If society is taken to be inherently oppressive, the notion of a common good disappears
unherd.com
Both radical movements are shot through with paranoia, emotivism and religious caricature
unherd.com
I agree that there is some pressure now to adopt certain language and to eschew other language, and to adopt (or at least, to publicly profess) certain beliefs and to eschew other beliefs. I understand that some people disagree with this; some people think that it has gone too far; some people think that it tramples on free speech, or their right to free expression.
Howeer, whenever I read articles like this, stridently complaining about how "the Left" is ruining everything, how we're all "woke" now and so on, I can't help but think that - perhaps deliberately - the arguments tend to be very short-sighted, focussing only on the present and ignoring the past.
Certainly, nowadays there is a move to use gender-inclusive language, to be considerate of race and so on and so forth. Some may think that is a fantastic thing, others clearly think it's gone too far and is totally out of hand and oppressive.
But if you think that your speech and right to expression is limited now, think back only 40-50 years ago (or less, in some cases). Nowadays, you can't walk around disparaging homosexuals without being criticised - but go back a few decades and you'd lose your job and be a social outcast if you even went so far as to openly discuss homosexuality, or admitted to being homosexual. People were openly - and in some cases, entirely legally - discriminated against on the basis of their origin, skin colour or religion. If you advocated for equal rights for women, you could lose your job. In Australia, women were legally paid two-thirds as much as men for doing precisely the same job. If you advocated for unions and labour rights, you could be blacklisted as a Communist troublemaker.
All of those things were commonplace and largely accepted just a couple of generations ago, well within living memory. Self-censorship was common. Discrimination was common - and in many cases, entirely legal.
So political correctness and the insistence upon certain views and the pressure to express certain views existed decades ago. However, unlike today, it existed on the conservative side of society/politics and it was very widespread. That is almost totally ignored in today's conservative arguments.
Of course, that doesn't mean that "wokeness" hasn't gone too far. Nor does it mean that shouting down others for expressing unpopular views is a good thing. We should be open to diverse views, and open to debating those views.
However, nowadays, it seems that all too often conservative commentators of various stripes like to use this idea of "wokeness" as a political hatchet with which to attack "the Left". It strikes me that they do this not so much to score any sort of victory against political correctness but, rather, to signal to like-minded people that they're on the same side, fighting the same fight against the enemy. In other words, by inveighing against "wokeness" and political correctness, these people are engaging in their own form of virtue-signalling to each other - whilst loudly decrying virtue signalling at the same time. It's really very ironic.