Climate Change Is The Biggest Threat & Will Kill Us All

www.bbc.com

2024 'virtually certain' to be world's warmest year on record

It is also set to be the world's first breach of 1.5C of warming across an entire calendar year.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

How are these actually calculated? I don't think there is any part of Earth where you didn't experience >1.5c over average norm at least a few months other than the depths of Antarctica. And this has been going for years.
 
This video is just beautiful. A strong pro renewable energy politicians tries so hard to believe it is the future, but Dr Adi Paterson is having none of it and tells him why renewable energy is an impossible dream.

When the MP hears things he doesn't want to hear (3:30) he chances the subject. And when he changes the subject he still gets his backside handed to him.

Btw,the bloke in the background has some amazing argyle sox

güero güero will probably love this.​

 
Last edited:
The Shooman said:
This video is just beautiful. A strong pro renewable energy politicians tries so hard to believe it is the future, but Dr Adi Paterson is having none of it and tells him why renewable energy is an impossible dream.

When the MP hears things he doesn't want to hear (3:30) he chances the subject. And when he changes the subject he still gets his backside handed to him.

Btw,the bloke in the background has some amazing argyle sox

güero güero will probably love this.​

Click to expand...

You can feel his frustration with having to explain this over and over and over and over again.
 
güero said:
You can feel his frustration with having to explain this over and over and over and over again.
Click to expand...

The problem is that this man (chair) has an agenda, he is not there to find out the truth. He needs to find an expert that will pedal the lie, but now reality is starting to mug the aussie government.

The lie we have been told is:
1). setting up nuclear in Australia will take a very long time (longer than the renewable network),
2). will be far more costly over the long term than renewable infrastructure,
3). renewable energy will be reliable.

The other issue as l understand it is: rare earths needed to build the renewable infrastructure over and over again are not plentiful enough (an impossible dream), and the cost of rebuilding the renewable infrastructure will far out weigh the cost of nuclear in the long term.

The U.S has voted to turn it's back on renewables, and l think other countries will follow suit. As l have said previously, renewables will be sent to the dustbin of history within 10 years.
 
Last edited:
The Shooman said:
The problem is that this man (chair) has an agenda, he is not there to find out the truth.
Click to expand...
Most often they don't, at least not in public, which is why it is difficult for politicians to get real experts (usually experts are fairly busy and like to get paid for their work), unless they are summoned and have to testify.
 
Another reason why renewables are a bad idea - there will be wind turbines and solar panels everywhere.

Here is a quote from our Victorian government report released yesterday.
Analysis indicates that to meet net-zero targets using onshore renewables could require up to 70 per cent of Victoria’s agricultural land to host wind and solar farms

Coastal views = gone
Farmlands = taken over by force by govt

Renewables have a short lifespan,so all those millions or billions of toxic renewables will need to go to landfill eventually, and then billions or trillions spend replacing everything.

Our landscapes and seascapes are going to look very ugly. The greenies complain about clearing land for a dam because species will get killed, but they never complain about clearing millions of aches of land for renewables.

When one uses common sense one can work out who these people really are. Who are the greens really?...obviously not environmentalists. Why are these renewable people?...obviously not for the environment. So many contracts are signed to silence people too. Renewables are the devil's work.
 
The Shooman said:
Our landscapes and seascapes are going to look very ugly. The greenies complain about clearing land for a dam because species will get killed, but they never complain about clearing millions of aches of land for renewables.
Click to expand...
Shooey have you ever seen an oil well? Or looked at an oil drilling station in the ocean? How about a tar sands extraction site?
 
Grand Potentate said:
Shooey have you ever seen an oil well? Or looked at an oil drilling station in the ocean? How about a tar sands extraction site?
Click to expand...

Or this, for that matter.

1731922234471.webp


1731922250349.webp
 
Awesome, so Tuvalu isn't drowning, despite sea levels there rising faster than elsewhere, but it has been growing:
www.nature.com

Patterns of island change and persistence offer alternate adaptation pathways for atoll nations - Nature Communications

Inundation and erosion could make many atoll islands uninhabitable over the next century. Here the authors present an analysis of change in the atoll nation of Tuvalu that shows a 2.9% increase in land area over the past four decades, with 74% of islands increasing in size, despite rising sea...
www.nature.com www.nature.com
 
güero said:
Awesome, so Tuvalu isn't drowning, despite sea levels there rising faster than elsewhere, but it has been growing:
www.nature.com

Patterns of island change and persistence offer alternate adaptation pathways for atoll nations - Nature Communications

Inundation and erosion could make many atoll islands uninhabitable over the next century. Here the authors present an analysis of change in the atoll nation of Tuvalu that shows a 2.9% increase in land area over the past four decades, with 74% of islands increasing in size, despite rising sea...
www.nature.com www.nature.com
Click to expand...

Love how the media says islands are going underwater when the science shows these numerous islands are getting bigger. Have shown science previously.

Love how media say numerous countries are losing crops through climate change and citizens are mass migrating to other countries to avoid starvation when the stats clearly show crop yields in those countries at their highest in decades. Have shown science previously.

Why are the media lying, do they have an agenda?
 
Even when facts are pointed out to the media they still ignore it. Many from the media are like rabbits (dumb as they come), but other clearly know what is going on but must do as the swamp tells them....this was exposed during covid when various media heads were taped secretly exposing their agenda. Remember the CNN head getting exposed.

I could call the `fake news media' unkind names, but l better not.
 
Last edited:
A documentary by respected journalist Chris Uhlmann. He has always had good nuggets of information about the climate change lies.

Lets see how good his documentary is. Starts getting good from about 17 mins
 
Last edited:
www.dailymail.co.uk

What the global elite reveal to Davos sex workers

EXCLUSIVE: Salome Balthus, 40, is a high-end escort and author from Berlin who has travelled to Davos, Switzerland, to meet up with clients during the World Economic Forum (WEF).
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

'The elephant in the room is climate change. Everyone knows it can't be prevented any more,' she said, adding that the 'super rich' could generally be split into two groups on the topic.
'The one group thinks it only affects the poor, the "not-white race", while the others fear that it could get worse but there's no sense in trying to do anything about it so they just enjoy themselves,' she told MailOnline.
Click to expand...
 
www.nature.com

The environmental burden of the United States’ bitcoin mining boom - Nature Communications

The paper maps air pollution from power plants supplying electricity to US Bitcoin mines. It finds that 1.9 million people in 2022-2023 breathed toxic amounts of Bitcoin mine attributable pollution, particularly around New York City and Houston.
www.nature.com www.nature.com

Abstract​

Bitcoin mines—massive computing clusters generating cryptocurrency tokens—consume vast amounts of electricity. The amount of fine particle (PM2.5) air pollution created because of their electricity consumption and its effect on environmental health is pending. In this study, we located the 34 largest mines in the United States in 2022, identified the electricity-generating plants that responded to them, and pinpointed communities most harmed by Bitcoin mine-attributable air pollution. From mid-2022 to mid-2023, the 34 mines consumed 32.3 terawatt-hours of electricity—33% more than Los Angeles—85% of which came from fossil fuels. We estimated that 1.9 million Americans were exposed to ≥0.1 μg/m3 of additional PM2.5 pollution from Bitcoin mines, often hundreds of miles away from the communities they affected. Americans living in four regions—including New York City and near Houston—were exposed to the highest Bitcoin mine-attributable PM2.5 concentrations (≥0.5 μg/m3) with the greatest health risks.
Click to expand...

emphasis mine
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom