formby002
Identifies as a Barn Owl
- Messages
- 2,432
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prince Charles and William had a meeting with Harry and The Daily Mail said they met him together out of ''fear''. Doubt that very much, I think it was more of a case of ensuring witnesses.Princes William And Harry Will Not Walk Side by Side at Prince Philip's Funeral
Further details of Prince Philip's funeral plans have been confirmed, including the fact that the Queen will be wearing a mask throughout and sitting alone, in line with current COVID-19 restrictions.www.townandcountrymag.com
More drama.
Prince Charles and William had a meeting with Harry and The Daily Mail said they met him together out of ''fear''. Doubt that very much, I think it was more of a case of ensuring witnesses.
Looking good here in Wales yesterday, but I do hope he decides to rescind his ascent to the throne and passes it on straight to Prince William:
Other than the initial deception to get the interview, did he not just get her to speak the truth?Time to dismantle the BBC, blood on their hands:
ANDREW NEIL gives his devastating verdict over BBC interview
ANDREW NEIL: Charles Spencer drew a straight line between the lies and deception Martin Bashir told Princess Diana to inveigle his way into an interview with her and her tragic death.www.dailymail.co.uk
The point is the interview was arrived at through deceptive means and Princess Diana was manipulated and had her fears and paranoia confirmed which was part of the chain of events that led to her untimely death. Whilst the interview did deliver some information in the public interest and truth there in, I'm afraid the background of the interview is too toxic now. She was framed by the BBC, hook line and sinker.Other than the initial deception to get the interview, did he not just get her to speak the truth?
Yes. Her acceptance involved deception. But that deception allowed the true story to emerge. It produced news, which is what news providers are tasked wiith delivering.The point is the interview was arrived at through deceptive means and Princess Diana was manipulated and had her fears and paranoia confirmed which was part of the chain of events that led to her untimely death. Whilst the interview did deliver some information in the public interest and truth there in, I'm afraid the background of the interview is too toxic now. She was framed by the BBC, hook line and sinker.
What eventually happened was sad, but what do you expect when the wife of the next-in-line to the throne, who sees himself as a thinker, couldn't even get 'O' levels despite an elite private education?
He didn't apply himself did he? Either that, or they'd had already depleted the gene pool by that stage. Certainly Harry may have been an example of that, unless Major Hewitt was his dad.What eventually happened was sad, but what do you expect when the wife of the next-in-line to the throne, who sees himself as a thinker, couldn't even get 'O' levels despite an elite private education?
Real weakling. Just re-reading Alan Sillitoe's Saturday Night, Sunday Morning, back then the average working class Englishman would do double that on a Saturday night with added gins on top.Whatever happened it drove poor Harry to drink one week's worth of alcohol every day. Although if he is going by standard NHS recommended alcohol intake that means he's almost teetotal compared to your typical Englishman.
It 's Diana who failed the O Levels, not Charlie.He didn't apply himself did he? Either that, or they'd had already depleted the gene pool by that stage. Certainly Harry may have been an example of that, unless Major Hewitt was his dad.
Real weakling. Just re-reading Alan Sillitoe's Saturday Night, Sunday Morning, back then the average working class Englishman would do double that on a Saturday night with added gins on top.
He's even weaker than I imagined!It 's Diana who failed the O Levels, not Charlie.
Regarding Harry's drinking, he boasts that he had a week's worth on one of tbe weekend days. He's not saying he drank that every day. In other words, he hardly drank at all.
Regarding Harry's drinking, he boasts that he had a week's worth on one of tbe weekend days. He's not saying he drank that every day. In other words, he hardly drank at all.
He's even weaker than I imagined!
The Brit journalist, Julie Burchill, commented on that very principle and was then cancelled and sacked from her gig at The Telegraph:I was thinking she would have some name that reflected the black heritage in some manner of authenticity.
Are you supposed to be looking as if you’re enjoying yourself?
He has to have his day in court, or otherwise he comes across as someone with something to hide.what are the odds this piece of shit will see even the slightest of consequences?
Yes god forbid we refer to the pedophile continually dodging authorities as a criminal before some British court laughably tosses the whole case out on the doctrine of “well the queen said so”He has to have his day in court, or otherwise he comes across as someone with something to hide.
Innocent until proven guilty though.
We shouldn't be commenting too much, less we prejudice the case.
It's a better system than guilty until proven innocent is it not?Yes god forbid we refer to the pedophile continually dodging authorities as a criminal before some British court laughably tosses the whole case out on the doctrine of “well the queen said so”
It's a better system than guilty until proven innocent is it not?
At this stage, he is innocent, but with a large and dark cloud looming over him.