A Futile and Stupid Gesture: The History of the First Trump Presidency & Q-Anon

Not necessarily. No union negotiated contracts and no government guaranteed benefit packages. Also maybe we can get some competent workers.

It'll go to the lowest bidder. Not necessarily a bad thing, but you might not get the most competent people either. This whole thing baffles me. Governing the country is the most important thing, and the jobs should be most highly paid to attract the best talent. You pay your college football coaches millions a year, but top civil servants make low six figures at best.
 
It'll go to the lowest bidder. Not necessarily a bad thing, but you might not get the most competent people either. This whole thing baffles me. Governing the country is the most important thing, and the jobs should be most highly paid to attract the best talent. You pay your college football coaches millions a year, but top civil servants make low six figures at best.

I would like to think competition has a positive correlation with competency. Our government is so bloated that I don't really see this as a negative act, the worst case scenario, no savings.
 
when it comes to government this is rarely the case.
Well I was referring to competitive bids in the hope the contract will go to the lowest bid with the highest talent. I can only hope.

But I think this was a good move on Trump's part, but again we will never know the true intentions and behind the scene moves.
 
Well I was referring to competitive bids in the hope the contract will go to the lowest bid with the highest talent. I can only hope.

But I think this was a good move on Trump's part, but again we will never know the true intentions and behind the scene moves.
Olo i work with people thar earn more than me because they are employees, yet they dont know shit. Im the one that has to figure shit for them
 
IMG_2057.webp
 
A theory of regulation.

I am working on a tentative theory of regulation. It goes like this:

  1. There are two kinds of regulations: custom regulations and bulk regulations.
  2. A custom regulation is designed to accomplish a particular goal. You want people to do something, so you write a rule mandating that they do it and punishing them if they don't. For instance, if you want U.S. companies to keep jobs in the U.S., you might write a rule to mandate that, and to "impose a 'very major' border tax on companies that move jobs outside the U.S." That is an example of a custom regulation, and it is good because it keeps jobs in the U.S.
  3. Bulk regulations are the kind that you buy by the yard, ones that you measure by quantity rather than purpose. They don't have a purpose, really; they are just generic "red tape." These are the regulations that presidents frequently announce they will cut in half, or freeze with an executive order. They're the regulations that come not from a reasoned desire to achieve a particular goal, but from a pure impulse to regulate. Bulk regulations are bad because they prevent businesses from doing business-y things without accomplishing anything good.
  4. All regulations are custom regulations.
  5. All discussion of "regulation" is about bulk regulations, which do not exist.
Anyway yesterday President Donald Trump met with business leaders and promised to "cut regulations" -- read: bulk regulations -- "by 75 percent." (If you want to "do something monstrous and special," he told them, "you're going to have your approvals really fast.") He does not seem to have gotten into specifics on which regulations he would cut, which fits neatly with my theory. On the other hand, he did promise to impose new regulations requiring companies to keep their operations in the U.S. ("When you have a company here, you have a plant here"), and increasing their taxes if they don't. Companies will also face new restrictions in trying to export goods, as Trump is planning to abandon various trade agreements. Those are of course important and burdensome new regulations, but they are customregulations, and so they are not covered by Trump's promise to cut bulk regulations by 75 percent. It all makes perfect sense, but you have to have a theory.

In perhaps related news, Trump announced a hiring freeze for federal workers while he is in the middle of hiring thousands of people to staff his administration. That sounds weird, until you realize that Trump is freezing bulk hiring while continuing custom hiring.
 
Before you have regulations you have standards, procedures and codes e.g. engineering codes for designing and building things. There is a strong argument that these technically and scientifically proven standards built-up in many cases over several decades are far more reliable than politically motivated regulations. As an example, the ASME and API codes from the USA are definitive in each edition for sound engineering practice.

Meanwhile, the BBC News presenters are going into meltdown: "With just a swish of his wrist...." complete with contorted facial expressions of the "newsreaders", Trump's suddenly approved wicked pipelines and infrastructure projects. What a twat! The inference being he is a dictator.
 
Now the BBC newsreader has confirmed they will be keeping us updated on their website of the "lack of progress in other areas" by Trump. Clearly, they're struggling to frame the investment in oil pipelines and new bridges/infrastructure as negative for the USA.
 
Now the BBC newsreader has confirmed they will be keeping us updated on their website of the "lack of progress in other areas" by Trump. Clearly, they're struggling to frame the investment in oil pipelines and new bridges/infrastructure as negative for the USA.
the pipelines are a definite negative.
 
A theory of regulation.

I am working on a tentative theory of regulation. It goes like this:

  1. There are two kinds of regulations: custom regulations and bulk regulations.

In perhaps related news, Trump announced a hiring freeze for federal workers while he is in the middle of hiring thousands of people to staff his administration. That sounds weird, until you realize that Trump is freezing bulk hiring while continuing custom hiring.

You should grow that into a general theory of custom/bulk. I'm sure there are more applications.
 
You should grow that into a general theory of custom/bulk. I'm sure there are more applications.

Not my work, I would never write that much for DW. Just copied the relevant section of an article. Matt Levine is the author if you want to follow him. Very insightful and funny, but also very niche so probably not your cup of tea.
 
I can only try to imagine, how the fucked up it must feel living in the US. You can agree and disagree with his base politics.
But the odd behaviours of the man, tweeting shit, lying like a little bitch, hiring the kind of ppl he told you he would fight against, denying climate science, strong-arming goverment institutions and doing media blackouts etc. Damn.. that is mental.
 
I can only try to imagine, how the fucked up it must feel living in the US. You can agree and disagree with his base politics.
But the odd behaviours of the man, tweeting shit, lying like a little bitch, hiring the kind of ppl he told you he would fight against, denying climate science, strong-arming goverment institutions and doing media blackouts etc. Damn.. that is mental.

It's bizarre, that's for sure. But on the upside, my estimate of the comedy from this is increasing exponentially every day. Spicer alone is worth a laugh just about every day.
 
It's bizarre, that's for sure. But on the upside, my estimate of the comedy from this is increasing exponentially every day. Spicer alone is worth a laugh just about every day.
It's actually pretty smart if you think about it like this - let them focus on the magic in the front while we're busy robbing the safe in the back.
 
It's actually pretty smart if you think about it like this - let them focus on the magic in the front while we're busy robbing the safe in the back.

I would agree, except it seems they are robbing the safe out in the middle of the road at this point.
 
Just found out the global derivatives market is now 1.2 quadrillion $ and the major players hold half of these 'bets'.

I'm sure Monkeyface will think this is fine and normal economics and moving to L.A. will concretize the illusion.
 
Whatever you say about Trump, he's not Hilary Clinton. He beats the alternative.

I think we have reached a fork in a road, or a sheer drop if you like: not only is globalism/no borders/world vs the forces of nationalism, there are two distinct visions of the future of humanity at work. Throw the moving force of Islamism into the mix and it's going to get very interesting indeed.

The liberal elites have underestimated the people's concern with security and identity. Their great love in with Islam no matter what has proved their undoing. Many are voting on this single issue now in Europe. It likely doesn't explain Trump's victory entirely. But from a European perspective, I mistrust the Obama's and Clinton's of this world who told us Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam. It's a breath of fresh air that you now have a president that will admit the truth: Islamic terrorism has everything to do with Islam.
 
I mistrust the Obama's and Clinton's of this world who told us Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam. It's a breath of fresh air that you now have a president that will admit the truth: Islamic terrorism has everything to do with Islam.

The reality's worse, Islamic terrorism is created wholly by Western countries to maintain history of war profiteering and global fascism. Even CNN's having trouble censoring all the truth:

 
Created wholly by Western countries is a bit far fetched. Case in point: Syria. Obama's administration's false narrative was wholly dictated hook line and sinker by the Gulf monarchies. Hilary herself was bought and owned by The Kingdom. When they spoke you had to do a double take, was it them, or the House of Saud or in the case of Obama, the Muslim Brotherhood speaking this voodoo?

In the politics of Islam, the Western nations are merely the proverbial useful idiots.

Trump saw the Emperor had no clothes and I will delight in the contorted twisted faces of the propaganda muppets in the MSM as they attempt to denigrate Trump's sound common sense policy of temporary prohibiting refugees from certain Islamic hell holes until proper vetting processes are established.

These young millenials and snowflakes should engage the critical part of their brain much more. If Hilary/Islamism/Globalism are so good, why do they need such a blatant propanda shilling media news machine urging you to emote and feel in certain ways? That alone should be a big red flag.
 
I hate Saudi Arabia as much as anyone else, but do you idiots realize that the bullshit that you are continuously spewing is "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" redux with a global, shadowy Semitic clique pulling the politicians by their strings through the strength and stealth of their finance networks and media corporations? It is fine that you are racist - most of the world is. Just stop putting on these airs and delude yourself into thinking you are smarter than everyone else. You are dumb as shit! Your ability to actually reflect on what passes through that cavernous void between your ears is ZERO.

"Critical part of the brain," indeed. Whatever that means?!!
 
Just found out the global derivatives market is now 1.2 quadrillion $ and the major players hold half of these 'bets'.

I'm sure Monkeyface will think this is fine and normal economics and moving to L.A. will concretize the illusion.

As always, you don't know what you're talking about. Research the difference between notional and actual cash flow payments. Notional numbers are meaningless stats.

Just like Trump you should think before you are outraged by something you see on the news.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/us/politics/donald-trump-presidency.html
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom