Coronavirus

That's an interesting article.

Can't see it well on the map, but no spikes in Sweden? Other places "that failed to control the spread of Covid" (rolfmao) have no excess mortality at least, according to the article. So maybe also no spikes?

Potential reasons for "everyone being sick more often" given in the article:

1. "Covid lockdowns shifted baseline immunity", "immune debt" - but "experts" say that's not the whole reason and and one particular experts says it's a "really complicated set of things going on"
2. "pandemic's hit to overall vaccine administration" (so also lockdown?)
3. "climate change" (wtf?), "social inequality", "wrung-out health care services"
4. "greater surveillance and testing"
5. "lockdowns kept people alive that would have otherwise died" (so also lockdown?)

Interesting. So what's not a potential reason according to the article:

1. (multiple) Covid infections
2. (multiple) mRNA vaccinations

So while it is great that there is another legacy media article on the damage of lockdowns (another thing that was known all along by anyone not retarded), like many ex-covidiots like to write them now, this is also another great example of nothing having to do with anything.
 
güero said:
That's an interesting article.

Can't see it well on the map, but no spikes in Sweden? Other places "that failed to control the spread of Covid" (rolfmao) have no excess mortality at least, according to the article. So maybe also no spikes?

Potential reasons for "everyone being sick more often" given in the article:

1. "Covid lockdowns shifted baseline immunity", "immune debt" - but "experts" say that's not the whole reason and and one particular experts says it's a "really complicated set of things going on"
2. "pandemic's hit to overall vaccine administration" (so also lockdown?)
3. "climate change" (wtf?), "social inequality", "wrung-out health care services"
4. "greater surveillance and testing"
5. "lockdowns kept people alive that would have otherwise died" (so also lockdown?)

Interesting. So what's not a potential reason according to the article:

1. (multiple) Covid infections
2. (multiple) mRNA vaccinations

So while it is great that there is another legacy media article on the damage of lockdowns (another thing that was known all along by anyone not retarded), like many ex-covidiots like to write them now, this is also another great example of nothing having to do with anything.
Click to expand...
Sometimes I do wonder if you have a learning disability. Then I read your posts and get my answer.
 
güero said:
Kindly do provide a more adequate summary of the article, in order to help with my disability.
Click to expand...
The article is complete bullshit I thought you would have picked that out. It's because of immunity debt, reporting, poverty, missed vaccines. But NOT ONCE does this Bloomberg article mention that thousands of scientists have verified and peer-reviewed the fact that covid harms the immune system. Not once.
 
Grand Potentate said:
The article is complete bullshit I thought you would have picked that out. It's because of immunity debt, reporting, poverty, missed vaccines. But NOT ONCE does this Bloomberg article mention that thousands of scientists have verified and peer-reviewed the fact that covid harms the immune system. Not once.
Click to expand...
Well see I thought I made it quite clear that I think it is useless and I also specifically stated what the article does not mention.
 
That's interesting, not many around anymore. I assume you try the 6ft-distancing, get vaccinated etc as well. How many times do you think you have been infected so far?
 
güero said:
That's interesting, not many around anymore
Click to expand...
Believe me, I am VERY aware. I’m high risk so I need to take care when out. It hasn’t made me too many friends.

güero said:
I assume you try the 6ft-distancing, get vaccinated etc as well.
Click to expand...
Vaccinated, of course. No one distances any longer. I have to tell people to back the fuck up more often than not. Down here they love to crawl up your ass.

güero said:
How many times do you think you have been infected so far?
Click to expand...
One that I know of. Sadly, that was more than enough, as I ended up with some extremely nasty long Covid side effects from it.
 
Grand Potentate said:
One that I know of. Sadly, that was more than enough, as I ended up with some extremely nasty long Covid side effects from it.
Click to expand...
That's pretty good. For me, I'm estimating about infection one each quarter for the past two years or so. Either that, or the vaccine wrecked my immune system so much that I get other respiratory infections more easily.
 
güero said:
That's pretty good. For me, I'm estimating about infection one each quarter for the past two years or so. Either that, or the vaccine wrecked my immune system so much that I get other respiratory infections more easily.
Click to expand...
No that is the cumulative effects of the multiple Covid infections.
 
Grand Potentate said:
No that is the cumulative effects of the multiple Covid infections.
Click to expand...
Not in my case. It got worse way before I even had a chance to get infected (as a generally law-abiding citizen, I had to get tested pretty much everyday. Sometimes even multiple times. So I'm fairly certain I never got infected during the years of the covidiot regime).
 
güero said:
Not in my case. It got worse way before I even had a chance to get infected (as a generally law-abiding citizen, I had to get tested pretty much everyday. Sometimes even multiple times. So I'm fairly certain I never got infected during the years of the covidiot regime).
Click to expand...
Yes in your case. Studies have shown that repeated infections, even of the newer variants, have a cumulative effect and are leading to people being sicker more often. This is now a verifiable scientific fact. It wasn’t the vaccine, it’s the virus.
 
Grand Potentate said:
Yes in your case. Studies have shown that repeated infections, even of the newer variants, have a cumulative effect and are leading to people being sicker more often. This is now a verifiable scientific fact. It wasn’t the vaccine, it’s the virus.
Click to expand...
That's not true, unless you find a study controlling for vaccinated/non-vaccinated. You can possibly say it is the virus, but you certainly can't say it's not the vaccine. That has never been tested.
 
güero said:
That's not true, unless you find a study controlling for vaccinated/non-vaccinated. You can possibly say it is the virus, but you certainly can't say it's not the vaccine. That has never been tested.
Click to expand...
Vaccine status has nothing to do with it. The actual catching of the virus is all that’s necessary for it to have effects on the cells in your body. All the vaccine does is keep you from dying from it.
 
Grand Potentate said:
I am not sure of the various study parameters. Check out the multiple studies.
Click to expand...
Stumbled across this one for you in an article I was reading

www.nature.com

Acute and postacute sequelae associated with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection - Nature Medicine

A new analysis using US Department of Veterans Affairs databases showed that reinfection is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, hospitalization and a wide range of long COVID complications in individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 compared to those with no reinfection.
www.nature.com www.nature.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom