The War in the Ukraine

Who Will Win

  • The West

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • America

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Right

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Good

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Evil

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Putin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Zelensky

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Prigozhin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trump

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
Well, I'm afraid they're going to have to make some very difficult decisions unless they want to see Ukrainians thrown to the dogs and live next door to a fascist like Putin.

This is not the first time I would be disappointed but not surprised by the actions of our glorious leaders.
 
The West is going to have to go I'm crazier than you Kissinger style and stand up and face him down starting with Finland which as of yesterday, is a member if NATO and we have thermonuclear weapons there pointing at you personally and we don't need your oil & gas with immediate effect because we're going to drill baby, drill like never before. Now fuck off back to your dacha.

This thug isn't going to stop after the destruction of the Ukraine.

We need to man up and get some of that toxic masculinity on the go.
 
Last edited:
I think this is largely a question of degrees of freedom. The UK is not reliant on Russia for its energy (I think less than 5% comes from there?), so he can play the Rooster all he wants. European leaders are scared shitless of the effect on the economy a sudden loss of supply would look like. Poland, as you point out, being a notable exception.
Well, I'm afraid they're going to have to make some very difficult decisions unless they want to see Ukrainians thrown to the dogs and live next door to a fascist like Putin.
The European leaders are constrained by bureaucracy and sadly, ideology. Noted here in the Netherlands they're still planning on getting rid of a significant percentage of live stock farms to meet EU nitrogen targets and re-wild the land. The Netherlands is for the most part like England, a garden and lots of it, has never been wild, it was reclaimed from the sea. The realpolitik is a bit beyond them. At this late hour, do we really need to be sacrificing potential food security for Brussels-centric 5 and 10 year plans? The shortages are already on the way in: try getting sunflower oil here, it's all gone.

And what of Mutti Merkel's legacy? We were told in the Trump era, she was the de facto serious leader of the free world as she put us into the mouth of the crocodile. Never since Jimmy Savile has someone's mythical reputation been soiled so fast.
 
The West is going to have to go I'm crazier than you Kissinger style and stand up and face him down starting with Finland which as of yesterday, is a member if NATO and we have thermonuclear weapons there pointing at you personally and we don't need your oil & gas with immediate effect because we're going to drill baby, drill like never before. Now fuck off back to your dacha.

This thug isn't going to stop after the destruction of the Ukraine.

We need to man up and get some of that toxic masculinity on the go.
ah so i see you've joined the 'nuclear war isn't bad' camp.

i'm sure this will end well.
 
The European leaders are constrained by bureaucracy and sadly, ideology.
you can't say this on one hand and then bemoan putin being a thug and a dictator on the other. i know you're not big on consistency but even for you this is ridiculous.

Noted here in the Netherlands they're still planning on getting rid of a significant percentage of live stock farms to meet EU nitrogen targets and re-wild the land. The Netherlands is for the most part like England, a garden and lots of it, has never been wild, it was reclaimed from the sea. The realpolitik is a bit beyond them. At this late hour, do we really need to be sacrificing potential food security for Brussels-centric 5 and 10 year plans? The shortages are already on the way in: try getting sunflower oil here, it's all gone.
what do sunflower oil and livestock farms have to do with one another???

And what of Mutti Merkel's legacy? We were told in the Trump era, she was the de facto serious leader of the free world as she put us into the mouth of the crocodile. Never since Jimmy Savile has someone's mythical reputation been soiled so fast.
can't really argue with you on this one.
 
Fuck. I’ve followed this guy for a few years and he seems like a decent guy.

 
Fuck. I’ve followed this guy for a few years and he seems like a decent guy.


If it's the same unit then yesterday their Facebook post was called fake news.

"Earlier, a post on the Facebook page of the 36th marine brigade of the Ukrainian armed forces said they were preparing for the 'last battle' for the besieged southern city as they are running out of food, ammunition and medical supplies.

Petro Andryushchenko, an aide to the Mariupol mayor, said on social media that the marines’ Facebook page had been hacked and that the post was fake.

Deputy mayor Serhiy Orlov also told the BBC: 'The information about the marines is fake. I don’t comment on fakes.'"

 
If it's the same unit then yesterday their Facebook post was called fake news.

"Earlier, a post on the Facebook page of the 36th marine brigade of the Ukrainian armed forces said they were preparing for the 'last battle' for the besieged southern city as they are running out of food, ammunition and medical supplies.

Petro Andryushchenko, an aide to the Mariupol mayor, said on social media that the marines’ Facebook page had been hacked and that the post was fake.

Deputy mayor Serhiy Orlov also told the BBC: 'The information about the marines is fake. I don’t comment on fakes.'"


It’s real.

 
ah so i see you've joined the 'nuclear war isn't bad' camp.

i'm sure this will end well.
It's about optics and not playing up to Putin's belief that the West is weak, decadent and unable to defend it's freedom.
what do sunflower oil and livestock farms have to do with one another???
You need control access to basic cooking commodities and food. If you don't have stock, or you can't produce meat, you have to rely on someone else. Like what we did with our energy policy. We need to be taking control of strategic assets, energy and food production and manufacturing.
It’s real.


Some are going to surrender, as a non-military man, I don't judge them. But as Putin is sending Ukrainian civilians to Siberian and Arctic camps, and disappeared dozens of Chernobyl workers, if I was a soldier I would like to think, I would attempt a break-out or fight to death rather than be taken by Putin's orcs. Unless they're saved by a prison swap, I imagine their future is very grim indeed.
 
I wonder why he wasn't wanted?

1649778063913.webp
 
It's about optics and not playing up to Putin's belief that the West is weak, decadent and unable to defend it's freedom.

Aren't we all three?

We've become what the Ottoman Empire was going into WW1. The sick man of the world.
 
We are at heightened alert now, anticipating Russian attacks using CBERNE weapons against dissidents and opposition figures living here.
 
It's about optics and not playing up to Putin's belief that the West is weak, decadent and unable to defend it's freedom.

You need control access to basic cooking commodities and food. If you don't have stock, or you can't produce meat, you have to rely on someone else. Like what we did with our energy policy. We need to be taking control of strategic assets, energy and food production and manufacturing.

Some are going to surrender, as a non-military man, I don't judge them. But as Putin is sending Ukrainian civilians to Siberian and Arctic camps, and disappeared dozens of Chernobyl workers, if I was a soldier I would like to think, I would attempt a break-out or fight to death rather than be taken by Putin's orcs. Unless they're saved by a prison swap, I imagine their future is very grim indeed.


I remember seeing some Americans near Kiev and they said at best X would happen and at worse they would be shot. For foreign fighters I am sure at best you will be executed with a bullet. Much worse awaits you when you surrender.
 

I remember seeing some Americans near Kiev and they said at best X would happen and at worse they would be shot. For foreign fighters I am sure at best you will be executed with a bullet. Much worse awaits you when you surrender.

Asking was planning to become a Ukraine citizen when he married his fiancé from there, but last I heard he had not. I’m. It sure if that would’ve helped or hindered, tbh.

Meanwhile, this guy appears to have untreated TB while rotting away in a Russian jail:

 
We are at heightened alert now, anticipating Russian attacks using CBERNE weapons against dissidents and opposition figures living here.
Well, they've certainly taken a lot of radioactive sources back with them.

My missus is well on heightened alert now, as is the team she works in.
 
According to Alexander Nezorov, who is in hiding, but I understand not in Russia, there's been an epic failure of Russian intelligence agents, reminiscent of Graham Greene's Our Man In Havana, but with many more players. The Russians were paying hundreds of assets in the Ukraine who were all telling them the same: the Russian army would be welcomed as liberators.


He's also very sartorially elegant.
 

"But Tigray province in Ethiopia, Yemen, Afghanistan or Syria are not receiving the same attention, he said.

'I don't know if the world really gives equal attention to black and white lives,' Mr Tedros told a news conference."

Last I checked, Yemenis, Syrians, and the multi ethnic Afghanis did not believe they were black.

Who gave him a right to make this kind of pronouncement? Why doesn't he go back to his strong suit? Giving poor or passe advice on coronavirus.
 

"But Tigray province in Ethiopia, Yemen, Afghanistan or Syria are not receiving the same attention, he said.

'I don't know if the world really gives equal attention to black and white lives,' Mr Tedros told a news conference."

Last I checked, Yemenis, Syrians, and the multi ethnic Afghanis did not believe they were black.

Who gave him a right to make this kind of pronouncement? Why doesn't he go back to his strong suit? Giving poor or passe advice on coronavirus.
What a clown, it's our backyard so will get more attention.

It's about optics too: when the Ukrainian women and children refugees arrive they're exhausted, when the dinghy folk arrive they raise a fist in exaltation and in the UK, they get whisked away to hotel accommodation, dole money and preferential health treatment as befits refugee status. After 2-3 years, they're still there, so they send to them to another hotel. Sad, but true in a lot of cases. Here in the Netherlands they put them in hangers and camps to process them and most of the authorities who took them in during the 2015 wave, don't want to participate anymore and want rid. Combined with the chronic housing shortage, with the real refugees from our neighborhood arriving, it doesn't look good.

I would like to ask Mr Tedros why is it the Ukrainian refugees can be integrated into polite society immediately and many of these others not?
Just authorized another $800 mil to them. No wonder we can’t afford anything here.
To be fair, Ukraine is taking the punches, the rest of Western Europe would be getting from Putin. And you're getting big bang for your bucks compared to say all the billions and trillions spent in Iraq and Afghanistan.


This made me chuckle, after VDL's grandstanding speech on Ukraine belongs to the EU:


As if Mark Rutte and the provincial council chambers in The Hague have any authority to black ball Ukraine and go against what ever is decided by the technocrats in Brussels. They'll do exactly as they're instructed by diktat or law.
 
Last edited:

BC944FB7-5DFC-4674-94C2-619284DDCFDC.webp
0C0626A2-F397-48A3-B83E-F9A3D859BD8D.webp


It’s hard to overestimate the embarrassment of a ship bristling with missile defence systems getting destroyed by two locally made anti-ship missiles. Then add that it is a flag ship and also the famous go fuck yourself ship.
 
Chechen forces have allegedly executed an American volunteer fighting with the Ukrainian Army defending Mariupol after taking him prisoner following the recent surrenders.

23BF1C89-D9C3-46F6-8EF5-DC0AB6F7EF93.webp
 

A retaliatory strike on a missile plant seems to indicate the Russians believe the Ukrainians were responsible for the sinking.

That said BBC reports people heard jets flying over Lviv. Russian planes can fly that far west?
 

A retaliatory strike on a missile plant seems to indicate the Russians believe the Ukrainians were responsible for the sinking.

That said BBC reports people heard jets flying over Lviv. Russian planes can fly that far west?
The strategic bombing campaign has commenced...
 

"This week the Biden administration announced it was sending 40,000 artillery rounds and 18 155mm howitzers to Ukraine. But with the Ukrainian military using thousands per day, that 40,000 will only last a little over one week, the official explained."
 
Remaining defenders are in the underground tunnels at the Azovstal plant. It will take some work to dislodge them, but it’s looks like Mariupol has nearly fallen.

F0BBC018-31B9-40CB-AF5B-08FD9F2E0E26.webp
 
Mariia Kravchenko
Mariia Kravchenko
Apr 4


What should Russia do with Ukraine? [Translation of a propaganda article by a Russian publication]​


Disclaimer: What you are about to read is a direct translation of an article written by a russian propagandist. This is what real #Russia wants. Please read and share. This text will soon be translated into other languages so that everyone in the world can read about Russia’s crimes.
The original article in Russian is here. In case of deletion — a link to the web archive.
1*BrPH5CX1rzQ8S_sFvJu7Xg.png

This is the article that was published by the Russian state-owned news agency RIA Novosti (Russian: РИА Новости). This media through the years was one of the main voices of Russian propaganda and fake news.

RIA Novosti is known for its systematic support of the Kremlin, violation of journalistic standards and works according to so-called “temnik” (directives and agendas from the government). The position in this article corresponds to the position of Russia.

This particular article is an indication of the Russian main narrative right now. RIA Novosti is trying to hide Russian crimes and spread cynical lies about the Ukrainian army, but also to provide media support for a full-scale program of destroying independent Ukraine.

How does it work? Russians state the facts about cities that were destroyed and civilians that were tortured and murdered. They are talking about Mariupol (a city as big as Edinburgh, Florence, or Lyon) that was almost wiped out, as well as Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Kharkiv — cities under bombardment. They mention the horrors of Bucha, where hundreds of people were murdered and tortured to death. They are talking about 161 children that died in Ukraine during these 40 days. However, they claim that it was the Ukrainian army that committed all these war crimes.

The author, a Russian political technologist, also has the audacity to talk about the Soviet occupation of Ukraine. He is trying to support Putin’s narrative about Ukraine as an artificial country. Instead, the world should remember that the Soviet Union terrorized Ukraine for almost a century with forced collectivization, Great Purge, Terror-Famine (Holodomor), forced deportation, etc.

In this article, the author is describing ways how Russians want to wipe out Ukraine in the same way the Soviet regime did it.

It’s important to spread this article. The Russian war should be stopped now. It was supposed to be stopped 8 years ago when it only began. 71% of Russians feel proud about this war. 75.5% of Russians approve of the idea of a military invasion of the next country and believe that it should be Poland. According to respondents, this is a logical continuation of the so-called “military special operation of the Russian Federation”.

The world should be aware of Russian methods, crimes, and plans. Putin will not stop until he is stopped.

What should Russia do with Ukraine?​


Timofey Sergeytsev
We wrote about the inevitability of Ukraine’s denazification as early as last April. We do not need a Nazi, Banderite Ukraine, the enemy of Russia and a tool of the West used to destroy Russia. Today, the denazification issue has taken a practical turn.
Denazification is necessary when a considerable number of population (very likely most of it) has been subjected to the Nazi regime and engaged into its agenda. That is, when the “good people — bad government” hypothesis does not apply. Recognizing this fact forms the backbone of the denazification policy and all its measures, while the fact itself constitutes its subject.
This is the situation Ukraine has found itself in. The fact that the Ukrainian voter was choosing between the “Poroshenko peace” and the “Zelenskyy peace” must not deceive you: Ukrainians were quite happy with the shortest way to peace via a blitzkrieg, which was strongly alluded to by the last two Ukrainian presidents when they were elected. This was the method used to “pacify” home antifascists in Odesa, Kharkiv, Dnipro[the RU original uses the city’s former name “Dnipropetrovsk”], Mariupol, and other Russian cities — the method of total terror. And ordinary Ukrainians were fine with it. Denazification is a set of actions aimed at the nazified bulk of the population, who technically cannot be directly punished as war criminals.
Those Nazis who took up arms must be destroyed on the battlefield, as many of them as possible. No significant distinction should be made between the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the so-called “nationalist battalions,” as well as the Territorial Defense, who have joined the two other types of military units. They are all equally complicit in the horrendous violence towards civilians, equally complicit in the genocide of the Russian people, and they don’t comply with the laws and customs of war. War criminals and active Nazis must be punished in such a way as to provide an example and a demonstration. A total lustration must be conducted. All organizations involved in Nazi actions must be eliminated and prohibited. However, besides the highest ranks, a significant number of common people are also guilty of being passive Nazis and Nazi accomplices. They supported the Nazi authorities and pandered to them. A just punishment for this part of the population can only be possible through bearing the inevitable hardships of a just war against the Nazi system, waged as carefully and sparingly as possible relates civilians. The further denazification of this bulk of the population will take the form of re-education through ideological repressions (suppression) of Nazi paradigms and a harsh censorship not only in the political sphere but also in the spheres of culture and education. It was through culture and education that the pervasive large-scale Nazification of the population was conducted, ensured by the guarantees of dividends from the Nazi regime victory over Russia, by the Nazi propaganda, internal violence and terror, and the 8-year-long war against the people of Donbas, who have rebelled against the Ukrainian Nazism.
Denazification can only be conducted by the winner, which means (1) their unconditional control over the denazification process and (2) the authority that can ensure such control. For this purpose, a country that is being denazified cannot possess sovereignty. The denazifier state, Russia, cannot take a liberal approach towards denazification. The denazifier ideology cannot be challenged by the guilty party that is being denazified. When Russia admits that Ukraine needs to be denazified, it essentially admits that the Crimea scenario cannot be applied to the whole Ukraine. In all fairness, this scenario was also not possible in the insurgent Donbas in 2014. Only the 8-year-long rebellion against the Nazi violence and terror managed to result in an internal unification and deliberate, explicit, broad-scale refusal of retaining any association with or relation to Ukraine, who has identified itself as a Nazi community.
The period of denazification can take no less than one generation that has to be born, brought upm and mature under the conditions of denazification. The nazification of Ukraine has been going on for more than 30 years — starting from as early as 1989, when Ukrainian nationalism was given legal and legitimate forms of political self-expression and led the movement for “independence”, setting a course for Nazism.
The current nazified Ukraine is characterized by its formlessness and ambivalence, which allow it to disguise Nazism as the aspiration to “independence” and the “European” (Western, pro-American) path of “development” (in reality, to degradation) and claim that “there is no Nazism” in Ukraine, “only few sporadic incidents.” Indeed, there isn’t a main Nazi party, no Führer, no full-fledged racial laws (only a cutdown version in the form of repressions against the Russian language). As a result — no opposition or resistance against the regime.
However, all listed above doesn’t make Ukrainian Nazism a “light version” of the German Nazism of the first half of the 20th century. Quite the opposite: since Ukrainian Nazism is free from such “genre” norms and limitations (which are essentially a product of political technologies), it can spread freely just like a basis for any Nazism — both European and, in its most developed form, the American racism. That’s why there can be no compromise during denazification, as in the case of the “no to NATO, yes to EU” formula. The collective West is in itself the architect, source, and sponsor of Ukrainian Nazism, while the Banderite supporters from Western Ukraine and their “historical memory” is just one of the tools of the nazification of Ukraine. Ukronazism poses a much bigger threat to the world and Russia than the Hitler version of German Nazism.
Apparently, the name “Ukraine” cannot be kept as a title of any fully denazified state entity on the territory liberated from the Nazi regime. The people’s republics, newly created on the territories free from Nazism, must and will develop on the basis of practices of economic self-government and social security, restoration and modernization of systems of essential services for the population.
Their political direction cannot be neutral in practice: the redemption of their guilt before Russia for treating it like an enemy can be manifested only by relying on Russia in the processes of restoration, revival, and development. No “Marshall Plans” can be allowed to happen on these territories. No “neutrality” in the ideological and practical sense that is compatible with denazification can be possible. Individuals and organizations who are to become tools of denazification in the new denazified republics cannot but rely on the direct organizational and force support from Russia.
Denazification will inevitably include de-ukrainization — the rejection of the large-scale artificial inflation of the ethnic component in the self-identification of the population of the historical Malorossiya and Novorossiya territories, which was started by the Soviet authorities. Being a tool of the Communist superpower, this artificial ethnocentrism was not left unclaimed after its fall. It was transferred in its subservient role to a different superpower (the power above states) — the superpower of the West. It needs to be brought back within its natural boundaries and stripped of political functionality.
Unlike, for example, Georgia or the Baltic States, history has proved it impossible for Ukraine to exist as a nation-state, and any attempts to “build” such a nation-state naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construct that has no civilizational substance of its own, a subordinate element of an extraneous and alien civilization. Debanderization alone will not be enough for denazification: the Banderite element is only a hand and a screen, a disguise for the European project of the Nazi Ukraine, which is why the denazification of Ukraine means its inevitable de-europeanization.
The Banderite elites must be eliminated; their re-education is impossible. The social “bog,” which has actively and passively supported them through action and inaction, must go through the hardships of war and internalize the lived experience as a historical lesson and the redemption of its guilt. Those who didn’t support the Nazi regime and suffered from it and the war it started in Donbas must be consolidated and organized, must become the backbone of the new authorities, their vertical and horizontal framework. History has shown that the tragedies and dramas of the war time benefit the peoples who were tempted and carried away by their role as the enemy of Russia.
Denazification as a goal of the special military operation within the limits of the operation itself means a military victory over the Kyiv regime, the liberation of the territories from the armed supporters of nazification, the elimination of hard-line Nazis, the imprisonment of war criminals, and the creating of systemic conditions for further denazification in peacetime.
The latter, in its turn, must begin with the establishment of local governments, militia, and defense institutions, cleansed of Nazi elements, the launching on their basis of constituent processes to create a new republican statehood, the integration of this statehood into the close cooperation with the Russian agency on Ukraine denazification (newly established or reorganized on the basis of, for example, Rossotrudnichestvo), the adoption of the republican regulatory framework (legislation) on denazification under Russian control, the definition of boundaries and frameworks for the direct application of Russian law and Russian jurisdiction in the liberated territory in regard to denazification, the establishment of a tribunal for crimes against humanity in the former Ukraine. In this regard, Russia should act as the guardian of the Nuremberg Trials.
All of the above means that in order to achieve the denazification goals, the support of the population is necessary, as well as its transition to the Russian side after its liberation from the terror, violence, and ideological pressure of the Kyiv regime, and after their withdrawal from informational isolation. Of course, it will take some time for people to recover from the shock of military hostilities, to be convinced of Russia’s long-term intentions, meaning “they will not be abandoned.” It’s impossible to foresee exactly in which territories such a mass of the population will constitute a critically needed majority. The “Catholic province” (Western Ukraine, made up of five oblasts) is unlikely to become part of the pro-Russian territories. The exclusion line, however, will be found experimentally. Behind the line, a forcibly neutral and demilitarized Ukraine will remain, with the formally banned Nazism and hostile to Russia. This is where the haters of Russia will go. The threat of an immediate continuation of the military operation in case of non-compliance with the listed requirements must become a guarantee of the preservation of this obsolete Ukraine in a neutral state. Perhaps this will require a permanent Russian military presence on its territory. From the exclusion line to the Russian border, there will be a territory of potential integration into the Russian civilization, which is inherently anti-fascist.
The operation to denazify Ukraine, which began with a military phase, will follow the same logic of stages in peacetime as during the military operation. At each stage, it will be necessary to achieve irreversible changes, which will become the results of the corresponding stage. In this case, the necessary initial steps of denazification can be defined as follows:
— The elimination of armed Nazi formations (which means any armed formations of Ukraine, including the Armed Forces of Ukraine), as well as the military, informational, and educational infrastructure that ensures their activity;
— The establishment of people’s self-government institutions and militia (defense and law enforcement) of the liberated territories to protect the population from the terror of underground Nazi groups;
— The installation of the Russian information space;
— The seizure of educational materials and the prohibition of educational programs at all levels that contain Nazi ideological guidelines;
— Mass investigations aimed to establish personal responsibility for war crimes, crimes against humanity, the spread of Nazi ideology, and support for the Nazi regime;
— Lustration, making the names of accomplices of the Nazi regime public, involving them in forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities (from among those who have not become subject to the death penalty or imprisonment);
— The adoption at the local level, under the supervision of Russia, of primary normative acts of denazification “from below,” a ban on all types and forms of the revival of Nazi ideology;
— The establishment of memorials, commemorative signs, monuments to the victims of Ukrainian Nazism, perpetuating the memory of the heroes of the struggle against it;
— The inclusion of a set of anti-fascist and denazification norms in the constitutions of the new people’s republics;
— The establishment of permanent denazification institutions for a period of 25 years.
Russia will have no allies in the denazification of Ukraine. Because this is a purely Russian business. And also because it is not just the Bandera version of Nazi Ukraine that will be eradicated. The process will also, and above all, affect Western totalitarianism, the imposed programs of civilizational degradation and disintegration, the mechanisms of subjugation under the superpower of the West and the United States.
In order to put the Ukraine denazification plan into practice, Russia itself will have to finally part with pro-European and pro-Western illusions, acknowledge itself as the last authority in protecting and preserving those values of historical Europe (the Old World) that deserve to preserve and that the West ultimately abandoned, losing the fight for itself. This struggle continued throughout the 20th century and found its expression in the world war and the Russian revolution, which were inextricably linked with each other.
Russia did everything possible to save the West in the 20th century. It implemented the main Western project that constituted an alternative to capitalism, which defeated the nation-states — the Socialist red project. It crushed German Nazism, a monstrous offspring of the crisis of Western civilization. The last act of Russian altruism was its outstretched hand of friendship, for which it received a monstrous blow in the 1990s.
Everything that Russia has done for the West, it has done at its own expense, by making the greatest sacrifices. The West ultimately rejected all these sacrifices, devalued Russia’s contribution to resolving the Western crisis, and decided to take revenge on Russia for the help that it had selflessly provided. From now on, Russia will follow its own way, not worrying about the fate of the West, relying on another part of its heritage — the leadership in the global process of decolonization.
As part of this process, Russia has a high potential for partnerships and alliances with countries that the West has oppressed for centuries and which are not going to put on its yoke again. Without Russian sacrifice and struggle, these countries would not have been liberated. The denazification of Ukraine is at the same time its decolonization, which the population of Ukraine will have to understand as it begins to free itself from the intoxication, temptation, and dependence of the so-called European choice.
* An extremist organization banned in Russia.
Translation: A team of Ukrainian volunteers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://medium.com/
https://medium.com/

https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/me/notifications&source=--------------------------notifications_sidenav-----------
https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/me/lists&source=--------------------------lists_sidenav-----------
https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/me/lists&source=--------------------------lists_sidenav-----------
https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/me/stories/drafts&source=--------------------------stories_sidenav-----------
https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/me/stories/drafts&source=--------------------------stories_sidenav-----------




https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https://medium.com/new-story&source=--------------------------new_post_sidenav-----------






Mariia Kravchenko
Mariia Kravchenko
Apr 4
·
12 min read
·







What should Russia do with Ukraine? [Translation of a propaganda article by a Russian publication]​



1*BrPH5CX1rzQ8S_sFvJu7Xg.png

This is the article that was published by the Russian state-owned news agency RIA Novosti (Russian: РИА Новости). This media through the years was one of the main voices of Russian propaganda and fake news.

RIA Novosti is known for its systematic support of the Kremlin, violation of journalistic standards and works according to so-called “temnik” (directives and agendas from the government). The position in this article corresponds to the position of Russia.

This particular article is an indication of the Russian main narrative right now. RIA Novosti is trying to hide Russian crimes and spread cynical lies about the Ukrainian army, but also to provide media support for a full-scale program of destroying independent Ukraine.

How does it work? Russians state the facts about cities that were destroyed and civilians that were tortured and murdered. They are talking about Mariupol (a city as big as Edinburgh, Florence, or Lyon) that was almost wiped out, as well as Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Kharkiv — cities under bombardment. They mention the horrors of Bucha, where hundreds of people were murdered and tortured to death. They are talking about 161 children that died in Ukraine during these 40 days. However, they claim that it was the Ukrainian army that committed all these war crimes.

The author, a Russian political technologist, also has the audacity to talk about the Soviet occupation of Ukraine. He is trying to support Putin’s narrative about Ukraine as an artificial country. Instead, the world should remember that the Soviet Union terrorized Ukraine for almost a century with forced collectivization, Great Purge, Terror-Famine (Holodomor), forced deportation, etc.

In this article, the author is describing ways how Russians want to wipe out Ukraine in the same way the Soviet regime did it.

It’s important to spread this article. The Russian war should be stopped now. It was supposed to be stopped 8 years ago when it only began. 71% of Russians feel proud about this war. 75.5% of Russians approve of the idea of a military invasion of the next country and believe that it should be Poland. According to respondents, this is a logical continuation of the so-called “military special operation of the Russian Federation”.

The world should be aware of Russian methods, crimes, and plans. Putin will not stop until he is stopped.

What should Russia do with Ukraine?​


Timofey Sergeytsev
We wrote about the inevitability of Ukraine’s denazification as early as last April. We do not need a Nazi, Banderite Ukraine, the enemy of Russia and a tool of the West used to destroy Russia. Today, the denazification issue has taken a practical turn.
Denazification is necessary when a considerable number of population (very likely most of it) has been subjected to the Nazi regime and engaged into its agenda. That is, when the “good people — bad government” hypothesis does not apply. Recognizing this fact forms the backbone of the denazification policy and all its measures, while the fact itself constitutes its subject.
This is the situation Ukraine has found itself in. The fact that the Ukrainian voter was choosing between the “Poroshenko peace” and the “Zelenskyy peace” must not deceive you: Ukrainians were quite happy with the shortest way to peace via a blitzkrieg, which was strongly alluded to by the last two Ukrainian presidents when they were elected. This was the method used to “pacify” home antifascists in Odesa, Kharkiv, Dnipro[the RU original uses the city’s former name “Dnipropetrovsk”], Mariupol, and other Russian cities — the method of total terror. And ordinary Ukrainians were fine with it. Denazification is a set of actions aimed at the nazified bulk of the population, who technically cannot be directly punished as war criminals.
Those Nazis who took up arms must be destroyed on the battlefield, as many of them as possible. No significant distinction should be made between the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the so-called “nationalist battalions,” as well as the Territorial Defense, who have joined the two other types of military units. They are all equally complicit in the horrendous violence towards civilians, equally complicit in the genocide of the Russian people, and they don’t comply with the laws and customs of war. War criminals and active Nazis must be punished in such a way as to provide an example and a demonstration. A total lustration must be conducted. All organizations involved in Nazi actions must be eliminated and prohibited. However, besides the highest ranks, a significant number of common people are also guilty of being passive Nazis and Nazi accomplices. They supported the Nazi authorities and pandered to them. A just punishment for this part of the population can only be possible through bearing the inevitable hardships of a just war against the Nazi system, waged as carefully and sparingly as possible relates civilians. The further denazification of this bulk of the population will take the form of re-education through ideological repressions (suppression) of Nazi paradigms and a harsh censorship not only in the political sphere but also in the spheres of culture and education. It was through culture and education that the pervasive large-scale Nazification of the population was conducted, ensured by the guarantees of dividends from the Nazi regime victory over Russia, by the Nazi propaganda, internal violence and terror, and the 8-year-long war against the people of Donbas, who have rebelled against the Ukrainian Nazism.
Denazification can only be conducted by the winner, which means (1) their unconditional control over the denazification process and (2) the authority that can ensure such control. For this purpose, a country that is being denazified cannot possess sovereignty. The denazifier state, Russia, cannot take a liberal approach towards denazification. The denazifier ideology cannot be challenged by the guilty party that is being denazified. When Russia admits that Ukraine needs to be denazified, it essentially admits that the Crimea scenario cannot be applied to the whole Ukraine. In all fairness, this scenario was also not possible in the insurgent Donbas in 2014. Only the 8-year-long rebellion against the Nazi violence and terror managed to result in an internal unification and deliberate, explicit, broad-scale refusal of retaining any association with or relation to Ukraine, who has identified itself as a Nazi community.
The period of denazification can take no less than one generation that has to be born, brought upm and mature under the conditions of denazification. The nazification of Ukraine has been going on for more than 30 years — starting from as early as 1989, when Ukrainian nationalism was given legal and legitimate forms of political self-expression and led the movement for “independence”, setting a course for Nazism.
The current nazified Ukraine is characterized by its formlessness and ambivalence, which allow it to disguise Nazism as the aspiration to “independence” and the “European” (Western, pro-American) path of “development” (in reality, to degradation) and claim that “there is no Nazism” in Ukraine, “only few sporadic incidents.” Indeed, there isn’t a main Nazi party, no Führer, no full-fledged racial laws (only a cutdown version in the form of repressions against the Russian language). As a result — no opposition or resistance against the regime.
However, all listed above doesn’t make Ukrainian Nazism a “light version” of the German Nazism of the first half of the 20th century. Quite the opposite: since Ukrainian Nazism is free from such “genre” norms and limitations (which are essentially a product of political technologies), it can spread freely just like a basis for any Nazism — both European and, in its most developed form, the American racism. That’s why there can be no compromise during denazification, as in the case of the “no to NATO, yes to EU” formula. The collective West is in itself the architect, source, and sponsor of Ukrainian Nazism, while the Banderite supporters from Western Ukraine and their “historical memory” is just one of the tools of the nazification of Ukraine. Ukronazism poses a much bigger threat to the world and Russia than the Hitler version of German Nazism.
Apparently, the name “Ukraine” cannot be kept as a title of any fully denazified state entity on the territory liberated from the Nazi regime. The people’s republics, newly created on the territories free from Nazism, must and will develop on the basis of practices of economic self-government and social security, restoration and modernization of systems of essential services for the population.
Their political direction cannot be neutral in practice: the redemption of their guilt before Russia for treating it like an enemy can be manifested only by relying on Russia in the processes of restoration, revival, and development. No “Marshall Plans” can be allowed to happen on these territories. No “neutrality” in the ideological and practical sense that is compatible with denazification can be possible. Individuals and organizations who are to become tools of denazification in the new denazified republics cannot but rely on the direct organizational and force support from Russia.
Denazification will inevitably include de-ukrainization — the rejection of the large-scale artificial inflation of the ethnic component in the self-identification of the population of the historical Malorossiya and Novorossiya territories, which was started by the Soviet authorities. Being a tool of the Communist superpower, this artificial ethnocentrism was not left unclaimed after its fall. It was transferred in its subservient role to a different superpower (the power above states) — the superpower of the West. It needs to be brought back within its natural boundaries and stripped of political functionality.
Unlike, for example, Georgia or the Baltic States, history has proved it impossible for Ukraine to exist as a nation-state, and any attempts to “build” such a nation-state naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construct that has no civilizational substance of its own, a subordinate element of an extraneous and alien civilization. Debanderization alone will not be enough for denazification: the Banderite element is only a hand and a screen, a disguise for the European project of the Nazi Ukraine, which is why the denazification of Ukraine means its inevitable de-europeanization.
The Banderite elites must be eliminated; their re-education is impossible. The social “bog,” which has actively and passively supported them through action and inaction, must go through the hardships of war and internalize the lived experience as a historical lesson and the redemption of its guilt. Those who didn’t support the Nazi regime and suffered from it and the war it started in Donbas must be consolidated and organized, must become the backbone of the new authorities, their vertical and horizontal framework. History has shown that the tragedies and dramas of the war time benefit the peoples who were tempted and carried away by their role as the enemy of Russia.
Denazification as a goal of the special military operation within the limits of the operation itself means a military victory over the Kyiv regime, the liberation of the territories from the armed supporters of nazification, the elimination of hard-line Nazis, the imprisonment of war criminals, and the creating of systemic conditions for further denazification in peacetime.
The latter, in its turn, must begin with the establishment of local governments, militia, and defense institutions, cleansed of Nazi elements, the launching on their basis of constituent processes to create a new republican statehood, the integration of this statehood into the close cooperation with the Russian agency on Ukraine denazification (newly established or reorganized on the basis of, for example, Rossotrudnichestvo), the adoption of the republican regulatory framework (legislation) on denazification under Russian control, the definition of boundaries and frameworks for the direct application of Russian law and Russian jurisdiction in the liberated territory in regard to denazification, the establishment of a tribunal for crimes against humanity in the former Ukraine. In this regard, Russia should act as the guardian of the Nuremberg Trials.
All of the above means that in order to achieve the denazification goals, the support of the population is necessary, as well as its transition to the Russian side after its liberation from the terror, violence, and ideological pressure of the Kyiv regime, and after their withdrawal from informational isolation. Of course, it will take some time for people to recover from the shock of military hostilities, to be convinced of Russia’s long-term intentions, meaning “they will not be abandoned.” It’s impossible to foresee exactly in which territories such a mass of the population will constitute a critically needed majority. The “Catholic province” (Western Ukraine, made up of five oblasts) is unlikely to become part of the pro-Russian territories. The exclusion line, however, will be found experimentally. Behind the line, a forcibly neutral and demilitarized Ukraine will remain, with the formally banned Nazism and hostile to Russia. This is where the haters of Russia will go. The threat of an immediate continuation of the military operation in case of non-compliance with the listed requirements must become a guarantee of the preservation of this obsolete Ukraine in a neutral state. Perhaps this will require a permanent Russian military presence on its territory. From the exclusion line to the Russian border, there will be a territory of potential integration into the Russian civilization, which is inherently anti-fascist.
The operation to denazify Ukraine, which began with a military phase, will follow the same logic of stages in peacetime as during the military operation. At each stage, it will be necessary to achieve irreversible changes, which will become the results of the corresponding stage. In this case, the necessary initial steps of denazification can be defined as follows:
— The elimination of armed Nazi formations (which means any armed formations of Ukraine, including the Armed Forces of Ukraine), as well as the military, informational, and educational infrastructure that ensures their activity;
— The establishment of people’s self-government institutions and militia (defense and law enforcement) of the liberated territories to protect the population from the terror of underground Nazi groups;
— The installation of the Russian information space;
— The seizure of educational materials and the prohibition of educational programs at all levels that contain Nazi ideological guidelines;
— Mass investigations aimed to establish personal responsibility for war crimes, crimes against humanity, the spread of Nazi ideology, and support for the Nazi regime;
— Lustration, making the names of accomplices of the Nazi regime public, involving them in forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities (from among those who have not become subject to the death penalty or imprisonment);
— The adoption at the local level, under the supervision of Russia, of primary normative acts of denazification “from below,” a ban on all types and forms of the revival of Nazi ideology;
— The establishment of memorials, commemorative signs, monuments to the victims of Ukrainian Nazism, perpetuating the memory of the heroes of the struggle against it;
— The inclusion of a set of anti-fascist and denazification norms in the constitutions of the new people’s republics;
— The establishment of permanent denazification institutions for a period of 25 years.
Russia will have no allies in the denazification of Ukraine. Because this is a purely Russian business. And also because it is not just the Bandera version of Nazi Ukraine that will be eradicated. The process will also, and above all, affect Western totalitarianism, the imposed programs of civilizational degradation and disintegration, the mechanisms of subjugation under the superpower of the West and the United States.
In order to put the Ukraine denazification plan into practice, Russia itself will have to finally part with pro-European and pro-Western illusions, acknowledge itself as the last authority in protecting and preserving those values of historical Europe (the Old World) that deserve to preserve and that the West ultimately abandoned, losing the fight for itself. This struggle continued throughout the 20th century and found its expression in the world war and the Russian revolution, which were inextricably linked with each other.
Russia did everything possible to save the West in the 20th century. It implemented the main Western project that constituted an alternative to capitalism, which defeated the nation-states — the Socialist red project. It crushed German Nazism, a monstrous offspring of the crisis of Western civilization. The last act of Russian altruism was its outstretched hand of friendship, for which it received a monstrous blow in the 1990s.
Everything that Russia has done for the West, it has done at its own expense, by making the greatest sacrifices. The West ultimately rejected all these sacrifices, devalued Russia’s contribution to resolving the Western crisis, and decided to take revenge on Russia for the help that it had selflessly provided. From now on, Russia will follow its own way, not worrying about the fate of the West, relying on another part of its heritage — the leadership in the global process of decolonization.
As part of this process, Russia has a high potential for partnerships and alliances with countries that the West has oppressed for centuries and which are not going to put on its yoke again. Without Russian sacrifice and struggle, these countries would not have been liberated. The denazification of Ukraine is at the same time its decolonization, which the population of Ukraine will have to understand as it begins to free itself from the intoxication, temptation, and dependence of the so-called European choice.
* An extremist organization banned in Russia.
Translation: A team of Ukrainian volunteers














More from Mariia Kravchenko



Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.
Try Knowable

Recommended from Medium​

OTT
OTT
in
OTT Conference 2021

Think tanks and democratic transitions​

1*ZJKg1s3-msKvAw8OXrwXzg.jpeg

OTT
OTT
in
OTT Conference 2021

Tensions and understandings between civil society and the government​

1*nWd8KJXZtyIs0RyglNMhKw.jpeg

Austin Kocher, PhD
Austin Kocher, PhD

500,000 Ukrainian Refugees Flee the Country but Little-Known Law May Exempt Them From the Asylum…​

1*SBf1G3nXITtDOvO2AmoYfw.png

Ashish Shukla
Ashish Shukla

New US farce in Ankara today is the latest from the West​

1*-733w74D-2InZYPnEcErhQ.jpeg

Rajeevchandra In
Rajeevchandra In

Serving for kerala rajeevchandrasekhar​


kumari minal
kumari minal

Ethiopian Airlines Crash : The causes and consequences​


Harriot Heyward
Harriot Heyward

Jeremy Corbyn calls for ISIS bride Shamima Begum's 'return to Britain'​


SVX
SVX

Five key impact headlines in the 2021 Canadian federal budget​

1*1wcqM0WPd8tCJlBkcSJKSw.jpeg

Sign In



Mariia Kravchenko


Mariia Kravchenko








More from Medium​

Y. Kerry Sara
Y. Kerry Sara

TUCKER, TULSI, and the “Prestigious Preppies for Putin”​

0*oWIPzm-mWMv9rHqb

Miguel Santos
Miguel Santos

a naive take on the war in ukraine​


Octavio Z. Sánchez
Octavio Z. Sánchez

On the Russian invasion of Ukraine​

1*BOu86TEDnbJJ16f48rCP9Q.jpeg

Robert A. Levine
Robert A. Levine

Putin, Russia and War​

And that tragically, is typical of Russian MSM now. They have very sinister plans for the Ukrainian people, it's lands and the rest of Europe. We should act accordingly, and get off Putin's gas as soon as possible - like now - and ensure he's faced down ruthlessly, through sanctions and our ability to strike back immediately for any invasions elsewhere.

The Russians are already behind the Iron Curtain and their lights are out. It's too late now for appeasement and negotiations with a serial liar.
 
We should act accordingly, and get off Putin's gas as soon as possible - like now - and ensure he's faced down ruthlessly, through sanctions and our ability to strike back immediately for any invasions elsewhere.

Or keep financing them so they can build infrastructure to pivot over to sell to eager Chinese and Indians.
 
Or keep financing them so they can build infrastructure to pivot over to sell to eager Chinese and Indians.
They can sell to anyone degenerate enough considering secondary sanctions, but we shouldn't be sponsoring Putin's Russian Imperial fantasies.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom