- Messages
- 14,213
I’m pretty sure all these ‘influencers’ are aspiring to make a living out of their bullshit and many would have registered companies they can use to write off expenses going to a Pitti trade show.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember him now, they accused his wife of being a lady boy or the equivalent.
i miss friend customer and conchita.Remember him now, they accused his wife of being a lady boy or the equivalent.

Well shit, none of us want to look too far back into the WAYWN thread. But it’s all just part of growing old together.Geez, I'm looking back through the thread at my cringe-inducing posts. Sorry to put you folks through that...![]()
Looks like Max Bernier.
waiting for the day that we can look back on that studded belt...Well shit, none of us want to look too far back into the WAYWN thread. But it’s all just part of growing old together.
waiting for the day that we can look back on that studded belt...
It’s an improvement on his usual sexless, gormless efforts. I still hate the granny’s shopping bag and the JMM overpriced disco glasses.
instagram.com
You know I would.That's actually pretty pimptastic, in a 1970s way.
fxh would be a fan of those Cuban-heeled boots, too.
You know I would.
Been looking at Ron Howard’s Beatles doco “8Days A Week” I think it is. For some nostalgia/research + Ms. Fxh was at the melbourne concert. And there’s footage of it as Channel 9 at the time filmed one concert. Howard uses some of the footage.
And was I thinking how good, cool, and almost {{ I hate myself for this word}} timeless cuban heels look. Although I noticed some of the beatle boots had pointed toes, a seam down middle of boot vamp and were zip up and well over the ankle. Looked great with those skinny, but not tight, straight trousers on those cute mop top kids.
That's a twisted look if ever there was one. Last time I saw a leather coat that long was on Otto Flick.
Cuban heels no good on the taller gent. I did notice that John Lennon had some cool looking striped shirts in the documentary.You know I would.
Been looking at Ron Howard’s Beatles doco “8Days A Week” I think it is. For some nostalgia/research + Ms. Fxh was at the melbourne concert. And there’s footage of it as Channel 9 at the time filmed one concert. Howard uses some of the footage.
And was I thinking how good, cool, and almost {{ I hate myself for this word}} timeless cuban heels look. Although I noticed some of the beatle boots had pointed toes, a seam down middle of boot vamp and were zip up and well over the ankle. Looked great with those skinny, but not tight, straight trousers on those cute mop top kids.
Cubans are best on tall, slim guys. Short guys look like they are compensating and fatties just look weird. Woodsman heels are a little more forgiving for the heigh and weight challenged.Cuban heels no good on the taller gent. I did notice that John Lennon had some cool looking striped shirts in the documentary.
NGL those are great photographs, even if it’s not my style.
If there's one thing Crompters never intended to be called, is edgy.![]()
OMG. How edgy! A vintage black leather jacket over his chinos and sweater.
That's a twisted look if ever there was one. Last time I saw a leather coat that long was on Otto Flick.
Cuban heels no good on the taller gent. I did notice that John Lennon had some cool looking striped shirts in the documentary.
Our foremost intellectuals
I dunno, I mean I'm not anti. It doesn't look bad or anything but I wouldn't say he is dressed well either. Struggling for content to write about maybe?![]()
OMG. How edgy! A vintage black leather jacket over his chinos and sweater.
Our foremost intellectuals
Hipsters, flipsters and finger poppin' daddies...the Manchester bard hasn't changes his look in 45 years.
You just know that attempt at nonchalantly flashing his hairy chest, is extremely posed and fake.
Our foremost intellectuals
Our foremost intellectuals
I think the suffix 'by the age of four' is what makes the statement rather icky. Not that I care for Peterson and his ilk or what he peddles -a big portion of which is just 'basic' but is lorded as if he has discovered the fifth ,sixth and laws of thermodynamics when it is just rehashed self-help stuff.What does that even mean
It’s icky and, looking at his son there, maybe he would have done better to raise him to find self worth and esteem inside himself and not on his marketability as a playmate. Because you know that kid is dying an incel!I think the suffix 'by the age of four' is what makes the statement rather icky. Not that I care for Peterson and his ilk or what he peddles -a big portion of which is just 'basic' but is lorded as if he has discovered the fifth ,sixth and laws of thermodynamics when it is just rehashed self-help stuff.
He does make a salient, if basic, point: parents preparing their children for the travails of the real world in all its facets which I suppose includes mate selection. There are frankly a lot of big babies from age 40 and downwards out there.
It’s icky and, looking at his son there, maybe he would have done better to raise him to find self worth and esteem inside himself and not on his marketability as a playmate. Because you know that kid is dying an incel!
TCW is another cunt not peterson’s son.Is his son, the chap he is with in the photo above? I confess I don't know much about his familial life. I also am puzzled as to why Jordan Peterson is so popular.
He’s a horrible dresserWtf you posting the Peterson goofball for.
It’s actually a „proven, scientific fact“ (TM) (at least for those considering psychology a science) that if you aren’t socialized enough to play with other kids by the age of four, or more specifically, get invited by others to play, this will not happen anymore at all. I‘m sure our resident psychologistI think the suffix 'by the age of four' is what makes the statement rather icky.
Yeah feel free to keep me out of the loop on this one, Stable Genius (tm)It’s actually a „proven, scientific fact“ (TM) (at least for those considering psychology a science) that if you aren’t socialized enough to play with other kids by the age of four, or more specifically, get invited by others to play, this will not happen anymore at all. I‘m sure our resident psychologistSartodi Napoli or
belinmad can give us more information.