sirloin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,142
Do remember that one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a 21 GYW shoe rotation. I am not sure mine are that pristine.
Well, if you wear a pair twice a week for 6 months, you’ll have around 50 wears in them. If you wear shoes twice a month, you’re at about 250 wears at ten years of age. I don’t own shoos which don’t show 250 wears and more when thus worn.
Do remember that one.
Also visible in the video, this spectacular pair of spectators (co-respondents):Absolutely amazing! He has a shoe museum.
almostvintagestyle.com
Most people couldn't be bothered and who can blame them?Word for the day: rotation
Yes, some pairs are unwatchable (some from Dolce&Gabbana, Gaulthier, Paul Smith), just collected for its sake, not for wearing.Some of the shoes were horrible, but I consider him more a collector that anything else.
Loake Errington, chukka. Claridge last. Made in India.
Bad creasing from day one. If a shoe doesn't fit....
That's right, but he has very few of those disgraces and a myriad of great pieces instead.I watched that video.
I couldn't have these in my house. And with a collection that big, they're taking up space that could be occupied by something nice.
View attachment 37743View attachment 37744
I think you are probably right.A lot of it comes down to leather quality, too.
So yes, although fit can influence creasing, those really large, coarse creases are because of the thicker and lower-quality leather used in the Loakes.
Even longer with me, I got rid of some lesser pairs from the late 1990s and early 2000s a few years back.I've actually had shoes myself for four or five years and not worn them - always waiting for the 'right occasion' to mark the sole. I would sometimes get them out and admire them before selling them when I needed the money. Sad.
I also have two pairs of John Lobb waiting for the "right" occasion.Even longer with me, I got rid of some lesser pairs from the late 1990s and early 2000s a few years back.
This winter I had my two C&J's Coniston's downstairs in the hallway cupboard lined up on the shoe rotation and I never worn them once. Either pair. Just wasn't in the mood for them. Probably because I'm not commuting on public transport or going out on a wintry evening into The Hague.
i find these oddly attractive in the most disgusting way possible.Some people have a lot of (bad) fantasy: this customer wanted to have the reproduction of the Melencolia, engraving by Albrecht Duerer, on his footwear and Altan Bottier was glad to please.
View attachment 37768
Is this not akin to tattooing?i find these oddly attractive in the most disgusting way possible.
I have never laced like this, but I can recall the fashion starting. Is it functional?The lacing is really unpleasant to the eye.
I have no idea nor will I ever find out as this meant I‘d have to put on Corghey shoo atrocities or similar.I have never laced like this, but I can recall the fashion starting. Is it functional?
Corthay ultraghey shoes:I have no idea nor will I ever find out as this meant I‘d have to put on Corghey shoo atrocities or similar.
vass-shoes.com
It looks a good looking well-fitting comfortable shoe that will not be bothered by gravel and the odd branch.Casually dressed today. Off to the farm on a lazy Sunday.
Santoni norvegese shoos
View attachment 37797View attachment 37798
It looks a good looking well-fitting comfortable shoe that will not be bothered by gravel and the odd branch.
I have a pal with a bit of a farm. I isually wear Dainite for visits, but next time I'll give a double-soled leather brogue a whirl.
Talking about shoe collections, who remembers The Hand made Burmese Teak shoe cabinet and the big daddy Lobbs and Greens?https://www.styleforum.net/threads/...espoke-burmese-teak-wood-shoe-cabinet.121126/ The history has a second half and is that the guy offloaded majority of the shoes later on ebay/ B&S on SF
![]()
The cabinet itself is not my taste, but, as I find, it's a good way to store one's footwear: you can see at once all your shoes and pick the choice of the day.Talking about shoe collections, who remembers The Hand made Burmese Teak shoe cabinet and the big daddy Lobbs and Greens?https://www.styleforum.net/threads/...espoke-burmese-teak-wood-shoe-cabinet.121126/ The history has a second half and is that the guy offloaded majority of the shoes later on ebay/ B&S on SF
![]()
Americans do the crossover lacing thing. Most Brits use the straight laced shoe shop style. Ian’s shoe lace site is interesting for options - particularly for boots. I do now use crossover for heavy brogue derbies. Army lacing is good for nine hole boots.I have never laced like this, but I can recall the fashion starting. Is it functional?
Yes, the crossover lacing is totally unsuitable for oxfords and even sleek, elegant derbys, only acceptable on heavy, rustic, military styles, especially boots.Americans do the crossover lacing thing. Most Brits use the straight laced shoe shop style. Ian’s shoe lace site is interesting for options - particularly for boots. I do now use crossover for heavy brogue derbies. Army lacing is good for nine hole boots.


www.skoaktiebolaget.com
| Prestige Oxfords | Last |
| Becketts | 8000 |
| Cavendish | 7000 |
| Garnier II | 7000 |
| Lazenby | 7000 |
| Marldon | 7000 |
| Philip II | 7000 |
| Rothley | 7000 |
| Seaton | 7000 |
| Stafford | 7000 |
| Vienna II | 7000 |
| Warwick | 7000 |
| Woodcote | 8000 |
| Classic Oxfords | Last |
| Ash | 0215 |
| City | 8695 |
| City II | 7000 |
| City III | 7000 |
| Fore | 8695 |
| Heath | 7000 |
| Klein | 8695 |
| Saunton | 7000 |
| Staveley | 8000 |
| Stowey | 8695 |
| Towcester | 7000 |
| Weir | 8695 |
| Winchester | 7000 |
| Prestige Derbys | Last |
| Archer | 8000 |
| Elswick | 7000 |
| Grafton | 8000 |
| Hastings | 1105 |
| Marston | 7000 |
| Philip II Derby | 7000 |
| Portman | 7000 |
| Warwick Derby | 7000 |
| Welham | 8000 |
| York | 7000 |
| Classic Derbys | Last |
| Aire | 8695 |
| Ashton | 7000 |
| Bay | 8695 |
| Brackley | 7000 |
| Cliffe | 8695 |
| Croft | 8695 |
| Darby II | 8695 |
| Darby III | 7000 |
| Drift | 8695 |
| Elson | 8695 |
| Harbour | 8695 |
| Harlyn | 8695 |
| Hayle | 8695 |
| Hollow | 0015 |
| Isle | 2099 |
| Milan | 8695 |
| Penzance | 1105 |
| Perrier | 8896 |
| Pierson | 8695 |
| Tamar | 8000 |
| Tiverton | 8000 |
| Weldon | 8695 |
| Prestige Boots | Last |
| Canonbury | 7000 |
| Oake | 7000 |
| Classic Boots | Last |
| Abbot | 8695B |
| Alder | 8695B |
| Combe | 0015B |
| Elmer | 8695 |
| Endel | 8695B |
| Fern | 7000B |
| Ferris | 8695B |
| Forge | 0015 |
| Grove | 0015 |
| Helland | 8695B |
| Hinton | 8695B |
| Lawry | 8695B |
| Quay | 7000B |
| Romsey | 8000 |
| Scott | 8695 |
| Talland | 8695B |
| Wareham | 8695B |
| William II Boot | 9795 |
| Prestige Buckles | Last |
| Chapel | 8000 |
| Coast | 7000 |
| Easton | 7000 |
| Jermyn II | 7000 |
| John Lobb 2010 | 7000 |
| Naseby | 7000 |
| Philip II Double Buckle | 7000 |
| Redmire | 7000 |
| Swyre | 7000 |
| Classic Buckles | Last |
| Ashill | 7000 |
| Camborne | 7000 |
| Derwent | 8000 |
| Fould | 8695 |
| Morval | 0015 |
| Ringmore | 0015 |
| William | 9795 |
| William II | 9795 |
| Prestige Loafers | Last |
| Edward | 7000 |
| Elm | 7000 |
| Foxton | 4596 |
| Keyne | 0215 |
| Philip II Loafer | 7000 |
| Warwick Loafer | 7000 |
| Classic Loafers | Last |
| Aley | 8695L |
| Alton | 4515 |
| Amble | 4098 |
| Arima | 6000 |
| Ashley | 4596 |
| Byrne | 7810 |
| Evesham | 7000 |
| Fencote | 4098 |
| Finedon | 3198 |
| Jihel | 4098 |
| Kipling | 4596 |
| Lopez | 4395 |
| Tore | 4395 |
| Trenton | 7810 |
| Truro | 4098 |
| Wells | 0215 |