Pauly Chase
Hip Dairy Farmer
- Messages
- 6,663
I have always thought navy and black is a "no-no"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got influenced by the forum.
Navy and black is classic, formal and the quintessential business combo. But the beauty of navy is that Brown, burgundy and oxblood also look extremely sharp. as long as the brown is not the lightest tans eg bandaid it works well. The forum crowd have strayed away from black but it still holds a place especially for people of a certain age as well as in the UK
Agreed. It also depends on the "navy" of course. Darker navy you really don't want anything lighter than espresso brown or oxblood shoes IMO. Lighter AF blues will look fine with black all the way up to mahogany or dark tan. Fabric weight and pattern also plays a role here. A lightweight plain mohair fr'instance will pair better with tan shoes than a heavy flannel chalkstripe, even if both are the same shade of blue.
And yes, bandaid/baby poo shoes look crap with anything, unless they are suede in which case there are a few exceptions.
Who dat? First fit that I can't spot any fault. Not a fan of more than 1" cuffs, but that's minor.
I think you are wrong - my studies show its 62.54% of the time.Navy suit + black shoes > navy suit + brown shoes, at least 60% of the time.
Pauly - it depends which forum - if its this forum -........... well I can only apologize and offer help.I got influenced by the forum.
Twas not this forumPauly - it depends which forum - if its this forum -........... well I can only apologize and offer help.
No to the no-no. Navy suit and black shoes is perfectly fine.
navy blue + brown is a big no no, though
simple and nice. like the square
![]()
also the shirt placket is wrong, totally.
now think of his earrings and untrimmed beard(most of the time).
also the shirt placket is wrong, totally. its a Luxire btw ...
Pauly - it depends which forum - if its this forum -........... well I can only apologize and offer help.
For once I could not see earrings or beard. I have no problem with plackets; I have them. It is simply a nice look. Clean, simple and not embellished.
fair enough, but I cannot divide the fit pic from the whole pic just because the head is cut out this time.
I'm talking about the wrong placket, anyway.
the look is unremarkable, true.
Explain the "wrong placket" I don't understand
dress shirts, especially with french cuffs - french placket, two hole buttons
casual shirts - italian placket + do whatever you feel that makes you happy
I bet butch doesn't know that ... although its basic knowledge. fresh from the drawing board.
The traditional placket is still alive and well in North America both for barrel and French cuffs.
Of course I am a tacky
Non-placket is for steers and queers I heard.
The traditional placket is still alive and well in North America both for barrel and French cuffs.
Of course I am a tacky
Non-placket is for steers and queers I heard.
Well it's probably fair (laissez faire?) to say French cuffs are more formal than barrel. IMO they really should only be worn with a suit & tie, with some exceptions. (Don C for example wears FC shirts with tweed sometimes to good effect but generally a button cuff looks better in that context - as evidenced by the fact most of Sugarbitch's FC shirts and shiny cufflinks look ridiculous with his rustic sport coats.)
French front is also more formal than visible placket, and a more natural pairing for French cuffs (as is a fly front for e.g. with black tie rig). The fact that French fronts and French cuffs both sport the same froggy moniker is probably not a coincidence...
The traditional placket is still alive and well in North America both for barrel and French cuffs.
that wasn't your question? just because its wrong according to the traditional rules it can be still alive? not?
Traditional rules are for people who are inept at dressing.
I am the ineptest dresser. I aspire to DC & IS
Wrong is the wrong word. It is still used quite often meaning that convention is not absolute. it differs from what many might choose to do. There are other fare more egregious faux pas
so, why are we discussing the emperors beard? just don't twist my words, please. its wrong(according to the traditional rules), its not egregious and its not a faux pas per se. of course, conventions are not absolute. they are guidelines, though.
its just funny that people who call themselves an authority in menswear do it. arrived?
I recommend hitting the local all you can eat buffet. Then we can either work on your Jewishness or haircut.