Hello David,
Your coming here will probably be appreciated by many people who view this thread around the world. There are several questions I would like to ask, but I will keep some of those questions until later. I would hope you would want to answer them, because it would solve many mysteries a number of us often wonder about.
If you don't mind, l would like to talk about the Ballantyne cashmere shawl cardigan made for Harrods in 2008. All that you say about the NM (tex) for the body panels, pockets and trims makes basic sense to a layman like myself, and it is what l thought was probably the case (trims are very thick like a 12 ply, body panel is thinnest like a 4 ply, pockets are slight thicker like a 6 ply....laymans terms) .
https://colourmart.com/about/knitting_properties (simple link for laymen)
Instead of asking too many pesky questions on technical things, l will keep it simple for myself and people who read this.
Main question
I would like to be able to have a cashmere shawl cardigan made to at least a thickness of that collar on the Ballantyne shawl cardigan, ie, the arms and the panels made to the thickness of that collar. Is this possible to do without doubling the two sections together, or would the entire cardigan need to be doubled over like the collar section?
Is it possible to make the knit even denser than the Ballantyne collar? Ie, having the density of the trims with the thickness of the collar?
The trim is 2/28's x 6 and is much denser than the collar. Is the collar the same TM (tex) as the trims?
This is very very interesting and makes sense based on the knitwear l have observed. Much of the Italian knitwear is of a loser weave despite having a gauge count as high as the Scottish knitwear (never really made sense until now). I suspect numerous cheaper Scottish knitwear uses machines (loser weave) while the better makers still use hand looms for their best sweaters/jumpers, and it would probably explain why some of the Scottish knitwear is so solid and hard wearing.
Interesting that #ballantynecrazyyank is first on your list. I hope you will let him know of this thread here.
I have some other general questions l would love to ask, but l don't want to overload you with too many at once.
Thanks again for posting here at this forum. I hope my questions are not too dumb, and l hope l am not too ignorant and annoying in the questions l ask.