Nunziata.

 
Holy shit, this one is completely nuts. Has anyone heard about this?

http://www.inquisitr.com/1593251/samantha-ramsey-police-shooting/

Samantha Ramsey Police Shooting: No Charges For Deputy Who Killed 19-Year-Old Preschool Teacher
Samantha-Ramsey-police-shooting-no-charges-665x385.jpg

Samantha Ramsey, a 19-year-old recent high-school grad, was trying to drive away from a party in late April when she ran over the foot of Boone County, Kentucky Sheriff’s Deputy Tyler Brockman. Within seconds, Brockman jumped on to the hood of her car and blasted four rounds from his service weapon into the car, striking Ramsey at point blank range.

The teen was killed by the barrage of gunfire, though three other passengers in the car, as well as Brockman, escaped as the vehicle crashed into a ditch.

On Thursday, a Kentucky grand jury decided that because Brockman feared for his life, the police shooting was justified and that the deputy will not face charges for gunning down Samantha Ramsey, who taught preschool at Children’s Inc., a child-care center in her hometown of Covington.

Brockman was called to the scene of the outdoor party to investigate reports of underage drinking there. Toxicology reports showed that Ramsey had a blood-alcohol level of 0.12 when she was shot to death.

Brockman attempted to stop Samantha Ramsey as she left the party in her vehicle, but instead she made a left turn and ran over his foot, causing injuries later diagnosed as bruises.

In his account of the police shooting after the incident in the early morning hours of April 26, Brockman — who oddly referred to himself in the third person throughout the statement — said that he jumped onto the hood of Ramsey’s slow-moving vehicle because he believed she was about to kill him by running him down with the car.

“The shots were fired not only to save his life but also the pedestrians walking on the road and the officers currently just down the road initiating other arrests,” Brockman said in his description of the tragic events.

“Deputy Brockman then heard the RPMs of the car begin to rise, felt the wind picking up on his back, and noticed the car was picking up speed. At this point Deputy Brockman knew the operator, Samantha Ramsey, was about to kill him. Deputy Brockman, in reaction to the deadly force brought against him, drew his Glock 22 Service weapon and fired what he believed to be 3 shots (turned out to be 4) through the driver window.”

But according to Bobby Turner, who was in the backseat of the ill-fated vehicle, Ramsey and the other partygoers in the car simply did not notice Brockman as he approached their vehicle.

“We didn’t know the police was talking to us,” Turner recalled. “I just saw him jump on the hood and start shooting.”

A witness who saw the events unfold from across the street, Josh Pitts, said that he couldn’t tell why the deputy jumped on Ramsey’s car.

“As she was trying to make a turn and leave the party, he jumped on the car and pulled his gun out and shot four times through the window and hit the girl,” Pitts recounted.

“While Tyler and his family remain extremely thankful he is alive, his survival came with the heavy burden of doing what he had to do to protect himself and others. He sincerely regrets the loss the Ramsey family has suffered,” said a statement issued by Brockman’s lawyers after a grand jury declined to bring any charges against him.

A lab report also showed that Samantha Ramsey had marijuana in her system and, according to a forensic expert, that might have impaired her judgment as she drove off, leading to the tragedy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom