On the one hand, it is concerning that a company like Twitter controls access to so much public discourse nowadays.
On the other hand, how is this really very different from the situation prior to just a few years ago, where large companies (hello, News Limited!) owned newspapers, radio stations, television stations and even movie studios? There was no right of access then. Murdoch and his minions decided what news to publish, and who was allowed to provide comments on the news of the day. You could write a letter to the editor, but there was no guarantee at all that your letter would be published.
Back then, the only way to get your voice heard was to print and hand out flyers, or to stand on a box at speaker's corner and shout at passers-by. Nowadays, you can start a blog, make a YouTube channel, join Tik Tok, or get yourself heard in a number of other ways.
Yes, Twitter is influential but I think that people forget just how many different ways that individuals can now make themselves heard, compared to just a few short years ago.
The Big Tech monopolies are moving in for the prize now: to become an immoveable extension of government. If they can erase the President, they can erase you.
I see that you still possess your gift for hyperbole!
Trump literally has the biggest bully pulpit in the world. He has a full-time press secretary and a cadre of communications staff. He has the White House website at his command. If he picks up the phone and calls a TV or radio station, he can be broadcast across any news channel he chooses. If he issues a press release, it will be published on the internet and across newspapers. If he holds a press conference, it will be broadcast across TV and the internet for billions to watch.
And this is the person you say has been erased...