Grand Potentate
Any way to make sign-on persistent in iOS Safari private browsing mode? Forum software always signs me out when I've "alt-tabbed" and sometimes even just switch between browser tabs...
In private browsing? No, unfortunately. The whole point of private browsing is to prevent cookie storage and tracking and those are the tools by which the forum keeps your status as logged in.
It was something requested by membership. There's no way to turn it off just for one person.
interesting. of course its not possible to switch it off for one.
same as liking a post.
nvm
hmm. why do you think so? the size of the box or it doesn't function properly?
using the little edit pencil or the buttons like quote and italics?
interesting. they work ok for me but it places the cursor outside the code, which is annoying. i'll look into that.
i know, but other people do, so we might as well get it out there a bit.
Exactly what it's good for
Thruth
. I'm sure that
LKP
and FriendCustomer will be up next. Maybe some of our other German brethren as well.
Exactly what it's good for
We had a glut of donations thanks to John Lee Pettimore III and
You've got a real 'shoot for the Stars' attitude. I like that.
Exactly what it's good for
We had a glut of donations thanks to John Lee Pettimore III and
Meistermeister
did not like this post?
Grand Potentate
can you please change this?
Sry I'm broke and after I told my wife about
LKP
and his scat fetish, she won't give me any money for the forvm...
Oh it was excellent. The two of us shared one cup. mhhhhhhh
I took out the chat list to give more space to type, since I made the box so short vertically. With the list you'd either have to scroll right or have even less lines of text showing. Your call if you think it should be in there.
Thruth
,
fxh
, John Lee Pettimore III, Rain Man, Journeyman,
LKP
, ConchitaWurst, FriendCustomer, MFDoom, COG,
doghouse
, Pauly Chase.
In the long absence since the Sportsbook has been up, its intrepid developer has been hard at work adding in features. I bring this up because he might have stumbled upon one that you guys will finally like:
Betting Exchange for Member vs Member Bets
As per title, the ability for Member A to create a "bet" with Member B. This is a ONE on ONE bet.
Member A creates a Bet, sets the stake amount (which is immediately deducted from Member A's on hand cash) and choose the member they want to place the bet against.
Member B can then either accept the bet (which the stake amount is immediately deducted from Member B's on hand cash) and the bet is LOCKED (preventing Member A from changing the bet criteria) OR Member B can reject the bet in which time Member A will either have his stake returned and the bet will be closed OR the bet will open to the public which in case anyone can accept the bet (only 1 person tho).
Bets will consist of a TITLE that gives members an idea of what the bet might be about (eg Raiders vs Broncos), a DESCRIPTION that sets the parameters of the bet (The Raiders will beat the Broncos by 14 pts), Stake amount, which is the amount that BOTH players wager (winner takes all), setting some Dates that control various aspects of the wager and whether its private or public.
Once the event is over, it takes BOTH Member A and Member B to settle the event. The payout options are Push (returns the stakes), Pay Member A or Pay Member B. If the event is not settled by both members after x amount of time (admin configurable), then a Bookie that has permission to Settle Member Bets will be able to handle it.
The Bet Criteria will NOT be editable by ANYONE (that includes Admins, Moderators and Bookies), so there is no way (besides editing the DB) to change the criteria.. ie, if Sheldon bet me that the Lions would beat the Raiders by 33 points, then one of his buddy Mods couldn't change it to 21 points and then settle the wager in Sheldon's favor.
I figured this could be used for anything....This sound appealing to anyone?
I'll bet on that!
In the long absence since the Sportsbook has been up, its intrepid developer has been hard at work adding in features. I bring this up because he might have stumbled upon one that you guys will finally like:
Betting Exchange for Member vs Member Bets
As per title, the ability for Member A to create a "bet" with Member B. This is a ONE on ONE bet.
Member A creates a Bet, sets the stake amount (which is immediately deducted from Member A's on hand cash) and choose the member they want to place the bet against.
Member B can then either accept the bet (which the stake amount is immediately deducted from Member B's on hand cash) and the bet is LOCKED (preventing Member A from changing the bet criteria) OR Member B can reject the bet in which time Member A will either have his stake returned and the bet will be closed OR the bet will open to the public which in case anyone can accept the bet (only 1 person tho).
Bets will consist of a TITLE that gives members an idea of what the bet might be about (eg Raiders vs Broncos), a DESCRIPTION that sets the parameters of the bet (The Raiders will beat the Broncos by 14 pts), Stake amount, which is the amount that BOTH players wager (winner takes all), setting some Dates that control various aspects of the wager and whether its private or public.
Once the event is over, it takes BOTH Member A and Member B to settle the event. The payout options are Push (returns the stakes), Pay Member A or Pay Member B. If the event is not settled by both members after x amount of time (admin configurable), then a Bookie that has permission to Settle Member Bets will be able to handle it.
The Bet Criteria will NOT be editable by ANYONE (that includes Admins, Moderators and Bookies), so there is no way (besides editing the DB) to change the criteria.. ie, if Sheldon bet me that the Lions would beat the Raiders by 33 points, then one of his buddy Mods couldn't change it to 21 points and then settle the wager in Sheldon's favor.
I figured this could be used for anything....This sound appealing to anyone?
