- Messages
- 22,331
We've already regressed to feudalism. 1% holds over 50% of the wealth.
Yes but many serfs are still able to bespoke burlap workwear
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We've already regressed to feudalism. 1% holds over 50% of the wealth.
Donald Trump's speech in Warsaw sought to redefine the West around religion rather than democracy
Speech made no mention of religious tolerance or the right-wing Polish government's authoritarian crackdowns on judges and journalists
President Donald Trump addressing the crowds at Krasinski Square, in Warsaw REUTERS/Kacper Pempel
Donald Trump sought to redefine the West through religion rather than democracy as he warned Western civilisations were at risk of declining.
Speaking in Warsaw ahead of the G20 summit, Mr Trump called for the defence of Western values in terms of religion and culture against radical Islam.
In his address, Mr Trump repeatedly made references to God, faith, tradition, national sovereignty and family, themes which were likely to resonate with fervent Christian Poles.
“The people of Poland, the people of America, and the people of Europe still cry out ‘We want God'," he said.
"We put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the centre of our lives," he said.
The speech made no mention of religious tolerance and Mr Trump did not say anything about the right-wing government's authoritarian crackdowns on judges and journalists, which have upset EU leaders.
The EU launched an investigation into Poland last year, citing threats to the rule of law incompatible with EU values.
On Krasinski Square, a site which commemorates the 1944 Warsaw Uprising against the Nazis, Mr Trump's message was well received by cheering crowds.
Poland's right-wing nationalist ruling Law and Justice party was elected on an Eurosceptic and anti-immigration agenda, which promotes family-focused welfare spending and threatened to ban abortion and in-vitro fertilisation.
Last year, Polish President Andrzei Duda took part in a religious ceremony that officially recognised Jesus as the King of Poland.
Inside the EU, senior officials are reportedly concerned Mr Trump's speech could boost populist far-right politicians with a similar agenda across Europe.
Mr Trump's speech was a clear sign of his vision for foreign policy.
"The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive. Do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any costs? Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and courage to preserve our civilisation in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?" he said.
Former Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski told Bloomberg the speech made reference to Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilisations" theory in which he argued that the West's ideological contest with the former Soviet Union would be followed by a growing struggle between religious blocs.
Many world leaders now see Mr Huntington's theory as something to avoid, especially when fighting Islamist terrorism. But some of Mr Trump's aides have embraced the idea of a war between the Christian West and Islam.
Mr Sikorski said: "The Polish government had reasons to be very pleased with it [Mr Trump's speech], because it very much echoes their philosophy."
But the former head of Poland's constitutional court, Jerzy Stępień, an opponent to the ruling Law and Justice Party, told the news agency: "For me talking about Western civilisation without mentioning rule of law, democracy and human rights isn't possible. I'm not sure how President Trump defines Western civilisation but for me these attributes are indispensable."
The values outlined by the US President as representing Western civilisations are likely to clash with those promoted by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose differences with Mr Trump are well known.
From climate change and migration to free trade and the rule of law, Ms Merkel is expected to make her case heard at the G20 meeting.
But as he landed in Hamburg, Mr Trump reaffirmed the message he sent to Poland and tweeted: "The West will never be broken. Our values will prevail. Our people will thrive and our civilisation will triumph."
![]()
Take your kid to work day.
Nice to see Merkel brought her BDSM sub, pretty boy Trudeau. Meanwhile Ivanka does not look terribly happy at the lack of pocket parrots displayed by the Chinamen.![]()
Take your kid to work day.
Nice to see Merkel brought her BDSM sub, pretty boy Trudeau. Meanwhile Melania does not look terribly happy at the lack of pocket parrots displayed by the Chinamen.
Also, that "Trump by himself" picture is another "Look! There's no one at the inauguration". When will they learn.
Poland, Hungary et al are right to hold out against Merkel's follies and quiet tyranny. Where does this strength come from? Does not religion form part of the culture of these countries, or is the currency of religion only reserved for Islam?
The speech was right, delivered at the correct pitch: the West is the best and part of our heritage and values comes from the Christian tradition. Time to man-up and stand-up for our culture, identity and our civilization.
Sorry, was looking at tits. Jokes aside, I have no idea as to why I made such a foolish mistake.That's Ivanka...
It is the Cold War all over again, where the West will have to face against "Godless" Communism, but this time the enemy has another God. I loathe to think that the day will come when atheists will be discriminated against and not hold public office...oh, that's right, in several US that's already a thing.All the Trump chatter aside, the idea of returning to a God-centric conceptualization of Western Civilization disturbs me on several levels.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ned-western-values-around-faith-not-democracy
Augustine's incredibly influential City of God / City of Man dichotomy stifled technological, cultural, and social growth in Europe for a millennia. While I think that the secularization of the West is irreversible (thankfully) and that it is a shame that humanistic values haven't coalesced in a way as to completely fill the void of religious values, this movement, a decade in the making, is alarming. The dignity of a human, and all that it entails, is fundamental to what makes the West so wonderful. How we interpret that dignity and what follows may be fiercely debated, but it is nevertheless a principle at the core of the West. I have no wish to return to the City of God at the expense of the City of Man.
Anyways, the Christian tradition isn't our culture at all. The Christian tradition gave us the dark ages. The renaissance tradition gave us the enlightenment, freedom and economic development the West is known for. One can practice whatever religion one wants in the private space, but it would be foolish to think relgion is necessary for the West in the public space.
Crikey, we're going to post whether the exit of the Victorian age into the 20th century heralded truly secular governments (or failing that governments that worship non-religious messianic/dictator idols). That's going to be another few pages in this thread. The Soviet Union was the byproduct of that thinking - par excellence. Also 4am ET? Are you on Europe time or west coast time?
The speech was right, delivered at the correct pitch: the West is the best and part of our heritage and values comes from the Christian tradition. Time to man-up and stand-up for our culture, identity and our civilization.
even a poor reading of this article would prove this is a huge nothingburger. of course its top spot on the huffpo.This is it (for Jr and Kushner at least):
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/...an_government_sought_to_aid_trumps_candidacy/
even a poor reading of this article would prove this is a huge nothingburger. of course its top spot on the huffpo.
TLDR:
The West is awesome, but Christianity has little to do with it.
You mean like Clinton getting money from the Saudis?“The law states that no person shall knowingly solicit or accept from a foreign national any contribution to a campaign of an item of value,”
You mean like Clinton getting money from the Saudis?
Can we stop with this back and forth nonsense, all canditates were terrible. The shiniest turd won, I'd rather have him than her. Not that much would change, mind you, but the waking up of people gives me hope.
I am Italian, but I'm allowed to have a preference in foreign politics, no?Aren't you supposed to be Italian?
Anyhoo, I'm not sure a hundred thousand aggrieved worthless motherfuckers counts as a "waking up" of anything.
Doghouse is an elitist. You're not going to make any headway arguing this line with him.I am Italian, but I'm allowed to have a preference in foreign politics, no?
Are you referring to people finally realising that the current establishment is in no way, shape or form advocating their causes but rather is under the agenda of a select few in the EU and USA? If so, please explain how they are "aggrieved worthless motherfuckers". But be quick, before too many laws that restrict free speech are enacted.
Elitist or plebeian is irrelevant to me, what I care about is intellectual honesty. Being unable to assess the current situation as an utter failure for society means that you are either intellectually impaired or that you willingly ignore facts. I'm absolutely fine with differing positions, as long as they're not "multiculturalism, third wave feminism and enrichment from migrants is the way to progress".Doghouse is an elitist. You're not going to make any headway arguing this line with him.
fair enough, but if you're arguing to someone that "society would be better off as a whole", yet they don't give a fuck about society, especially the segment that would be benefiting, is this really productive?Elitist or plebeian is irrelevant to me, what I care about is intellectual honesty. Being unable to assess the current situation as an utter failure for society means that you are either intellectually impaired or that you willingly ignore facts. I'm absolutely fine with differing positions, as long as they're not "multiculturalism, third wave feminism and enrichment from migrants is the way to progress".
I am Italian, but I'm allowed to have a preference in foreign politics, no?
Are you referring to people finally realising that the current establishment is in no way, shape or form advocating their causes but rather is under the agenda of a select few in the EU and USA? If so, please explain how they are "aggrieved worthless motherfuckers". Be quick, before too many laws that restrict free speech are enacted.
Doghouse is an elitist. You're not going to make any headway arguing this line with him.
I am Italian, but I'm allowed to have a preference in foreign politics, no?
Are you referring to people finally realising that the current establishment is in no way, shape or form advocating their causes but rather is under the agenda of a select few in the EU and USA? If so, please explain how they are "aggrieved worthless motherfuckers". Be quick, before too many laws that restrict free speech are enacted.
Makes them look stupid but this is nothing new.
The funniest part to me is how insulated his idiot kids have been from failure their wholes lives that they honestly can't conceive how dumb they are.
Yeah, I still doubt there is collusion, but I am beginning to believe that if there actually was collusion by those within the Trump camp, it was accidental and a product of inexperience. It is very easy to imagine Don Jr getting information and releasing it (which would amount to working with the Russians to undermine Clinton) without really understanding the ramification of what he'd be doing.
a publicist calls your kid up and says "hey we've got dirt on your boss' enemy at work". who kid wouldn't go "great!"? this whole thing is so exceptionally stupid.
a publicist calls your kid up and says "hey we've got dirt on your boss' enemy at work". who kid wouldn't go "great!"? this whole thing is so exceptionally stupid.
True - insta - but a the same time you can't commit a treasonous act and then use your defence as " Sorry I'm just stupid" - well I suppose you can because intent matters - disregard my previous comment.Depends on who the publicist is. If it is a publicist from a long-time rival foreign power and is explicitly identified as part of an effort of that foreign power to meddle in the election, then any kid with a decent head on his shoulders would back away quickly and maybe report it to the authorities.
That being said, stupidity =/= treason.
Depends on who the publicist is. If it is a publicist from a long-time rival foreign power and is explicitly identified as part of an effort of that foreign power to meddle in the election, then any kid with a decent head on his shoulders would back away quickly and maybe report it to the authorities.
That being said, stupidity =/= treason.