Its The Economy, Stupid - Economic & Business News From Around The World


"Amid concerns about physical safety, companies across the industry have beefed up security for their executives and removed their photos and much of their personal information from their websites. That includes UnitedHealth Group, which appears to no longer have an executive leadership page."

Whew.. no need to get a new headshot.
 

“Some 14% of 5,000 global corporate leaders polled by PwC said they expect Britain to receive more international investment this year than every country except the United States. That’s the highest ranking the UK has held in 28 years.”

If you can’t bring yourself to invest in the States or EU, take a look at Great Britain. Third best place to stash your money.
 

"Russia’s only remaining sources of funding are its national wealth fund and revenues from oil and gas exports. The fund has been forced to liquidate holdings to pay for current needs. It held about $300 billion in foreign reserves before the war, which are now frozen. Its prewar domestic holdings, also about $300 billion, have been drawn down by two-thirds. At current rates the liquid reserves will be depleted sometime in 2025.

China has done what it can to help, increasing exports to the Russian market of electric vehicles and other manufactured consumer goods. But Chinese banks have been subjected to sanctions for facilitating Russian acquisition of military goods. China’s economy is also slumping. Further sanctions could put Beijing’s appetite for conflict with the West to the test."

Uh oh...BRICS BIS to the rescue!
 

"Like Honeywell, other U.S. conglomerates have been pressured by shareholders to simplify their structures, allowing each segment of the company to move more freely and adapt to changes in their respective markets."

Time to also dump some balance sheet stuff on the underperforming spinoff.
 
State Farm Was All In on California—Until It Pulled the Plug Before the Fires

Rambo will go stark mad.

But after reading this I realise California has a personal home insurance market that has rates regulated by the state. State Farm then carved off its California operations into a separate entity to insulate the parent company. This was because the rate increases approved by the state for the homeowners was substantially lower than the rate increases calculated by the insurance companies' own actuaries. The subsidiary runs at a 126% loss ratio and is basically in debt. In the final year before the 2025 wildfire, State Farm pushes the state to approve higher rate increases and is denied so they start withdrawing from areas of high exposure (reads like ZIP code risk modeling).

There is a whole tangent in the article about insurance sales agents making commissions off State Farm's (lower rated) policies because other insurers pulled out of the market and one of these agents became the CEO and retired, but that's beside the point. They couldn't offer properly priced policies anyway.

Regulated rate markets don't work in an insurance market unless it's a single entity provider - i.e. a government agency. Then as the public insurer you are just doing a public service. No for profit model company would allow you to run >100% loss ratios every single year (premiums collected exceed the claims being paid out and/or admin expense incurred to do the insurance). People might then say insurance carriers ought to go find reinsurance. Reinsurers who might normally backstop some of these policies would look twice to deal with you if you are consistently knocking on their door year after year to claim reinsurance.

You cap rates to look good to the policyholders - in this case, I assume to get their votes for the next election and create a general sense of you're taken care of in this community (state). The fact that the Fair Play last resort state insurer is offering less coverage and higher premiums than State Farm is a damning indictment on how unsustainable the low premiums are in a regulated market.

In my memory, the only consumer market in Canada with regulated rates is personal auto insurance in Manitoba and British Columbia. Whilst private/for profit insurers can still offer something in those markets, the majority of the insurance is provided by Crown (read: provincial) corporations. The affordable insurance rates can in effect be artificial especially if politicians keep it below what actuaries predict it ought to be for the sake of placating the people (presumably for votes).

I am sure having regulated rates is someone's brain child on how to make insurance consumer friendly but it's only fixing one thing and creating problems at another end. This, by the way, also answers I believe guero who said rates ought to be raised to infinity for places that are impossible to insure. As a consumer you would end up in a real hell if you were legally obliged to get insurance but you either cannot afford it or no one will offer it to you because the government regulated rates are impossible to insure on.
 
Last edited:

"’The problem for Germany is we are not competitive,’ says Dr Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, head of the Bochum-based Center for Automotive Research. ‘Not just in cost terms, but also in terms of the new technologies which will run the world in future’”

“For union rep Steffen Schmidt, however, the solution is to go back to Germany's traditional industrial values. ‘We have to become a leader in innovation and technology again,’ he says. ‘Then we can keep high pay and good conditions for workers’”

Keep throwing money at it. Like a dart board.
 

"The rapid growth trajectory of China’s economy appears to have stalled, too—at least for now. As a share of U.S. GDP, China’s economy peaked at 74.9% in 2021 (narrowly besting Japan’s peak of 72.5% in 1995) and has since rolled over as its COVID-19 lockdowns dragged on and tariff-happy U.S. presidents (Trump, then Biden, now Trump again) have sought to reclaim America’s lost manufacturing clout. As a result, China’s growth has slowed, made worse by a population that’s now in outright decline."

American exceptionalism forever!
 


Did you build the wokeness and DEI so it’s part of the acquisition value or is it a byproduct of operating in those countries?
 
I've never been one for breakfast - especially eating out for a large plate @$28aud.

Most days for me breakfast is 2 x double shot small flat whites out of my machine at home.
About once a month I buy some bacon and have 2 or 3 days of one slice of bacon, one egg and half a tomato. As I only have max 2 meals a day, that's usually brunch @10.30am..
 
I've never been one for breakfast - especially eating out for a large plate @$28aud.

Most days for me breakfast is 2 x double shot small flat whites out of my machine at home.
About once a month I buy some bacon and have 2 or 3 days of one slice of bacon, one egg and half a tomato. As I only have max 2 meals a day, that's usually brunch @10.30am..

I thought you said you just have a coffee in the morning..black. Italian style.
 
“The tariffs are going forward on time, on schedule,”

…great. Which ones?

President Trump signed an executive order on February 1, 2025 (“Executive Order“), imposing the long-anticipated tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“U.S. Tariffs“).
  • Current status: Agreement reached, tariffs delayed
  • Timing: Implementation delayed until March 4, 2025
  • Tariff amount: 25% ad valorem duties on all goods except for energy and energy resources, which are subject to 10% ad valorem duties

OR….


On February 10 and 11, 2025, US President Donald Trump signed two executive orders1 that will impose, starting March 12, 2025, a 25% tariff on imports of steel and aluminum products from all countries, including Canada.
 

As of today: China 10%
2nd March: Canada 25%, Mexico 25%, China 20%
2nd April: Canada 25% + 25% for steel/aluminum, Mexico 25% + 25% for steel/aluminum, China 20%

...because it was getting confusing with so many deadlines, exceptions, etc.

Oh wait, what about the 10% relief just for oil from Canada.
 

As of today: China 10%
2nd March: Canada 25%, Mexico 25%, China 20%
2nd April: Canada 25% + 25% for steel/aluminum, Mexico 25% + 25% for steel/aluminum, China 20%

...because it was getting confusing with so many deadlines, exceptions, etc.

Oh wait, what about the 10% relief just for oil from Canada.
Softwood lumber will be around 40% with these added to existing tariffs.
 

Take it from us... endless presentations, gestures and money moving around in front of Kristi Noem and Tom Homan does nothing.

Also Bessent and Lutnick give you contradicting suggestions that lead to nowhere because in the end they just listen to the boss President.
 

00-economic-nowcast.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom