A Futile and Stupid Gesture: The History of the First Trump Presidency & Q-Anon

She wont be indicted, they changes the laws to allow for this. Whoever leaked it, on the other hand, is in trouble. It doesn't mean she's not a piece of shit.

BTW, that is the ugliest woman I have seen in years.
 
OfficePants said:
She wont be indicted, they changes the laws to allow for this. Whoever leaked it, on the other hand, is in trouble. It doesn't mean she's not a piece of shit.

BTW, that is the ugliest woman I have seen in years.
Click to expand...
Non white women top top ugly
 
C8kbpFjXcAAygXy.jpg


Of course that is malicious fake news, its not Obongo. Everyone knows the Trumpster is in all likelyhood an incestuous pedo:

 
Susan Rice's Careful Dance on Trump Surveillance
The former national security adviser said in an interview she had not conducted any political spying on the president-elect’s team, but suggested she may have asked for members’ names to be revealed to her.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/susan-rice-trump/521862/

Pay very close attention to what she says, its all worded very cleverly.

And guess what? After she chimes in, suddenly all the leftist media starts reporting.
 
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/

Susan Rice’s White House Unmasking: A Watergate-style Scandal

This is key to why she's WAY out of line:

The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests.
Click to expand...

By the way, have you noticed that there have been lots of intelligence leaks in the press?

There’s an old saying in the criminal law: The best evidence of a conspiracy is success.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
doghouse said:


Bannon off NSC.
Click to expand...


The reason is here:

A White House official said that Bannon was placed on the committee in part to monitor Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and never attended a meeting. He’s no longer needed with McMaster in charge of the council, the official said.
Click to expand...

But feel free to spin it.
 
OfficePants said:
What about Susan Rice, doghouse doghouse ? You're avoiding that story like the plague.
Click to expand...

Because it isn't a story. People talked to people under surveillance. They got listened on. That is literally exactly how the process is supposed to work.

You are also that guy still seriously bringing up Benghazi.

OfficePants said:
The reason is here:
Click to expand...

Read what you quoted and get back to me once you realize how insanely idiotic it is from all perspectives.
 
^ Indeed, its quite absurd.

doghouse doghouse - Susan Rice is a known liar, and the NSA's job is to consume intelligence. You're missing the point completely. She unmasked names for political reasons. No reasonable person would suggest it had a real intelligence purpose.

Regarding Bannon, its clear there were concerns about Flynn, they should have never given him the position. That said, they wanted to watch him.
 
Rice was politically motivated.

There has been some pretty terrible spin from all sides over the last decade, but the Bannon/NSC spins have to be some of the lamest. I don't know why he's leaving, but if you're buying the no more need to watch Flynn or undoing Rice's damage lines, you better recheck your water for fluoride.
 
LOL, congressional Democrats whining about "congressional approval", who can take these idiots seriously?

This is the party that brought this guy into office with his phony "red line":

 
That moment when those that you were against since the beginning are now cheering for you.
 
Runways can be repaired in 24hrs. The goal of an airfield strike is usually the planes, fuel, munitions and pilots. Seems these got awsay. Makes me wonder if Trump gave Putin a courtesy call before launch.
 
Dropbear said:
Runways can be repaired in 24hrs. The goal of an airfield strike is usually the planes, fuel, munitions and pilots. Seems these got awsay. Makes me wonder if Trump gave Putin a courtesy call before launch.
Click to expand...

Apparently a courtesy call was made. Planes destroyed because who can scramble sleepy Syrian gas bomb droppers at 4:00AM and the Tommahawks were "no crater" ones.

Trump did this to show Leitmotif Leitmotif that Russophilia is not the way.
 
Well, that's about killed off the Trump is an agent of Putin conspiracy theory. Both the Democrats and their Gladio FBI agents are going to look like terminal fools if they continue with the false narrative. It's looks vindicative and no more than a soft coup vendetta to bring down a President. Check mate.
 
Fake retaliation for fake attack. Can't wait until the IC calls this Putin's master plan.
Read that the "Pentagon" is investigating whether Russia is also responsible for the alleged "gas" attack.
 
I value a person that knows their strengths and weaknesses, and adjusts their environment so they can be more productive.

Others may view such a person as stupid, inept, or lacking attention span. Or perhaps reporters may imply it.

Smart people create a working environment so they can be productive. I am sure Trump saw the briefings and realized right away this could be presented better. But again, others may try and mock this.
 
OfficePants said:
I value a person that knows their strengths and weaknesses, and adjusts their environment so they can be more productive.

Others may view such a person as stupid, inept, or lacking attention span. Or perhaps reporters may imply it.

Smart people create a working environment so they can be productive. I am sure Trump saw the briefings and realized right away this could be presented better. But again, others may try and mock this.
Click to expand...

Smart people can process information quickly regardless of the format...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)
Back
Top Bottom